Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding and Overcoming Challenges Faced by Working Mothers: A Theoretical and Empirical Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Perspectives on Work and the Transition to Motherhood

Abstract

Working mothers face different sets of challenges with regards to social identity, stigmatization, and discrimination within each stage of the employment cycle, from differential hiring practices, unequal career advancement opportunities, ineffective retention efforts, and inaccessible work-family supportive policies (Jones et al. in The Psychology for Business Success. Praeger, Westport, CT, 2013). Not only do these inequalities have negative effects on women, but they can also have a detrimental impact on organizations as a whole. In this chapter, we review several theoretical and empirical studies pertaining to the challenges faced by women throughout their work-motherhood transitions. We then offer strategies that organizations, mothers, and allies can use to effectively improve the workplace experiences of pregnant women and mothers. This chapter will specifically contribute to the existing literature by drawing on identity management and ally research from other domains to suggest additional strategies that female targets and supportive coworkers can engage into help remediate these negative workplace outcomes. Finally, we highlight future research directions aimed at testing the effectiveness of these and other remediation strategies, as well as the methodological challenges and solutions to those challenges associated with this important research domain. We call upon researchers to develop more theory-driven, empirically tested intervention strategies that utilize all participants in this fight to end gender inequality in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2003). The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2010). Social psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi:10.1037/h0055756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn-Nardo, L., Morris, K. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2008). The Confronting Prejudiced Responses (CPR) Model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management: Learning and Education, 7, 332–342. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251671

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L. (1993). Breaking the mold: Women, men, and time in the new corporate world. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, H., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M, Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., Crosby, F., & Williams, J. (Eds.) (2004). The maternal wall. Research and policy perspectives on discrimination against mothers [Special Issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. K., & Edwards, K. (2009). Allies in the workplace: Including LGBT in HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 136–149. doi:10.1177/1523422308328500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, D. M., & Plant, E. A. (2011). Interorientation interactions and impressions: Does the timing of disclosure of sexual orientation matter? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Yang, T. S. (2012). How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1–25. doi:10.1037/a0030389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (2008). Advancing women leaders: The connection between women board directors and women corporate officers. New York: Catalyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, A. (2001). The price of motherhood: Why the most important job in the world is still the least valued. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., & Mark, A. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Hebl, M. R. (2005). Discrimination at the level of the individual: Cognitive and affective factors. Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases, 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 1380–1383. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The developmental social psychology of gender, 123–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C., Seron, C., Oglensky, B., & Saute, R. (1999). The part time paradox: Time norms, professional lives, family and gender. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2011). Charge statistics FY 1997 through FY 2010. Retrieved January 30, 2016, from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm.

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147. doi:10.1080/10463280600681248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. (1982). Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women. Sex Roles, 8, 891–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model. Dual-process theories in social psychology, 321–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, J. J., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Sanchez, D. T. (2012). When do we confront? Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 210–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., Ladge, J., & Clair, J. (2009). Negotiating pregnancy at work: public and private conflicts. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2, 42–56. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00027.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1499–1511. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., & Skorinko, J. (2005). Acknowledging one’s physical disability in the interview: Does “when” make a difference? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2477–2492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family–work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 5, 939–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., Scott, R. A., & French, R. S. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. P., Botsford Morgan, W., Walker, S. S., & King, E. B. (2013). Bias in promoting employed mothers. In M. Paludi (Ed.), The Psychology for Business Success. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. P., & King, E. B. (2013). Managing concealable stigmas at work a review and multilevel model. Journal of Management,. doi:10.1177/0149206313515518

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele-Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J., & Bowling, N. A. (2013). A meta-analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1076–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B. (2008). The effect of bias on the advancement of working mothers: Disentangling legitimate concerns from inaccurate stereotypes as predictors of advancement in academe. Human Relations, 61, 1677–1711. doi:10.1177/0018726708098082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., & Botsford, W. E. (2009). Managing pregnancy disclosures: Understanding and overcoming the challenges of expectant motherhood at work. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 314–323. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., George, J. M., & Matusik, S. F. (2010). Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. Journal of Management, 36, 482–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Shapiro, J. R., Hebl, M. R., Singletary, S. L., & Turner, S. (2006). The stigma of obesity in customer service: a mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 579–593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrynowicz, D., & Biernat, M. (1997). Decoding subjective evaluations: How stereotypes provide shifting standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B., & Matthews, R. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 352–369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A., King, E., McCausland, T., Jones, K., & Dunleavy, E. (2013). What we know and don’t: Eradicating employment discrimination 50 years after the Civil Rights Act. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyness, K. S., Thompson, C. A., Francesco, A. M., & Judiesch, M. K. (1999). Work and pregnancy: Individual and organizational factors influencing organizational commitment, timing of maternity leave, and return to work. Sex Roles, 41, 485–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V., Kalleberg, A. L., & Cook, C. R. (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment. Work and Occupations, 20, 368–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, L. (2012). Confronting bias: How targets and allies can address prejudice against gay men in the workplace (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral Thesis, Rice University. http://hdl.handle.net/1911/64667)

  • Morgan, W. B., Walker, S. S, Jones, K. P., & King, E. B. (2011). Reactions to when and how expectant mothers disclose their pregnant status. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W. B., Walker, S. S., Hebl, M. M. R., & King, E. B. (2013). A field experiment: Reducing interpersonal discrimination toward pregnant job applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 799–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlow, L. A. (1995). Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organization Management, 20, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21, 952–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. The Journal of Social Issues, 60, 683–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggs, E. N., Martinez, L. R., & Hebl, M. R. (2011). How individuals and organizations can reduce interpersonal discrimination. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 29–42. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00332.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabat, I. E., Martinez, L. R., & Wessel, J. L. (2013). Neo-Activism: Engaging Allies in Modern Workplace Discrimination Reduction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 480–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., Croft, A., Scarnier, M., Lickel, B., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Implicit and explicit emotional reactions to witnessing prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Vorauer, J. D. (2006). Threatened identities and interethnic interactions. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 321–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singletary, S. L., & Hebl, M. R. (2009). Compensatory strategies for reducing interpersonal discrimination: the effectiveness of acknowledgments, increased positivity, and individuating information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 797–805. doi:10.1037/a0014185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B, Jr. (2011). Self-verification theory. In P. Van Lang, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: a control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6–15. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the ‘family gap’ in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, J., & Evans, N. J. (1991). Becoming an ally. In N. J. Evans & V. A. Wall (Eds.), Beyond tolerance: Gays, lesbians and bisexuals on campus (pp. 195–204). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. E., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Controlling racial prejudice: Social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychological Science, 16, 56–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2001). Unbending gender: Why work and family conflict and what to do about it. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C., Manvell, J., & Bornstein, S. (2006). “Opt Out” or pushed out?: How the press covers work/family conflict. The Center for WorkLife Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C., & Segal, N. (2004). Beyond the maternal wall: Relief for family caregivers who are discriminated against on the job. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 26, 77–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (1998). Sex, schemas, and success: What’s keeping women back? Academe, 84, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitek, E. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2007). The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 867–876. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, George Mason University, MSN 3F5, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030-4444, USA

    Isaac E. Sabat, Alex P. Lindsey, Eden B. King & Kristen P. Jones

Authors
  1. Isaac E. Sabat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex P. Lindsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eden B. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristen P. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Isaac E. Sabat or Eden B. King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

    Christiane Spitzmueller

  2. Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University Department of Psychology, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA

    Russell A. Matthews

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sabat, I.E., Lindsey, A.P., King, E.B., Jones, K.P. (2016). Understanding and Overcoming Challenges Faced by Working Mothers: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. In: Spitzmueller, C., Matthews, R. (eds) Research Perspectives on Work and the Transition to Motherhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41121-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation