Exploring Information Needs of Using Battery Swapping System for Riders

  • Fei-Hui HuangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9735)


In order to improve penetration in Taiwan’s electric two wheeler (E2W) market to decrease emissions of pollutants generated by scooters, a battery swapping model is proposed to overcome battery limitations (e.g., expensive purchase price, short lifetime, limited driving range per charge, long charging time, and inconvenient charging). This study aims to understand individuals’ information needs of using battery swap station (BSS) and, furthermore, providing several suggestions to improve BSS service for enhancing their willingness to accept a battery swapping system. In this study, a sample of 2,100 riders who had experienced a battery swapping service and filled out a post-experience questionnaire. The questionnaire elicited their traffic demands, the system acceptability, and purchase intention. The results showed that approximately 79.9 % of riders adopted the battery swapping system, but only 3.9 % were willing to purchase an e-scooter. Riders identified a number of problems with the self-service BSSs, including 42.8 % usability, 33.1 % environment, 18.7 % utility, and 5.4 % price. Finally, these problems were discussed, and addressed several recommend ways of resolving them.


Electric two wheelers (E2Ws) Battery swapping model System acceptability E-scooter Information needs 


  1. 1.
    Tsai, J.H., Hsu, Y.C., Weng, H.C., Lin, W.Y., Jeng, F.T.: Air-pollution emission factors from new and in-use motorcycles. Atmos. Environ. 34, 4747–4754 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirsch, D.A.: The Electric Vehicle and the Burden of History, pp. 153–162. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, London (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, J.Q.: Transit bus scheduling with limited energy. Transp. Sci. 48(4), 521–539 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, J.: Electric vehicle charging infrastructure assignment and power grid impacts assessment in Beijing. Energ. Policy 51, 544–557 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Worley, O., Klabjan, D.: Optimization of battery charging and purchasing at electric vehicle battery swap stations. In: IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Chicago, IL, 6–9 September 2011, pp. 1–4 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lombardi, P., Heuer, M., Styczynski, Z.: Battery switch station as storage system in an autonomous power system: optimization issue. In: IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, 25–29 July 2010, pp. 1–6 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D.F.: Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of HICSS 1999. IEEE Computer Society (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin Books, London (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grudin, J.: Utility and usability: research issues and development contexts. Interact. Comput. 4(2), 209–217 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bevan, N., Kirakowski, J., Maissel, J.: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on HCI, Stuttgart (1991).
  12. 12.
    ISO 9241-11: International standard first edition. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability (1998).

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing and Distribution ManagementOriental Institute of TechnologyPan-ChiaoTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations