Will o’the Wisp: Augmented Reality Navigation for Hikers

  • Catherine S. Johnson
  • Shambhavi Mahajan
  • Mehmet Ordu
  • Samyukta Sherugar
  • Bruce N. Walker
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 618)

Abstract

In this study we discuss the design of a non-intrusive navigational aid for amateur hikers and evaluate issues of trust and efficiency. We conceptualized an augmented reality interaction to project on-demand GPS directions in front of the hiker, and integrated the system into a hiking stick. We implemented an Arduino-powered prototype to evaluate the concept, interactions, and form factor. Evaluation methods include heuristic evaluations with an expert panel, followed by a round of design iteration. This was proceeded by task-based usability testing with amateur hikers. Our results confirm that hikers adapted easily to the new interaction, though trust in the device was less forthcoming. Data also confirms the efficiency of the projected cues compared to a traditional paper map.

Keywords

Augmented reality Navigation Hiking Arduino Usability testing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr. Carrie Bruce for her insights and support throughout the project, as well as Clement Zheng and Harrison Daniels for their technical assistance with prototype development.

References

  1. 1.
    Darken, R.P., Peterson, B.: Spatial orientation, wayfinding, and representation. In: Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 493–518 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Posti, M., Schöning, J., Häkkilä, J.: Unexpected journeys with the HOBBIT: the design and evaluation of an asocial hiking app. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 637–646. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heuten, W., Henze, N., Boll, S., Pielot, M.: Tactile wayfinder: a non-visual support system for wayfinding. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, pp. 172–181. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kray, C., Elting, C., Laakso, K., Coors, V.: Presenting route instructions on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 117–124. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Narzt, W., Pomberger, G., Ferscha, A., Kolb, D., Müller, R., Wieghardt, J., Hörtner, H., Lindinger, C.: Augmented reality navigation systems. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(3), 177–187 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas, B., Demczuk, V., Piekarski, W., Hepworth, D., Gunther, B.: A wearable computer system with augmented reality to support terrestrial navigation. In: Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 1998. Digest of Papers, pp. 168–171. IEEE (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 457–466. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salovaara, A., Lindqvist, A., Hasu, T., Häkkilä, J.: The phone rings but the user doesn’t answer: unavailability in mobile communication. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 503–512. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J.: 10 Heuristics for User Interface Design. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
  10. 10.
    Pielot, M., Henze, N., Boll, S.: Supporting map-based wayfinding with tactile cues. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, p. 23. ACM (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine S. Johnson
    • 1
  • Shambhavi Mahajan
    • 1
  • Mehmet Ordu
    • 1
  • Samyukta Sherugar
    • 1
  • Bruce N. Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaGeorgia

Personalised recommendations