Advertisement

Reintegration of First- and Second-Generation Children Returned to Burundi: A Multidimensional Approach

  • Sonja Fransen
  • Melissa Siegel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes a study about the reintegration of child returnees in Burundi, a small conflict-affected country that received more than 600,000 former refugees after the conflict ended in 2000. Using unique, nationally representative data collected in 2011, the authors compare the living conditions of both first- and second-generation child returnees to those of children who had not lived abroad; they used a multidimensional approach that encompasses six reintegration dimensions. The findings show a mixed picture regarding the reintegration into Burundi of child returnees, which supports the use of a multidimensional approach to disentangle the various areas of well-being for returning child refugees. The results highlight that more targeting of return households, and the children that reside within them, is needed in specific areas.

Keywords

Security Dimension Return Migration Multidimensional Poverty Multidimensional Approach Financial Inclusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Alkire, S., and J. Foster. 2011. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics 95: 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire, S., and M. E. Santos. 2010. Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries. OPHI Working Paper 38, Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Baulch, B., and E. Masset. 2003. Do Monetary and Nonmonetary Indicators Tell the Same Story About Chronic Poverty? A Study of Vietnam in the 1990s. World Development 31: 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, R., and S. Gent. 2006. Sustainable Return in Post-Conflict Contexts. International Migration 44: 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, R., K. Koser, K. Monk, G. Atfield, L. D’Onofrio, and R. Tiemoko. 2004. Understanding Voluntary Return. Home Office Report 50/04, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  6. Bourguignon, F., and S. Chakravarty. 2003. The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality 1: 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, J., and N. Finch. 2003. Overlaps in Dimensions of Poverty. Journal of Social Policy 32: 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bundervoet, T. 2009. Livestock, Land and Political Power: The 1993 Killings in Burundi. Journal of Peace Research 46: 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunte, T., and L. Monnier. 2011. Mediating Land Conflict in Burundi: A Documentation and Analysis Project. Bujumbura: ACCORD.Google Scholar
  10. Cassarino, J.-P. 2004. Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 6(2): 253–279.Google Scholar
  11. Cassarino, J. P. (ed.). 2008. Return Migrants to the Maghreb, Reintegration and Development Challenges. San Domenico di Fiesolo: European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  12. ———. (ed.). 2014. Reintegration and Development. San Domenico di Fiesolo: European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Chimni, B.S. 2002. Refugees, Return and Reconstruction of “Post-Conflict” Societies: A Critical Perspective. International Peacekeeping 9(2): 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crisp, J. 2000. Africa’s Refugees: Patterns, Problems and Policy Challenges. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 18(2): 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fransen, S. 2011. Migration and Development: A World in Motion. Fieldwork Report Burundi: Methodology and Sampling. Maastricht: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.Google Scholar
  16. Fransen, S. 2015. The Socio-Economic Sustainability of Refugee Return: Insights from Burundi. Population, Space and Place. Early view available online.  10.1002/psp.1976.Google Scholar
  17. Fransen, S., and K. Kuschminder. 2012. Reintegration After Repatriation: The Long-Term Challenges of Return Migration in Burundi. New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper No. 242. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  18. Fransen, S., and K. Kuschminder. 2014. Lessons Learned from Refugee Return Settlement Policies in Africa: A Case Study on Burundi’s Rural Integrated Villages Approach. Refugee Survey Quarterly 33 (1): 59–67.Google Scholar
  19. Gassmann, F., M. Siegel, M. Vanore, and J. Waidler. 2012. The Impact of Migration on Elderly Left Behind in Moldova. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2012-082.
  20. ———. 2013. The Impact of Migration on Children Left Behind in Moldova. UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2013-043.
  21. International Crisis Group (ICG). 1999. Burundian Refugees in Tanzania: The Key Factor to the Burundi Peace Process. Nairobi: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
  22. International Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE). 2013. EiE Crisis Spotlight: Burundi. New York: INEE. http://www.ineesite.org/en/crisis-spotlights/burundi.
  23. International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2004. Glossary on Migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  24. Koser, K., and K. Kuschminder. 2015. Comparative Research on the Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration of Migrants. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  25. Laderchi, C.R., R. Saith, and F. Steward. 2003. Does It Matter that We Do Not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches. Oxford Development Studies 31: 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, M. 1992. Human Functioning and Social Justice. Political Theory 20: 202–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rema Ministries. 2012. “Umenga Ntituri Abarundi” Rethinking Reintegration in Burundi. Bujumbura: Rema Ministries.Google Scholar
  29. Rogge, J.R. 1994. Repatriation of Refugees: A Not So Simple ‘Optimum’ Solution. In When Refugees Go Home, ed. T. Allen, and H. Morsink. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).Google Scholar
  30. Sen, Amartya. 1976. Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement. Econometrica 44: 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 1982. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1993. Capability and Well-Being. In The Quality of Life, ed. M. Nussbaum, and Amartya Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Siegel, Melissa, and Jennifer Waidler. 2012. Migration and Multi-Dimensional Poverty in Moldovan Communities. Eastern Journal of European Studies 3: 105–119.Google Scholar
  35. Sommers, M. 2013. Adolescents and Violence: Lessons from Burundi. Institute of Development Policy and Management. University of Antwerp. Discussion Paper #2013.02.Google Scholar
  36. UNHCR. 1996. Handbook Voluntary Repatriation: International Protection. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2002. Statistiques Demographiques du Rapatriement. Bujumbura: UNHCR Burundi Data Unit/Protection.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2004. Handbook for Repatriation and Reintegration Activities. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2010. Evaluation of the Protracted Refugee Situation (PRS) for Burundians in Tanzania. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2014. Statistiques Demographiques du Rapatriement. Bujumbura: UNHCR Burundi Data Unit/Protection.Google Scholar
  41. UNICEF. 2008. Language a Challenge for Children Returning to Burundi. New York: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/burundi_45682.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2015.
  42. ———. 2009. UNICEF Humanitarian Action Burundi in 2009. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja Fransen
    • 1
  • Melissa Siegel
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Maastricht Graduate School of GovernanceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations