A Process-Based Approach to Test Usability of Multi-platform Mobile Applications

  • Ingrid do Nascimento Mendes
  • Arilo Claudio Dias-NetoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9746)


In order to make a mobile application available to a wider audience, developers need to implement different versions on various mobile platforms. As consequence, the application needs to work properly in these platforms considering all quality characteristics. Usability is one of these characteristics that has direct impact on the success or failure of a mobile application. There are many studies that address mobile application tests, however they often do not handle multiplatform tests and also only cover few number of usability attributes used in mobile applications. In this paper, we propose a process-based approach that guides the activities related to usability testing in multiplatform mobile applications. To do that, specific guidelines and templates were proposed to support usability testing in a multiplatform environment. In addition, our approach comprises all seven usability attributes described in the PACMAD (People At the Centre of Mobile Application Development) model. In order to evaluate the proposed approach, a case study using the three current main mobile platforms was performed taking the Flipboard app as the sample mobile application.


Usability Mobile application Compatibility Testing 



The authors thank FAPEAM and INDT for financial support to conduct this research.


  1. 1.
    Flood, D., Germanakos, P., Harrison, R., Mc Caffery, F.: Estimating cognitive overload in mobile applications for decision support within the medical domain. In: 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Wroclaw, Poland (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ziefle, M.: The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of user and learnability of different mobile phones. Behav. Inf. Technol. 21, 303–311 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, D., Adipat, B.: Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 18(3), 293–308 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organization for Standardization, “ISO/IEC 25000 - Software engineering - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE”, ISO/IEC, March 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duh, H., Tan, G., Chen, V.: Usability evaluation for mobile device: a comparison of laboratory and field tests. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI). pp. 181–186 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nayebi, F., Desharnais, J.M., Abran, A.: The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation. In: 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical Computer Engineering CCECE, pp. 1–4 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kjeldskov, J., Stage, J.: New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60(5), 599–620 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison, R., Flood, D., Duce, D.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. 1(1), 1–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kjeldskov, J., Paay, J.: A longitudinal review of Mobile HCI research methods. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2012), pp. 69–78. doi: 10.1145/2371574.2371586
  10. 10.
    Huy, N.P., VanThanh, D.: Evaluation of mobile app paradigms. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM 2012), Ismail Khalil, pp. 25–30 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masoodian, M., Lane, N.: An empirical study of textual and graphical travel itinerary visualization using mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Australian User Interface Conference on User Interfaces vol. 18, pp. 11–18 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid do Nascimento Mendes
    • 1
  • Arilo Claudio Dias-Neto
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Computing (IComp)Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM)ManausBrazil

Personalised recommendations