Advertisement

Enhancing Personas for Well-Being e-Services and Product Service Systems

  • Sauro ViciniEmail author
  • Adriano Gariglio
  • Francesco Alberti
  • Elettra Oleari
  • Alberto Sanna
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9746)

Abstract

Personas are usually included in listings of standard methods within design. The study at hand explores how the Personas method gets integrated in a User-Centered process in the domain of hospital process re-engineering, health and well-being e-Services. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how new extensions of the Personas method allow to effectively tackle specific challenges related to the design process, and to support e-Services development since the early stages of a project. The outcomes of our evolution of the Personas method are accurate and valuable Personas profiles that designers, developers and whoever is part of the project team can trust when crafting the user experience (UX), the user interface (UI) and the other components of e-Services.

Keywords

Persona Profile Product Service System User Goal Dietary Plan Requirement Prioritization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research presented in this paper has been funded by the projects TAPPS (grant agreements No. 645119 http://www.tapps.eservices4life.org/), WITDOM (grant agreements No. 644371 http://www.witdom.eu/) and PAL (grant agreements No. 643783-RIA http://pal4u.eu/). All of them are part of European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (H2020-ICT-2014-1). We wish also to warmly thank the healthcare professionals of Ospedale San Raffaele (Milan, Italy) and the people involved in our studies for their precious and constant support.

References

  1. 1.
    empoWering prIvacy and securiTy in non-trusteD envirOnMents (WITDOM). witdom.eu
  2. 2.
    Personal Assistant for a healthy Lifestyle (PAL). pal4u.eu
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Trusted APPs for open CPS (TAPPS). www.tapps.eservices4life.org
  5. 5.
    Alan, F.W.: Privacy and Freedom. Bodley Head, London (1970)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alberti, F., Vicini, S.: Enhancing co-creation with privacy- and security-by-design methodologies. In: ENoLL Research Day Conference Proceedings 2015, pp. 7–15 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alberti, F., Vicini, S.: Enhancing co-creation with privacy- and security-by-design methodologies. In: ENoLL Conference Proceedings 2015, pp. 7–15 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arndt, J.: Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J. Mark. Res. 4, 291–295 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, A.: The inmates are running the asylum: [Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity], vol. 261, Sams Indianapolis (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deng, M., Wuyts, K., Scandariato, R., Preneel, B., Joosen, W.: A privacy threat analysis framework: supporting the elicitation and fulfillment of privacy requirements. Requir. Eng. 16(1), 3–32 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Djajadiningrat, J.P., Gaver, W.W., Fres, J.W.: Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 66–71. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Floyd, I.R., Cameron, J.M., Twidale, M.B.: Resolving incommensurable debates: a preliminary identification of persona kinds, attributes, and characteristics. Artifact 2(1), 12–26 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hjalmarsson, A., Gustafsson, E., Cronholm, S.: Exploring the use of personas in user-centered design of web-based e-services. In: IConference (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hood, L., Flores, M.: A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive p4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. New Biotechnol. 29(6), 613–624 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO. Human-centred design for interactive systems. Ergonomics of human system interaction Part 210 (ISO 9241-210) (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miaskiewicz, T., Kozar, K.A.: Personas and user-centered design: how can personas benefit product design processes? Des. Stud. 32(5), 417–430 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morton, A., Sasse, M.A.: Desperately seeking assurances: segmenting users by their information-seeking preferences. In: 2014 Twelfth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), pp. 102–111. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Nieters, J.E., Ivaturi, S., Ahmed, I.: Making personas memorable. In: CHI 2007 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1817–1824 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nissenbaum, H.: Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, Redwood City (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Norman, D.: Ad-hoc personas & empathetic focus. Jnd. org (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Notario, N., Crespo, A., Kung, A., Kroener, I., Le Métayer, D., Troncoso, C., del Álamo, J.M., Martín, Y.-S.: PRIPARE: a new vision on engineering privacy and security by design. In: CSP Forum 2014, pp. 65–76 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pruitt, J., Adlin, T.: The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Massachusetts (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pruitt, J., Grudin, J.: Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, pp. 1–15. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sinha, R.: Persona development for information-rich domains. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 830–831 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith, A., Humphreys, S., Heslington, L., La Placa, V., McVey, D., MacGregor, E.: The healthy foundations life-stage segmentation. research report no. 2: The qualitative analysis of the motivation segments. Project report, University of Greenwich, London, UK, July 2011Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ståhlbröst, A., Holst, M.: The living lab methodology handbook. Published by the SmartIES project, a transnational Nordic Smart City Living Lab Pilot (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vicini, S., Bellini, S., Sanna, A.: The city of the future living lab. Int. J. Autom. Smart Technol. 2(3), 201–208 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vicini, S., Bellini, S., Sanna, A.: User-driven service innovation in a smarter city living lab. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Service Science, ICSS, pp. 254–259 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vincent, C.J., Blandford, A.: The challenges of delivering validated personas for medical equipment design. Appl. Ergon. 45(4), 1097–1105 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Warren, S.D., Brandeis, L.D.: The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev. 4, 193–220 (1890)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wetterstrand, K.A.: DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP). www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts. Accessed 12 February 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sauro Vicini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adriano Gariglio
    • 1
  • Francesco Alberti
    • 1
  • Elettra Oleari
    • 1
  • Alberto Sanna
    • 1
  1. 1.e-Services for Life and Health, Fondazione Centro San RaffaeleMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations