Design and Implementation of a Low Cost Virtual Rugby Decision Making Interactive

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9768)

Abstract

The paper describes the design and implementation of a novel low cost virtual rugby decision making interactive for use in a visitor centre. Original laboratory-based experimental work in decision making in rugby, using a virtual reality headset [1] is adapted for use in a public visitor centre, with consideration given to usability, costs, practicality and health and safety. Movement of professional rugby players was captured and animated within a virtually recreated stadium. Users then interact with these virtual representations via use of a low-cost sensor (Microsoft Kinect) to attempt to block them. Retaining the principles of perception and action, egocentric viewpoint, immersion, sense of presence, representative design and game design the system delivers an engaging and effective interactive to illustrate the underlying scientific principles of deceptive movement. User testing highlighted the need for usability, system robustness, fair and accurate scoring, appropriate level of difficulty and enjoyment.

Keywords

Perception and action HCI Game design Interactive Sport 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project described was carried out on behalf of Ulster Rugby, as part of their new Nevin Spence Centre which is dedicated to Nevin Spence. Funding was provided by the Department of Culture, Art and Leisure and the Northern Ireland Executive. The project also acknowledges Image Studio, South West College, Enniskillen. The project also acknowledges the precursor work carried out by [1].

References

  1. 1.
    Brault, S, Bideau, B, Kulpa, R, Craig, C.M.: Detecting deception in movement: the case of the side-step in rugby. PLoS One (2012).  10.1371/jounral.pone.0037494
  2. 2.
    MacDonald, G.F., Alsford, S.: The museum as information utility. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 10, 305–311 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Croft, H., Kardin Suwarganda, E., Faris Syed Omar, S.: Development and application of a live transmitting player-mounted head camera. J. Sports Technol. 6(2), 97–110 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhawan, A., Cummins, A., Spratford, W., Dessing, J.C., Craig, C.: Development of a novel immersive interactive virtual reality cricket simulator for cricket batting. In: Chung, P., Soltoggio, A., Dawson, C.W., Meng, Q., Pain, M. (eds.) 10th International Symposium in Computer Science in Sports (ISCSS 2015). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 203–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watson, G., Brault, S., Kulpa, R., Bideau, B., Butterfield, J., Craig, C.: Judging the ‘passability’ of dynamic gaps in a virtual rugby environment. Hum. Mov. Sci. 30(5), 942–956 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Correia, V., Arajújo, D., Cummins, A., Craig, C.M.: Perceiving and acting upon spaces in a VR rugby task: expertise effects in affordance detection and task achievement. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 34(3), 305–321 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craig, C., Bastin, J., Montagne, G.: How information guides movement: intercepting curved free kicks in soccer. Hum. Mov. Sci. 30(5), 931–941 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lombard, M., Ditton, T.: At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 3, 0 (1997). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
  9. 9.
    van der Schuemie, M.J., Straaten, P., Krijn, M., van der Mast, C.: Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 4(2), 183–201 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunswik, E.: Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments, 2nd edn., rev. & enl. University of California Press, Berkeley (1956)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Araújo, D., Davids, K., Serpa, S.: An ecological approach to expertise effects in decision-making in a simulated sailing regatta. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 6(6), 671–692 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Craig, C., Watson, G.: An affordance based approach to decision making in sport: discussing a novel methodological framework. Revista de psicología del deporte: RDP; revista semestral de psicología (Palma) 20(2), 689–708 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Craig, C., Cummins, A.: New methods for studying perception and action coupling. In: Baker, J., Farrow, D. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Sport Expertise. Routledge, London (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miles, H.C., Pop, S.R., Watt, S.J., Lawrence, G.P., John, N.W.: A review of virtual environments for training in ball sports. Comput. Graph. 36(6), 714–726 (2011). In 2011 Joint Symposium on Computational Aesthetics (CAe), Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering (NPAR), and Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (SBIM)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bideau, B., Kulpa, R., Menardais, S., Fradet, L., Multon, F., Delamarche, P., Arnaldi, B.: Real handball goalkeeper vs. virtual handball thrower. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 12(4), 411–421 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vignais, N., Bideau, B., Craig, C., Brault, S., Multon, F., Delamarche, P., Kulpa, R.: Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goalkeeper’s motor response? J. Sports Sci. Med. 8(4), 501–508 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zahorik, P., Jenison, R.L.: Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 7(1), 78–89 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vignais, N., Kulpa, R., Craig, C., Brault, S., Multon, F., Bideau, B.: Influence of the graphical levels of detail of a virtual thrower on the perception of the movement. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 19(3), 243–252 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Craig, C.: Understanding perception and action in sport: how can virtual reality technology help? Sports Technol. 6(4) (2013, 2014). doi: 10.1080/19346182.2013.855224
  21. 21.
    Pauli, K.P., May, D.R., Gilson, R.L.: Fun and games: the influence of a playful pre-training intervention and microcomputer playfullness on computer-related performance. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 28(4), 407 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prensky, M.: Computer games and learning: digital game-based learning. In: Raessens, J., Goldstein, J. (eds.) Handbook of Computer Game Studies, p. 99 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harpers Perennial (1990)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sinclair, J., Hingston, P., Masek, M.: Considerations for the design of exergames. In: GRAPHITE 2007, Perth, Western Australia, 1–4 December 2007Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salonius-Pasternak, D.E., Gelfond, H.S.: The next level of research on electronic play: potential benefits and contextual influences for children and adolescents. Hum. Technol. 1(1), 5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neal, L.: Implications of computer games for systems design. In: Diapeer, D., Gilmore, D., Cockton, D., Shackel, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Third International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science Publishers (1990)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Isbister, K., Mueller, F.F.: Guidelines for the design of movement-based games and their relevance to HCI. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(3–4), 366–399 (2015). doi: 10.1080/07370024.2014.996647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen, J.: Flow in games (and everything else) - a well-designed game transports its players to their personal flow zones, delivering genuine feelings of pleasure and happiness. Commun. ACM 50(4), 31 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jorgensen, A.H.: Marrying HCI/usability and computer games: a preliminary look. In: NordiCHI 2004, Tampere, Finland, 23–27 October 2004Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Cognitive and Instructional Sciences Series (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyQueen’s University of BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations