Advertisement

Efficient Implementation of Total FETI Solver for Graphic Processing Units Using Schur Complement

  • Lubomír ŘíhaEmail author
  • Tomáš Brzobohatý
  • Alexandros Markopoulos
  • Tomáš Kozubek
  • Ondřej Meca
  • Olaf Schenk
  • Wim Vanroose
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9611)

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach developed for acceleration of FETI solvers by Graphic Processing Units (GPU) using the Schur complement (SC) technique. By using the SCs FETI solvers can avoid working with sparse Cholesky decomposition of the stiffness matrices. Instead a dense structure in form of SC is computed and used by conjugate gradient (CG) solver. In every iteration of CG solver a forward and backward substitution which are sequential are replaced by highly parallel General Matrix Vector Multiplication (GEMV) routine. This results in 4.1 times speedup when the Tesla K20X GPU accelerator is used and its performance is compared to a single 16-core AMD Opteron 6274 (Interlagos) CPU.

The main bottleneck of this method is computation of the Schur complements of the stiffness matrices. This bottleneck is significantly reduced by using new PARDISO-SC sparse direct solver. This paper also presents the performance evaluation of SC computations for three-dimensional elasticity stiffness matrices.

We present the performance evaluation of the proposed approach using our implementation in the ESPRESO solver package.

Keywords

FETI solver GPGPU CUDA Schur complement ESPRESO 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports from the National Programme of Sustainability (NPU II) project IT4Innovations excellence in science - LQ1602 and from the Large Infrastructures for Research, Experimental Development and Innovations project IT4Innovations National Supercomputing Center LM2015070; and by the EXA2CT project funded from the EUs Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement No. 610741.

References

  1. 1.
    Farhat, C., Roux, F.-X.: An unconventional domain decomposition method for an efficient parallel solution of large-scale finite element systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 13, 379–396 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dostál, Z., Horák, D., Kučera, R.: Total FETI - an easier implementable variant of the FETI method for numerical solution of elliptic PDE. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 22(12), 1155–1162 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brzobohatý, T., Dostál, Z., Kozubek, T., Kovář, P., Markopoulos, A.: Cholesky decomposition with fixing nodes to stable computation of a generalized inverse of the stiffness matrix of a floating structure. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 88(5), 493–509 (2011). doi: 10.1002/nme.3187 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dostál, Z., Kozubek, T., Markopoulos, A., Menšík, M.: Cholesky decomposition of a positive semidefinite matrix with known kernel. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(13), 6067–6077 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2010.12.069 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kučera, R., Kozubek, T., Markopoulos, A.: On large-scale generalized inverses in solving two-by-two block linear systems. Linear Algebra Appl. 438(7), 3011–3029 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farhat, C., Mandel, J., Roux, F.-X.: Optimal convergence properties of the FETI domain decomposition method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 115, 365–385 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roux, F.-X., Farhat, C.: Parallel implementation of direct solution strategies for the coarse grid solvers in 2-level FETI method. Contemp. Math. 218, 158–173 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kozubek, T., Vondrák, V., Menšík, M., Horák, D., Dostál, Z., Hapla, V., Kabelikova, P., Cermak, M.: Total FETI domain decomposition method and its massively parallel implementation. Adv. Eng. Softw. 60, 14–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuzmin, A., Luisier, M., Schenk, O.: Fast methods for computing selected elements of the green’s function in massively parallel nanoelectronic device simulations. In: Wolf, F., Mohr, B., an Mey, D. (eds.) Euro-Par 2013. LNCS, vol. 8097, pp. 533–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schenk, O., Bollhöfer, M., Römer, R.: On large-scale diagonalization techniques for the Anderson model of localization. Featured SIGEST paper in the SIAM Review selected “on the basis of its exceptional interest to the entire SIAM community”. SIAM Rev. 50, 91–112 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schenk, O., Wächter, A., Hagemann, M.: Matching-based preprocessing algorithms to the solution of saddle-point problems in large-scale nonconvex interior-point optimization. J. Comput. Optim. Appl. 36(2–3), 321–341 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s10589-006-9003-y MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petra, C., Schenk, O., Lubin, M., Gänter, K.: An augmented incomplete factorization approach for computing the Schur complement in stochastic optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36(2), C139–C162 (2014). doi: 10.1137/130908737 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hogg, J.D., Scott, J.A.: A note on the solve phase of a multicore solver, SFTC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Technical report, Science and Technology Facilities Council, June 2010Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Říha, L., Brzobohatý, T., Markopoulos, A.: Highly scalable FETI methods in ESPRESO. In: Ivnyi, P., Toppin, B.H.V. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, Grid, Cloud Computing for Engineering, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 17 (2015). doi: 10.4203/ccp.107.17

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lubomír Říha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tomáš Brzobohatý
    • 1
  • Alexandros Markopoulos
    • 1
  • Tomáš Kozubek
    • 1
  • Ondřej Meca
    • 1
  • Olaf Schenk
    • 2
  • Wim Vanroose
    • 3
  1. 1.IT4Innovations National Supercomputing CentreOstravaCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Computational ScienceUniversita della Svizzera italinaLuganoSwitzerland
  3. 3.University of AntwerpDepartment of Mathematics and Computer ScienceAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations