Conclusion: Interdisciplinary Links and Future Directions

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This concluding chapter draws connections between the different chapters to further highlight the key themes of this book. The separate contributions are assessed in terms of what they mean when considered together for the study of international conflict. The authors also sketch where future research could be most profitable.

Keywords

Foreign Policy Cognitive Bias Interdisciplinary Approach International Conflict World Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cesarini, David, et al. 2009. Genetic Variation in Preferences for Giving and Risk Taking. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2), May: 809–842.Google Scholar
  2. Coates, John. 2012. The Hour Between Dog and Wolf. How Risk Taking Transforms Us, Body and Mind. New York: Penguin Press/Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Danchev, Alex. 2012. Cezanne: A Life. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  4. Flyvberg, Bent. 2008. Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. European Planning Studies 16(Jan.): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frydman, Cary, et al. 2011. MAOA-L Carriers are Better at Making Optimal Financial Decisions Under Risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278 (1714), July: 2053–2059.Google Scholar
  6. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  7. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kandel, Eric R. 2012. The Age of Insight. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Lobell, Steven E., Norrin M. Ripsman, and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro (ed). 2009. Neorealism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Picketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Boston, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
  11. Rosenau, James. 2008. People Count! Networked Individuals in Global Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  13. Yetiv, Steve A. 2004; 2nd ed. 2011. Explaining Foreign Policy: U.S. Decision-Making & the Persian Gulf War. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International RelationsUSCLos Angeles, CAUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political Science and GeographyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolk, VAUSA

Personalised recommendations