A Semiotic-Conceptual Analysis of Conceptual Learning

  • Uta Priss
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9717)

Abstract

While learning mathematics or computer science, beginning students often encounter significant problems with abstract concepts. In both subjects there tend to be large numbers of students failing the class or dropping out during the first semesters. There is a substantial existing body of literature on this topic from a didactic perspective, but in our opinion an investigation from a semiotic-conceptual perspective could provide further insights and specifically analyse the difficulties encountered when learning abstract concepts. This means that both the complexities of the representations of abstract concepts and the conceptual content itself are modelled and investigated separately and in combination with each other. In our opinion a semiotic analysis of the representations is often missing from didactic theories. And in particular, as far as we know, there are not yet any formal mathematical approaches to modelling learning difficulties with respect to semiotic and conceptual structures. Semiotic-Conceptual Analysis (SCA) as presented in this paper aims to fill that niche.

References

  1. Albert, D., Lukas, J. (eds.): Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  2. Dubinsky, E., Mcdonald, M.A.: APOS: a constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In: Holton, D., Artigue, M., Kirchgräber, U., Hillel, J., Niss, M., Schoenfeld, A. (eds.) The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. ICMI Study Series, vol. 7, pp. 275–282. Springer, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Falmagne, J.-C., Albert, D., Doble, D., Eppstein, D., Hu, X.: Knowledge Spaces: Applications in Education. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Goguen, J.: An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design. In: Nehaniv, C.L. (ed.) CMAA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1562, pp. 242–291. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Prediger, S.: How to develop mathematics-for-teaching and for understanding: the case of meanings of the equal sign. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 13, 73–93 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Priss, U.: Relational concept analysis: semantic structures in dictionaries and lexical databases. Ph.D. thesis, Verlag Shaker, Aachen (1998)Google Scholar
  8. Priss, U.: Signs and formal concepts. In: Eklund, P. (ed.) ICFCA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2961, pp. 28–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Priss, U., Riegler, P., Jensen, N.: Using FCA for modelling conceptual difficulties in learning processes. In: Domenach, F., Ignatov, D., Poelmans, J. (eds.) Contributions to the 10th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2012), pp. 161–173 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. Priss, U.: An introduction to semiotic-conceptual analysis with formal concept analysis. In: Yahia, S., Konecny, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 135–146 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uta Priss
    • 1
  1. 1.Zentrum für erfolgreiches Lehren und LernenOstfalia University of Applied SciencesWolfenbüttelGermany

Personalised recommendations