Advertisement

A Method for Consensus Building Between Teachers and Learners in Higher Education Through Co-design Process

  • Ryota Sugino
  • Satoshi Mizoguchi
  • Koji Kimita
  • Keiichi Muramatsu
  • Tatsunori Matsui
  • Yoshiki Shimomura
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9735)

Abstract

Improving added value and productivity of services entails improving both value-in-exchange and value-in-use. Value-in-use is realized by value co-creation, where providers and receivers create value together. In higher education services, value-in-use comes from learners achieving learning outcomes (e.g., knowledge and skills) that are consistent with their learning goals. To enhance the learning outcomes of a learner, it is necessary to enhance and utilize the abilities of the teacher along with the abilities of the learner. To do this, however, the learner and the teacher need to build a consensus about their respective roles. Teachers need to provide effective learning content; learners need to choose the appropriate learning strategies by using the learning content through consensus building. This makes consensus building an important factor in value co-creation. However, methods to build a consensus about their respective roles may not be clearly established, making such consensus difficult. In this paper, we propose some strategies for consensus building between a teacher and a learner in value co-creation. We focus on a teacher and learner co-design and propose an analysis method to clarify a collaborative design process to realize value co-creation. We then analyze some counseling data obtained from a university class. This counseling aimed to build a consensus for value-in-use, learning outcomes, and learning strategies between the teacher and the learner.

Keywords

Consensus building Value co-creation Higher education Learning service 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26280114 and Research Institute of Science and Technology for Society (RISTEX).

References

  1. 1.
    McKenna, R.: Real-time marketing. Harv. Bus. Rev. 73(4), 87–89 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vargo, S.L., Lush, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68(1), 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sugihara, M.: The process of university students’ becoming autonomous and cooperative concerning their learning in general education: from the viewpoint of role reconstruction in the learning community. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimita, K., Nemoto, Y., Shimomura Y.: Value analysis method for learner centered instructional design. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Serviceology, ICServe 2014, pp. 143–144. The Society for Serviceology (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nemoto, Y., Uei, K., Kimita, K., Ishii, T., Shimomura, Y.: A conceptual model of co-growth of provider and receiver towards value co-creative service. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Serviceology, ICServe 2014, pp. 124–126 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kimita, K., Muto, K., Mizoguchi, S., Nemoto, Y., Ishi, T., Shimomura, Y.: Learning state model for value co-creative education services. In: Yamamoto, S., de Oliveira, N.P. (eds.) HIMI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9173, pp. 341–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20618-9_34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farris, D.R., Sage, A.P.: On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2, 149–174 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ravi, V., Shankar, R.: Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 72, 1011–1029 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh, M.D., Shankar, R., Narain, R., Agarwal, A.: An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 1(1), 28–40 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keller, J.M.: Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J. Instr. Dev. 10(3), 2–10 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryota Sugino
    • 1
  • Satoshi Mizoguchi
    • 1
  • Koji Kimita
    • 1
  • Keiichi Muramatsu
    • 2
  • Tatsunori Matsui
    • 3
  • Yoshiki Shimomura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of System DesignTokyo Metropolitan UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Science and EngineeringSaitama UniversitySaitamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Human SciencesWaseda UniversitySaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations