Advertisement

Pitfalls and Potentials of Home Energy Monitoring Feedback: An Information Experience Critique

  • Marlen Promann
  • Zhenyu Cheryl QianEmail author
  • Yingjie Victor Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9747)

Abstract

Our ageing energy grid, the fundamental resource for human activity, remains one of the great societal challenges. Governments and the energy industry are visioning a future of an engaged society that sustainably produces and consumes energy via a shared multi-directional Smart Grid. This vision; however, depends on our current efforts to increase public’s awareness and comprehension of energy as a limited consumer product, involving personal choice. Energy monitoring and feedback, along with home automation, are fast emerging markets to support this vision. We reviewed 75 currently available home energy-monitoring systems (HEMS) and discussed their pitfalls and potentials. We hope to encourage discussions about the role user experience design could play in personal information visualization, and in addressing fundamental societal problems. We call for experience centric explorations into HEMS’ design to address the energy feedback needs of the future.

Keywords

Home energy monitoring Eco-feedback Information displays User interface Information visualization User experience 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper was inspired by and reports on some of the findings of a home energy monitoring benchmarking research project sponsored by the Whirlpool Corporation.

References

  1. 1.
    Armaroli, N., Balzani, V.: The future of energy supply: challenges and opportunities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46(1–2), 52–66 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Department of Energy: The Smart Grid: An Introduction, U.S. Department of Energy. Industry Report AC26-04NT41817, Subtask 560.01.04 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayulken, B., Huisingh, D.: Perceived ‘Quality of Life’ in eco-developments and in conventional residential settings: an explorative study. J. Cleaner Prod. 98, 253–262 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Technavio market research: Global Home Energy Management Systems Market 2015–2019, Technavio Market Research Company, Toronto, ON. Industry Report IRTNTR6913, August 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ReportLinker: Advanced Metering Infrastructure Market by Devices, Solutions, Services, by Regions - Forecast 2020, ReportLinker, Lyon, France, December 2015Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    MIT Energy Initiative: The Future of the Electric Grid, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. December 2011. ISBN 978-0-9828008-6-7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reports on Demand Response and Advanced Metering, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Washington D.C., Assessment 1–30, December 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacDonald, E.F., She, J.: Seven cognitive concepts for successful eco-design. J. Cleaner Prod. 92, 23–36 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Houwelingen, J.H., van Raaij, W.F.: The effect of goal-setting and daily electronic feedback on in-home energy use. J. Consum. Res. 16(1), 98–105 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, R., Newman, M.W., Forlizzi, J.: Making sustainability sustainable: challenges in the design of eco-interaction technologies. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 823–832 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burgess, J., Nye, M.: Re-materialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems. Energy Policy 36(12), 4454–4459 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., Burgess, J.: Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38(10), 6111–6119 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LaMarche, J., Cheney, K., Akers, C., Roth, K., Sachs, O.: Home Energy Displays: Consumer Adoption and Response, U.S. Department of Energy, Building America Program, Cambridge, MA, DOE/GO-102012-3805, December 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riche, Y., Dodge, J., Metoyer, R.A.: Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1995–1998 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    LaMarche, J., Cheney, K., Christian, S., Roth, K.: Home Energy Management Products and Trends, Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy Systems, Cambridge, MA. Industry Report 55819 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karlin, B., Ford, R., Squiers, C.: Energy feedback technology: a review and taxonomy of products and platforms. Energy Effi. 7(3), 377–399 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 152–158 (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwartz, T., Stevens, G., Jakobi, T., Denef, S., Ramirez, L., Wulf, V., Randall, D.: What people do with consumption feedback: a long-term living lab study of a home energy management system. Interact. Comput. (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kempton, W., Layne, L.L.: The consumer’s energy analysis environment. Energy Policy 22(10), 857–866 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steven Castle: Beyond Energy Monitors, GreenTech Advocates, 14 July 2010. http://greentechadvocates.com/2010/07/14/beyond-energy-monitors/. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
  21. 21.
    Backlund, S., Gyllenswärd, M., Gustafsson, A., Ilstedt Hjelm, S., Mazé, R., Redström, J.: STATIC! the aesthetics of energy in everyday things. In: Proceedings of Design Research Society Wonderground International Conference 2006, Lisbon, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Artefact: Serenity: A Home OS with a Heart, Artefact Blog (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holstius, D., Kembel, J., Hurst, A., Wan, P.-H., Forlizzi, J.: Infotropism: living and robotic plants as interactive displays. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, New York, NY, USA, pp. 215–221 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holmes, T.G.: Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, New York, NY, USA, pp. 153–162 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlen Promann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhenyu Cheryl Qian
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yingjie Victor Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.Interaction DesignPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Computer Graphics TechnologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations