Advertisement

Chances for Urban Electromobility

Field Test of Intermodal Travel System and Effect on Usage Intention
  • Simon HimmelEmail author
  • Barbara S. Zaunbrecher
  • Martina Ziefle
  • Markus C. Beutel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9747)

Abstract

With growing cities, challenges of climate change, and ambitions for energy transition, innovations in urban mobility are inevitable. On the one hand, fossil-fueled vehicles are polluting the cities and could be substituted with electric cars. On the other hand, the sheer number of vehicles has to decrease and public transport needs to be enhanced. A possible solution addressing all challenges in one fully integrated concept is “Mobility Broker”, which combines electric car and bike sharing with public transport in one intermodal traveling system. However, adoption and changes in mobility behavior are crucial for implementing new concepts. In this research, a prototype evaluation by 10 participants using the system for 2 months is presented. The usability of the system as well as the change in attitudes and usage intention before and after the hands-on experience is analyzed. The overall evaluation for intermodal traveling was positive but usability and a reliable infrastructure are crucial factors for usage adoption.

Keywords

Car-sharing Bike sharing Usability Field test Future mobility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks for research support and help with data collection to Anaïs Haberman and thanks to Sean Lidynia for valuable remarks and support. This work was partially funded by German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs Energy for the project Mobility Broker (01ME12136) as well as the Excellence Initiative of the German State and Federal Government (Project Urban Future Outline).

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations: World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. UN Proc. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lerner, W., Van Audenhove, F.-J.: The future of urban mobility: towards networked, multimodal cities in 2050. Public Transp. Int.-Engl. Ed. 61, 14 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benevolo, C., Dameri, R.P., D’Auria, B.: Smart mobility in smart city. In: Torre, T., Braccini, A.M., Spinelli, R. (eds.) Empowering Organizations, pp. 13–28. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, B., McQueen, R., Schuman, K.: Advanced Traveler Information Systems. Artech House Inc., Norwood (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beul-Leusmann, S., Jakobs, E.-M., Ziefle, M.: User-centered design of passenger information systems. In: Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2013 IEEE International, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beutel, M.C., Zaunbrecher, B.S., Himmel, S., Krempels, K.-H., Ziefle, M.: Evaluating an integrated offering for intermodal traveling. In: Conference Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, Rome, Italy (2016, in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beutel, M.C., Gökay, S., Kluth, W., Krempels, K.-H., Samsel, C., Terwelp, C.: Heterogeneous travel information exchange. In: 2nd EAI International Conference on Mobility in IoT, Rome, Italy (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kluth, W., Beutel, M.C., Gökay, S., Krempels, K.-H., Samsel, C., Terwelp, C.: IXSI - interface for X-sharing information. In: 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beutel, M.C., Gokay, S., Kluth, W., Krempels, K.-H., Samsel, C., Terwelp, C.: Product oriented integration of heterogeneous mobility services. In: 2014 IEEE 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1529–1534. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samsel, C., Beul-Leusmann, S., Wiederhold, M., Krempels, K.-H., Ziefle, M., Jakobs, E.-M.: Cascading information for public transport assistance. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2014), pp. 411–422 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wells, S., Forbes, P., Masthoff, J., Gabrielli, S., Jyllha, A.: SUPERHUB: integrating digital behaviour management into a novel sustainable urban mobility system. In: Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, p. 62. British Computer Society (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urban ITS Expert Group, European Commission: Best Practices in Urban ITS – Collection of Projects (2013). http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its/road/action_plan/doc/2013-urban-its-expert_group-best-practice-collection.pdf
  13. 13.
    Huwer, U.: Public transport and car-sharing – benefits and effects of combined services. Transp. Policy 11, 77–87 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffmann, C., Graff, A., Kramer, S., Kuttler, T., Hendzlik, M., Scherf, C., Wolter, F.: Evaluation of integrated Mobility Services with electric vehicles from users’ perspectives (orig. Bewertung integrierter Mobilitätsdienste mit Elektrofahrzeugen aus Nutzerperspektive). Ergeb. Begleit. Im Proj. BeMobility-Berl. ElektroMobil InnoZ-Baustein. 11 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–337 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mügge, H., Lüke, K.-H., Eisemann, M.: Potentials and requirements of mobile ubiquitous computing for public transport. GI Jahrestag 2(110), 237–246 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolf, A., Seebauer, S.: Technology adoption of electric bicycles: a survey among early adopters. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 69, 196–211 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Himmel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbara S. Zaunbrecher
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  • Markus C. Beutel
    • 2
  1. 1.HCIC, Communication ScienceRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Information SystemsRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations