Advertisement

Scrutinizing Hashtag Activism in the #MustFall Protests in South Africa in 2015

What role did media play in hashtag activism during the #RhodesMustFall and #FeesMustFall protests in South Africa in 2015?
  • Glenda DanielsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The #hashtag in Twitter is hailed as a powerful tool for interaction. It can, for instance, spread and deepen democracy via citizen engagement through the inclusion of new voices into public spaces, and in fact can help create new public spaces. This research is a critical analysis of journalists’ and media personalities’ use of Twitter during the #Rhodes Must Fall campaign in South Africa. The article examines social media practices by analysing responses to the University of Cape Town’s #Rhodes must fall campaign in 2015. The methods deployed are both quantitative and qualitative. First, tweets are extracted via an innovative API extraction method to assess how many people in South Africa engaged during the debate using the hashtag, and of these how many were media personalities and mainstream journalists. The commonplace assumption here is that the hashtag is used to engage with people and provoke responses. However, the question here is to what extent did this occur? Theoretically, the article is embedded in democratic theory, accepting participative democracy as a foregrounder but moving beyond this to the radical democracy model, which asserts that the more diverse voices in the various disparate publics, the more expansive and deeper democracy can be. Deploying radical democracy’s theory vis-a-vis agonistic struggle in robust and clashing spaces and views, this research scrutinizes how the new media platform Twitter, is fulfilling this potential. The article will delineate what the Rhodes Must Fall campaign was about, how the hashtag was used during the campaign, and how mainstream journalists and media personalities engaged, or did not engage, with the various publics during the campaign which captured the national and international imaginations.

Keywords

Social Medium Public Sphere Black Student Digital Divide Traditional Medium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bohler-Muller, N., and Van Der Merwe, C. (2011). The potential of social media to impact socio-political change on the African continent.Google Scholar
  2. Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. City Press. (2015a, September 6). Our lives don’t matter.Google Scholar
  4. City Press. (2015b, September 6). shut up and listen.Google Scholar
  5. City Press. (2015c, September 6). We can’t pretend.Google Scholar
  6. City Press. (2015d, September 8). Serving white interests.Google Scholar
  7. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daily Maverick. (2015, April). It’s not about the statues, Stupid!Google Scholar
  9. Daniels, G. (2012). Fight for democracy: The ANC and the media in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, G. (2014). State of the newsroom South Africa 2014: Disruptions accelerated. Johannesburg: Wits Journalism.Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (2004). The last of the rogue states: The democracy to come. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3), 232–341. Maryland: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dirk, N., and Petersen, C. (2015, December 9). Rhodes tweets top of trends on Twitter. The Star.Google Scholar
  13. Falcke, D. (2014). Developed the method for Twitter extractions.Google Scholar
  14. Falkoff, N. (2016, February 17). Wiser seminar entitled: Intersectional writing in times of protest: Conversations with young women journalists. Johannesburg: Wits University.Google Scholar
  15. Mail & Guardian. (2015, August 28–September 3). Suspended Wits 7 violent of vexed.Google Scholar
  16. Manji, F. 2008. Alternative media for social change in Africa. Myths and realities. Paper presented to Cape Town International Book Fair.Google Scholar
  17. McNair, B. (2006). Cultural chaos: Journalism, news and power in a globalised world. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mouffe, C. (2005). The democratic paradox. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Moyo, D. (2009). Citizen journalism and the parallel market of information in Zimbabwe’s 2008 election. Journalism Studies, 10(4), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moyo, L. (2014). Beyond the newsroom monopolies: Citizen journalism as the practice of freedom in Zimbabwe. In E. Thorsen and S. Allan (Eds.), Citizen journalism: Global voices (pp. 273–288). London: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  21. Mpemnyama, Z. (2016, February 17). Wiser seminar entitled: Intersectional writing in times of protest: Conversations with young women journalists. Johannesburg: Wits University.Google Scholar
  22. Muneri, C. (2016). Chapter entitled: Beyond blind optimism: The case of citizen journalism in the struggle for democracy in Zimbabwe in the book. In B. Mutsvairo (Ed.), Participatory politics and citizen journalism in a networked Africa (p. 179). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Ngcaweni, W. (2015, October 25). Superiority sadly seems alive and well. The Sunday Independent.Google Scholar
  24. Patel, A. (2016, February 17). Wiser seminar entitled: Intersectional writing in times of protest: Conversations with young women journalists. Johannesburg: Wits University.Google Scholar
  25. Sandoval, M., & Fuch, C. (2010). Towards a critical theory of alternative media. Telematics and Informatics, 27, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stassen, W. (2010). Your news in 14 characters: Exploring the role of social media in journalism. Global Media Journal, African edition, 4(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  27. The Times. (2015a, August 27). Listen up, old South Africa.Google Scholar
  28. The Times. (2015b, September 2). Campuses seething.Google Scholar
  29. The Times. (2015c, September 3). The storm rages, unabated.Google Scholar
  30. The Times. (2016, January14). History is not a blank page on which we write our own version.Google Scholar
  31. Van Dijk, J. (2006). The network society. Social aspects of new media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Van Noort, E., & Verweij, P. (2013). Journalist Twitter networks, public debates and relationships in South Africa. Digital Journalism, 2(1), 98–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations