Advertisement

A Fluid–Structure Interaction Algorithm Using Radial Basis Function Interpolation Between Non-Conforming Interfaces

  • Simone Deparis
  • Davide Forti
  • Alfio Quarteroni
Chapter
Part of the Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology book series (MSSET)

Abstract

We consider a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problem discretized by finite elements featuring two different grids that do not necessarily agree on the interface separating the computational domain of the fluid from the one of the structure. After identifying a master domain (the structural domain) and a slave domain (the fluid domain), we build up two radial basis function (RBF) inter-grid operators, one Π fs from master to slave, and the other Π sf from slave to master. Then, we enforce the kinematic condition by equating the fluid velocity at the interface as the image through Π fs of the temporal derivative of the structural displacement. On the other hand, the dynamic interface condition is fulfilled via a variational method where the strong form of the structural normal stress is obtained as the image through Π sf of the strong form of the fluid normal stress. A numerical verification is carried out for a straight cylinder and for a patient-specific arterial bypass geometry. This new method is easy to implement and optimally accurate.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research of D. Forti was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (SNF), project No. 140184. The research of S. Deparis and A. Quarteroni was partly supported by the PASC project “Integrative HPC Framework for Coupled Cardiac Simulations”. We acknowledge Prof. P. Gervasio for the fruitful discussions and suggestions. We gratefully acknowledge the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) for providing us the CPU resources under project ID s475. We also thank the LifeV community.

References

  1. 1.
    Bazilevs, Y., Calo, V.M., Cottrell, J.A., Hughes, T.J.R., Reali, A., Scovazzi, G.: Variational multiscale residual–based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (1–4), 173–201 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bazilevs, Y., Takizawa, K., Tezduyar, T.E.: Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications. Wiley Series in Computational Mechanics. Wiley, Chichester (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernardi, C., Maday, Y., Patera, A.T.: A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the mortar element method. In: Brezis, H., Lions, J.L. (eds.) Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications, pp. 13–51. Wiley, London/New York (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colciago, C., Deparis, S., Quarteroni, A.: Comparisons between reduced order models and full 3D models for fluid-structure interaction problems in haemodynamics. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 265, 120–138 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crosetto, P., Deparis, S., Fourestey, G., Quarteroni, A.: Parallel algorithms for fluid-structure interaction problems in haemodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 (4), 1598–1622 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deparis, S., Forti, D., Quarteroni, A.: A rescaled localized radial basis function interpolation on non-Cartesian and nonconforming grids. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36 (6), A2745–A2762 (2011/2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deparis, S., Forti, D., Gervasio, P., Quarteroni, A.: INTERNODES: an accurate interpolation-based method for coupling the Galerkin solutions of PDEs on subdomains featuring non-conforming interfaces. Comput. Fluids (2016, in press).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deparis, S., Forti, D., Grandperrin, G., Quarteroni, A.: FaCSI: a block parallel preconditioner for fluid-structure interaction in hemodynamics (2015, under review)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klöppel, T., Popp, A., Küttler, U., Wall, W.A.: Fluid–structure interaction for non-conforming interfaces based on a dual mortar formulation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200, 3111–3126 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marchandise, E., Crosetto, P., Geuzaine, C., Remacle, J.F., Sauvage, E.: Quality open source mesh generation for cardiovascular flow simulations. In: Ambrosi, D., Quarteroni, A., Rozza, G. (eds.) Modeling of Physiological Flows, pp. 395–414. Springer, Milan (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wohlmuth, B.I.: A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the Lagrange multiplier. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (3), 989–1012 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Deparis
    • 1
  • Davide Forti
    • 1
  • Alfio Quarteroni
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.EPFL – École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.MOX - Politecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations