Research Trends in Web Site Usability: A Systematic Review
The present study aims to review systematically all the studies of web site usability conducted in the years from 2005 to 2014, in order to present the research trends in usability issues of web sites. Regarding the inclusion criteria, 199 studies in total were included in the study. The major findings include that the most frequently addressed usability issue is navigation (excluding general usability issues), most of the studies used user-based Usability Evaluation Methods (UEMs), the most frequently used user-based methods are questionnaire and usability testing, and user experience of special user groups was not taken into consideration much. This comprehensive research on the usability issues of web sites provides important implications for future research by presenting the research trends. Also, it has the importance of being a reference for the reviewing process with the analysis structure of research questions, especially with the proposed classification for UEMs.
KeywordsUsability User experience Web site Systematic review Research trends Web design
This work was supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project number 40421.
- 1.Usability.gov (2015). Usability Evaluation Basics. http://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/usability-evaluation.html. Accessed 15 December 2015
- 3.Brinck, T., Gergle, D., Wood, S.: Designing Web Sites that Work. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Dumas, J., Redish, J.: A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Ablex Pub. Corp, Norwood (1993)Google Scholar
- 5.Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.: Handbook of Usability Testing. Wiley, Indianapolis (2008)Google Scholar
- 6.Iso.org (2015). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:dis:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed 15 December 2015
- 10.Cochrane Community Archive: Frequently Asked Questions - General: What is the difference between a protocol and a review? (2015). http://community-archive.cochrane.org/faq/general#t86n544. Accessed 8 February 2016
- 11.Torgerson, C.: Systematic Reviews. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele Univ. 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)Google Scholar
- 13.Rızvanoğlu, K.: Başka Türlü bir İletişim Mümkün II: Herkes için Web: Evrensel Kullanılabilirlik ve Tasarım. Punto Yayınları, İstanbul (2009). 9789750110399Google Scholar