Evaluating Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives in Human-Computer Interaction

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9735)

Abstract

New measures of well-being are drawing the attention of researchers and practitioner in human factors generally and human-computer interaction (HCI) in particular. Following in the footsteps of previous scholarly endeavours in hedonic well-being (HWB), this paper argues for the adoption of eudaimonic well-being (EWB) in explorations of well-being in HCI. To this end, I report on initial findings from research in which I have evaluated the impact of hedonic and eudaimonic motives on gaming experience using a validated instrument developed by psychologists and adapted for use in HCI contexts.

Keywords

Human factors Human-computer interaction Interaction design Quality of life Well-being Hedonia Eudaimonia Motivation Theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Drs. Peter Pennefather and Deb Fels for their help with exploring the psychological well-being literature. I would also like to thank Variety Village for recruitment assistance and providing the study space. Finally, I thank the participants for their interest and involvement. This work was funded in part by the National Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).

References

  1. 1.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. J. Happiness Stud. 9, 1–11 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waterman, A.S.: Two conceptions of happiness: contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64, 678–691 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seaborn, K., Fels, D.I., Pennefather, P.: A cooperative game for older powered chair users and their friends and family. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Consumer Electronics Society Games, Entertainment, Media Conference, pp. 52–55. IEEE, Toronto (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huta, V., Waterman, A.S.: Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. J. Happiness Stud. 15, 1425–1456 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ryan, R.M., Huta, V., Deci, E.L.: Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. J. Happiness Stud. 9, 139–170 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryff, C.D., Singer, B.H.: Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 9, 13–39 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huta, V., Ryan, R.M.: Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. J. Happiness Stud. 11, 735–762 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Helander, M.G.: Hedonomics—affective human factors design. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, pp. 978–982. SAGE, Baltimore (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helander, M.G., Tham, M.P.: Editorial: hedonomics—affective human factors design. Ergonomics 46, 1269–1282 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hancock, P.A., Pepe, A.A., Murphy, L.L.: Hedonomics: the power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergon. Des. 13, 8–14 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helander, M.G., Khalid, H.M.: Underlying theories of hedonomics for affective and pleasurable design. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, pp. 1691–1695. SAGE, Orlando (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seaborn, K., Fels, D.I., Pennefather, P.: Eudaimonia in human factors research and practice: foundations and conceptual framework applied to older adult populations. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, pp. 313–318. SCITEPRESS, Lisbon (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huta, V.: The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice. In: Joseph, S. (ed.) Positive Psychology in Practice: Promoting Human Flourishing in Work, Health, Education, and Everyday Life, 2nd edn., pp. 216–246. Wiley, Hoboken (2015). (Chap. 10) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asano, R., Igarashi, T., Tsukamoto, S.: The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities (HEMA) in Japan: the pursuit of well-being. Japan. J. Psychol. 85, 69–79 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huta, V., Pelletier, L.G., Baxter, D., Thompson, A.: How eudaimonic and hedonic motives relate to the well-being of close others. J. Positive Psychol. 7, 399–404 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations