Advertisement

Disruptive UX for Sustainability

Radically Resolving User Needs Is Good for Business and Environment
  • Tao HuangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9747)

Abstract

The paper provides a brief discussion of the basic concepts of sustainability, disruptive innovation, systems thinking theory, and design for behavior change literature. It analyzes several business and design cases closely related to UX and HCI that demonstrated various degrees of success in changing user behaviors to improve the quality of our environment and strengthen communities in the following aspects: reducing pollution from fossil fuel based transportation; reducing waste; providing meaningful and gainful employment; and raising awareness, etc. The paper argues that UX/HCI, being the bridge between hardware and software, is fundamental in ensuring the success of any sustainability initiatives. The paper contemplates the cultural shift of material to immaterial by sharing economy in the internet age, which is one of the promising ways to help our society move towards sustainability. The paper also identifies certain challenges and room for improvement in user experience research and design for sustainability. In the end, this paper suggests four directions for radically rethinking user experience and human/computer interaction design for sustainability.

Keywords

User experience design Systems thinking Sustainability Disruptive innovation Sustainable design Design for behavior change 

References

  1. 1.
    Dreyfuss, H.: Designing for People, p. 240. Simon and Schuster, New York (1955)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Association, I.E.: What is Ergonomics? 2013. http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
  3. 3.
    Group, T.B.C.: Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York (1987). xv, 383 pGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papanek, V.J.: Design for the Real World; Human Ecology and Social Change, 1st American edn., Pantheon Books, New York (1972). xxviii, 339 pGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papanek, V.J.: The Green Imperative: Natural Design for the Real World, p. 256. Thames and Hudson, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Autodesk: The Design-Led Revolution (2016). www.autodesk.com/sustainable-design/revolution. Acessed 27 Feb 2016
  8. 8.
    Blevis, E.: Sustainable interaction design: invention and disposal, renewal and reuse. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bonanni, L., et al.: Visible - actionable - sustainable: sustainable interaction design in professional domains. In: CHI 2011 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odom, W., et al.: Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gore, A., Blood, D.: A Manifesto for Sustainable Capitalism: How Businesses Can Embrace Environmental, Social and Governance Metrics, 15 February 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porritt, J.: Capitalism as if the World Matters, Rev. pbk edn., Earthscan, London, Sterling (2007). xxiv, 360 pGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bower, J.L., Christensen, C.M.: Disruptive technology: catching the wave. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(1), 43–53 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hart, S.L.: Innovation, creative destruction and sustainability. Res.-Technol. Manag. 48(5), 21–27 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, J., Vrendenburg, H.: The challenges for innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 45(1), 60–68 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Botsman, R., Rogers, R.: What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption, 1st edn, Harper Business, New York (2010). xxii, 279Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matin, C.: The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol. Econ. 121, 149–159 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Divvy: Divvy_Trips_2013 (2014). https://www.divvybikes.com/data
  19. 19.
    Divvy: Divvy_Trips_2014-Q4 (2015). https://www.divvybikes.com/data
  20. 20.
    Divvy: Divvy_Trips_2014-Q3-0809, Divvy_Trips_2014-Q3-07, Divvy_Trips_2014_Q1Q2 (2014). https://www.divvybikes.com/data
  21. 21.
    Divvy: Divvy_Trips_2015-Q1, Divvy_Trips_2015-Q2, Divvy_Trips_2015-Q3Q4 (2015). https://www.divvybikes.com/data
  22. 22.
    Weaving designs in time and space to create a sustainable service society. Ezio Manzini. Future News (2004). www.changedesign.org/Students/Changes/Enabling/Enabling%20Docs/ffmanzini.pdf
  23. 23.
    Manzini, E., et al.: Product-service systems and sustainability: opportunities for sustainable solutions. UNEP, Paris, p. 31 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang, T.: Reforming Industrial Design Education in Mainland China: For Sustainability, p. 252. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sterman, J.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000). xxvi, 982 pGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meadows, D.H., Wright, D.: Thinking in Systems: A Primer, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction (2008). xiii, 218 pGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robinson, K.: Do schools kill creativity? TED (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krug, S.: Don’t Make Me Think, Revisited: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability, Rev. edn., New Riders, Berkeley (2014). xi, 200Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krug, S.: Rocket surgery made easy the do-it-yourself guide to finding and fixing usability problems. In: Voices That Matter, p. 1. New Riders, Berkeley (2010). Online resource, v, 161 pGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anderson, S.P.: Seductive Interaction Design: Creating Playful, Fun, and Effective User Experiences. New Riders, Berkeley (2011). Pearson Education distributor, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bell, G., Dourish, P.: Yeseterday’s tomorrow: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 11(2), 133–143 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Duhigg, C.: The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business, 1st edn, Random House, New York (2012). xx, 371Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wendel, S.: Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics, 1st edn, O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2013). xxxvi, 355Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arnall, T.: Exploring ‘immaterials’: mediating design’s invisible materials. Int. J. Des. 8(2), 101–117 (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pernice, K.: Emotional Design Fail: I’m Divorcing My Nest Thermostat (2015). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/emotional-design-fail/. Accessed 28 Dec 2015
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    Makelburge, N.: Computing against the grain. Des. Philos. Pap. 1(4), 175–181 (2003)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wakefield, M.A., Loken, B., Hornik, R.C.: Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. The Lancet 376, 1261–1271 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leuschner, P., Strother, N., Callaway, L.: Navigant Research Leaderboard Report: Home Energy Management Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 16 HEM Vendors 2015. Navigant Consulting, Inc. Boulder, CO (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations