Advertisement

Airborne Laserscanning in Archaeology: Maturing Methods and Democratizing Applications

  • Rachel OpitzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences book series (QMHSS)

Abstract

Archaeologists have been using airborne laserscanning (ALS) for over a decade in projects ranging from heritage management schemes for post-industrial uplands in the UK or state-managed forests in Germany to research on cities now obscured by tropical jungle canopy in Central Mexico. The basic methods for the analysis and interpretation of this data have matured considerably and data is increasing available. Building on this increasing accessibility and an established basic methodology, archaeologists are addressing a growing variety of ground conditions and research and heritage management objectives through this technology. With this diversification comes the need to adapt the basic methods used to new landscapes and types of archaeological remains, and to integrate the practice of working with ALS with diverse fieldwork and research practices.

Keywords

Airborne laserscanning/lidar Topography Archaeological survey Aerial archaeology Landscape archaeology 

References

  1. Ainsworth, S., Oswald, A. and Went, D. (2013) Remotely acquired, not remotely sensed: using lidar as a field survey tool. In Opitz, R. S. and Cowley, D. C. (eds.) Interpreting Archaeological Topography. 3D Data, Visualisation and Observation. AARG Occasional Paper 5. Oxbow Books: Oxford, 206–22.Google Scholar
  2. Axelsson, P., 1999. Processing of laser scanner data—algorithms and applications, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54:138–147.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, R., Welham, K., & Ford, A. (2012) A comparison of visualization techniques for models created from airborne laser scanned data. Archaeological Prospection, 19(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
  4. Brodu, N., & Lague, D. (2012) 3D terrestrial lidar data classification of complex natural scenes using a multi-scale dimensionality criterion: Applications in geomorphology. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 68, 121–134.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, A. F., Chase, D. Z., Weishampel, J. F., Drake, J. B., Shrestha, R. L., Slatton, K. C., & Carter, W. E. (2011). Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(2), 387–398.Google Scholar
  6. Chase, A. F., Chase, D. Z., Fisher, C. T., Leisz, S. J., & Weishampel, J. F. (2012) Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(32), 12916–12921.Google Scholar
  7. Chauve, A., Mallet, C., Bretar, F., Durrieu, S., Deseilligny, M. P., & Puech, W. (2007) Processing full-waveform lidar data: modelling raw signals. In International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences 2007, 102–107.Google Scholar
  8. Cherry, J. F., Ryzewski, K., & Leppard, T. P. (2012) Multi-period landscape survey and site risk assessment on Montserrat, West Indies. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 7(2), 282–302.Google Scholar
  9. Collis, J. (2013) The Development of Archaeological Thought as Evidenced in theYorkshire Archaeological Journal. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 2013; 85(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
  10. Crow, P. and Moffat, A.J. (2005). The management of the archaeological resource in wooded landscapes: an environmental perspective. Conservation and management of archaeological sites. 7, 103–116. Google Scholar
  11. Darvill, T. (2014) Ancient monuments in the countryside: an archaeological management review. English Heritage Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, D. H., Fletcher, R. J., Pottier, C., Chevance, J. B., Soutif, D., Tan, B. S.,& Boornazian, G. (2013) Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(31), 12595–12600.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, C. T., & Leisz, S. J. (2013) New Perspectives on Purépecha Urbanism Through the Use of LiDAR at the Site of Angamuco, Mexico. In Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space (pp. 199–210) Springer New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hesse, R. (2010) LiDAR‐derived Local Relief Models–a new tool for archaeological prospection. Archaeological Prospection, 17(2), 67–72.Google Scholar
  15. Hesse, R. (2014) Geomorphological traces of conflict in high-resolution elevation models. Applied Geography, 46, 11–20.Google Scholar
  16. Gheyle, W., Dossche, R., Bourgeois, J., Stichelbaut, B., & Van Eetvelde, V. (2014) Integrating Archaeology and Landscape Analysis for the Cultural Heritage Management of a World War I Militarised Landscape: The German Field Defences in Antwerp. Landscape Research, 39(5), 502–522.Google Scholar
  17. Kokalj, Z., Zaksek, K., & Ostir, K. (2011) Application of sky-view factor for the visualisation of historic landscape features in lidar-derived relief models. Antiquity, 85(327), 263–273.Google Scholar
  18. Mlekuž, D. (2012) Messy landscapes: lidar and the practices of landscaping. In R. S. Opitz, & Cowley, D. C. (Eds.), Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications, AARG Occassional Paper 5. Oxbow Books: Oxford, 90–101.Google Scholar
  19. Mlekuž, D. (2013) Skin Deep: LiDAR and Good Practice. In C. Corsi, B. Slapsak, and F. Vermeulen. Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics: Non-invasive Survey of Complex Archaeological Sites, 113–129. New York, Dordrecht and London: Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  20. Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014) UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Applied Geomatics, 6(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  21. Opitz, R.S. and D.C. Cowley (eds.) 2012. Interpreting archaeological topography: Lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  22. Opitz, R., & Limp, F. (2015) Recent Developments in HDSM for Archaeology: Implications for Practice and Theory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1).Google Scholar
  23. Opitz, R., & Nuninger, L. (2014) Point Clouds Segmentation of Mixed Scenes with Archeological Standing Remains: A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Scale Iterative Approach. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, 3(2), 287–304.Google Scholar
  24. Opitz, R., Ryzewski, K., Cherry, J. and Moloney, B. (2015) Using Airborne LiDAR Survey to explore Historic-era archaeological landscapes of Montserrat in the Eastern Caribbean. Journal of Field Archaeology, 41(1): 523–541.Google Scholar
  25. Pluckhahn, T. J., and Thompson, V. (2012) Integrating LiDAR Data and Conventional Mapping of the Fort Center Site in South-Central Florida: A Comparative Approach, Journal of Field Archaeology 37(4): 289–301.Google Scholar
  26. Raab, A., Takla, M., Raab, T., Nicolay, A., Schneider, A., Rösler, H., & Bönisch, E. (2015) Pre-industrial charcoal production in Lower Lusatia (Brandenburg, Germany): detection and evaluation of a large charcoal-burning field by combining archaeological studies, GIS-based analyses of shaded-relief maps and dendrochronological age determination. Quaternary International, 367, 111–122.Google Scholar
  27. Randall, A. R. (2014) LiDAR-aided Reconnaissance and Reconstruction of Lost Landscapes: An Example of Freshwater Shell Mounds (ca. 7500-500 CAL B.P.) in Northeastern Florida, Journal of Field Archaeology 39(2): 162–179.Google Scholar
  28. Ryzewski, K., & Cherry, J. F. (2015) Struggles of a Sugar Society: Surveying Plantation-Era Montserrat, 1650–1850. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 19(2), 356–383.Google Scholar
  29. Schindling, J., & Gibbes, C. (2014) LiDAR as a tool for archaeological research: a case study. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 6(4), 411–423.Google Scholar
  30. Štular, B., Kokalj, Ž., Oštir, K., & Nuninger, L. (2012) Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of archaeological features. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(11), 3354–3360.Google Scholar
  31. Watts, A. C., Ambrosia, V. G., & Hinkley, E. A. (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: Classification and considerations of use. Remote Sensing, 4(6), 1671–1692.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Virtualization and Applied Spatial Technologies (CVAST) and Department of AnthropologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations