Advertisement

Tubal Diseases

  • Stefano GuerrieroEmail author
  • Silvia Ajossa
  • Valentina Corda
  • Maura Perniciano
  • Alba Piras
  • Alessandra Cappai
Chapter

Abstract

Inflammatory process of the pelvis, or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), is a frequent and serious yet treatable disease that can lead to abscess formation or pelvic fluid accumulation. When the abscess or the fluid remains into the tube, the pathology was called hydrosalpinx or pyosalpinx [1]. The condition can affect one or both fallopian tubes.

Keywords

Fallopian Tube Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Dermoid Cyst Adnexal Mass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 3.1

Visualization of incomplete septa (AVI 8905 kb)

Video 3.2

Another case of visualization of incomplete septa (AVI 2188 kb)

Video 3.3

Visualization of “beads-on-a-string” sign, small hyperechoic mural nodules seen on the cross section of the fluid-filled distended structure (AVI 19140 kb)

Video 3.4

Visualization of tubo-ovarian complex (AVI 3567 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS. Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(1):56–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gales W, Wasserheit JN. Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1771–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Expert Committee on Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. Research directions for the 1990s. Sex Trans Dis. 1991;18:46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alcázar JL, Guerriero S, Mínguez JÁ, Ajossa S, Paoletti AM, Ruiz-Zambrana A, Jurado M. Adding cancer antigen 125 screening to gray scale sonography for predicting specific diagnosis of benign adnexal masses in premenopausal women: is it worthwhile? J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(10):1381–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sokalska A, Timmerman D, Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Lissoni AA, Leone FP, Jurkovic D, Valentin L. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(4):462–70. doi: 10.1002/uog.6444.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:861–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strandell A. The influence of hydrosalpinx on IVF and embryo transfer: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(4):387–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strandell A, Lindhard A. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1141–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eytan O, Azem F, Gull I, Wolman I, Elad D, Jaffa AJ. The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(12):2662–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD002125.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sowter MC, Akande VA, Williams JA, Hull MG. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2147–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Voorhis BJ, Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Stovall DW. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:736–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hammadieh N, Coomarasamy A, Ola B, Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Sharif K. Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(5):1113–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den071. Epub 2008 Mar 13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guedes-Martins L, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Barreiro M. Successful pregnancies outcomes with the use of in vitro fertilization after Essure® unilateral hydrosalpinx occlusion. Acta Med Port. 2014;27(3):342–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D'Arpe S, Franceschetti S, Caccetta J, Pietrangeli D, Muzii L, Panici PB. Management of hydrosalpinx before IVF: a literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;24:1–4 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography associated with colour Doppler energy in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(7):1568–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Bar Yam Y, Elgali S, Rottem S. The technique of transvaginal sonography with the use of a 6.5 MHz probe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1019–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Timor-Tritsch IE. Adnexal masses. In: Goldstein SR, Timor-Tritsch E, editors. Ultrasound in gynecology. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1995. p. 103–14.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tessler FN, Perrella RR, Fleischer AL, Grant EG. Endovaginal sonographic diagnosis of dilated Fallopian tubes. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:523–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bulas DI, Ahlstrom PA, Sivit CJ, Blask ARN, O’Donnell RM. Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic evaluation. Radiology. 1992;183:435–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patten RM, Vincent LM, Wolner-Hanssen P, Thorpe Jr E. Pelvic Inflammatory disease: endovaginal sonography with laparoscopic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1990;9:681–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cacciatore B, Leminen A, Ingman-Freiberg S, Ylostalo P, Paavonen J. Transvaginal sonographic findings in ambulatory patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:912–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Romosan G, Bjartling C, Skoog L, Valentin L. Ultrasound for diagnosing acute salpingitis: a prospective observational diagnostic study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1569–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atri M, Tran CN, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Kintzen GM. Accuracy of endovaginal sonography for the detection of Fallopian tubes. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:523–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taipale P, Tarjanne H, Ylostalo P. Transvaginal sonography in suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:430–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Timor-tritsch IE, Rottem S, Lewitt N. The Fallopian tube. In: Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, editors. Transvaginal sonography. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1991. p. 131–44.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bellah RD, Rosenberg HK. Transvaginal ultrasound in a children’s hospital: is it worthwhile? Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21:570–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patel MD, Acord DL, Young SW. Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):1033–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Valentin L. Imaging in gynecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(6):881–906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    de Wit W, Gowrising CJ, Kuik DJ, Lens JW, Schats R. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1696–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, Thorburn J, Janson PO, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2762–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Tsymbal T. Three-dimensional ultrasound inversion rendering technique facilitates the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38(7):372–6. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteaguado A, Tsymbal J, et al. Three-dimensional inversion rendering: a new sonographic technique and its use in gynecology. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:681.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Guerriero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Silvia Ajossa
    • 2
  • Valentina Corda
    • 2
  • Maura Perniciano
    • 1
  • Alba Piras
    • 1
  • Alessandra Cappai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio CasulaMonserrato, CagliariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, University Hospital Duilio CasulaMonserrato, CagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations