Lean but not Mean UX: Towards a Spiral UX Design Model

  • Hang GuoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9746)


A new user experience design model was proposed and evaluated through a case study of a new product development project within a multinational software organization. Strengths and weaknesses in existing and proposed user experience design models were discussed based on how the following three challenges to user experience design – co-evolution of design problem and solution, organizational silos, conceptual integrity in design – affected user experience design quality and productivity through their impact on nature of design tasks and the social context of design activities.


User experience design Design models 


  1. 1.
    Arnowitz, J., Monica, H., Diana, G., Michael, A., Naomi, D.: The stakeholder forest: designing an expenses application for the enterprise. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 941–956. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boehm, B.W.: A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 21, 61–72 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks, F.P.: The mythical man-month. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coble, J.M., Karat, J., Kahn, M.G.: Maintaining a focus on user requirements throughout the development of clinical workstation software. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in computing Systems, pp. 170–177. ACM (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N.: A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun. ACM 31, 1268–1287 (1988). ACMCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Des. Stud. 22, 425–437 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gothelf, J., Seiden, J.: Lean UX: Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lightstone, E.: Lessons In Designing Great Enterprise Software (2015). Accessed 11 Dec 2015
  9. 9.
    Lorenzo, D.: Even business brands need effective UX.
  10. 10.
    Maher, M.L., Poon, J., Boulanger, S.: Formalising design exploration as co-evolution. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds.) Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD. IFIP–The International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 3–30. Springer, Dordrecht (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen, J.: Iterative user-interface design. Computer 26, 32–41 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oehlberg, L., Kyu, S., Jasmine, J., Alice, A., Björn, H.: Showing is sharing: building shared understanding in human-centered design teams with dazzle. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 2012), pp. 669–678. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1992), pp. 362–369. ACM, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peffers, K., Tuure, T., Marcus, A.R., Samir, C.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Royce, W.W.: Managing the development of large software systems, Los Angeles (1970)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saffer, D.: Microinteractions: Designing with Details. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schön, D.: Educating the reflective practitioner (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SAP SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations