Advertisement

TIIARA: A Language Tool for Bridging the Language Gap

  • Nouf Khashman
  • Elaine MénardEmail author
  • Jonathan Dorey
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9747)

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses the results of the second phase of the development of TIIARA (Taxonomy for Image Indexing and RetrievAl), a bilingual taxonomy dedicated to image indexing and retrieval. TIIARA offers indexers and image searchers innovative and coherent access points for ordinary images. Initially developed in French and English, the taxonomy has been subsequently translated in 8 languages. The preliminary steps of the elaboration of the bilingual structure are briefly described. The process used in the translation of TIIARA in Arabic language is presented, as well as the main difficulties encountered by the translator. Adding more languages in TIIARA constitutes an added value for a controlled vocabulary meant to be used by image searchers who are often limited by their lack of knowledge of multiple languages.

Keywords

Taxonomy Controlled vocabulary Multilingual information Translation Arab language 

References

  1. 1.
    Panofski, E.: Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. Doubleday, Garden City (1955)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krause, M.G.: Intellectual problems of indexing picture collections. Audiov. Librarian 14, 73–81 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Markey, K.: Access to iconographical research collections. Libr. Trends 37, 154–174 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armitage, L.H., Enser, P.G.B.: Analysis of user need in image archives. J. Inf. Sci. 23, 287–299 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jörgensen, C.: Attributes of images in describing tasks. Inf. Process. Manag. 34, 161–174 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jörgensen, C.: Image Retrieval – Theory and Research. Scarecrow, Lanham (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Markkula, M., Sormunen, E.: End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. Inf. Retrieval 1, 259–285 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodrum, A.A., Spink, A.: Image searching on the excite web search engine. Inf. Process. Manag. 37, 295–311 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi, Y., Rasmussen, E.M.: Searching for images: the analysis of users’ queries image retrieval in American history. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54, 498–511 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matusiak, K.K.: Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections. OCLC Syst. Serv. 22, 283–298 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enser, P.G.B., Sandom, C.J., Hare, J.S., Lewis, P.H.: Facing the reality of semantic image retrieval. J. Documentation 63, 465–481 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enser, P.G.B.: The evolution of visual information retrieval. J. Inf. Sci. 34, 531–546 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greisdorf, H.F., O’Connor, B.C.: Structures of Images Collections: from Chauvet-Pont d’Arc to Flickr. Unlimited Libraries, Westport (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ménard, E.: Image retrieval: a comparative study on the influence of indexing vocabularies. Knowl. Organ. 36, 200–213 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chung, E.K., Yoon, J.W.: Categorical and specificity differences between user-supplied tags and search query terms for images. An analysis of Flickr tags and Web image search queries. Inf. Res. 14 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stvilia, B., Jörgensen, C.: User-generated collection-level metadata in an online photo-sharing system. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 31, 54–65 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Markey, K., Atherton, P., Newton, C.: An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches. Online Rev. 4, 225–236 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval: a case study in soil mechanics. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49, 881–887 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Savoy, J.: Bibliographic database access using free-text and controlled vocabulary: an evaluation. Inf. Process. Manag. 41, 873–890 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arsenault, C.: L’utilisation des langages documentaires pour la recherche d’information. Documentation et Bibliothèques. 52, 139–148 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macgregor, G., McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Libr. Rev. 55, 291–300 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rafferty, P., Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic indexing: dialogic approaches to indexing. Aslib Proc. 59, 397–410 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambe, P.: Organising Knowledge: Taxonomies, Knowledge and Organisational Effectiveness. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whittaker, M., Breininger, K.: Taxonomy development for knowledge management. In: World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General Conference and Council, Québec, 10–14 August 2008Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hedden, H.: The Accidental Taxonomist. Information Today, Medford (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ménard, E., Smithglass, M.: Digital image description: a review of best practices in cultural institutions. Libr. Hi Tech. 30, 291–309 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    UNESCO: UNESCO Thesaurus (2016). http://databases.unesco.org/thesaurus/
  28. 28.
    Gilchrist, A., Kibby, P.: Taxonomies for Business: Access and Connectivity in a Wired World. TFPL Consultancy, London (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kremer, S., Kolbe, L.M., Brenner, W.: Towards a procedure model in terminology management. J. Documentation 61, 281–295 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uddin, M.N., Janecek, P.: Performance and usability testing of multidimensional taxonomy in web site search and navigation. Perform. Meas. Metrics 8, 18–33 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ménard, E., Smithglass, M.: Image retrieval in a bilingual context: a review of best practices. Libr. Hi Tech. 32, 98–119 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Walter, H.: Honni soit qui mal y pense. Robert Laffont, Paris (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ethonlogue Languages of the World: Explore the Languages of the World (2015). https://www.ethnologue.com/
  34. 34.
    Internet World Stats (2016). http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats19.htm
  35. 35.
    British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC): A guide to Arabic – 10 facts about the Arabic language (2014). http://www.bbc.co.uk/languages/other/arabic/guide/facts.shtml
  36. 36.
    Moukdad, H., Large, A.: Information retrieval from full-text Arabic databases: can search engines designed for English do the job? LIBRI 51, 63–74 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Habash, N.Y.: Introduction to Arabic Natural Language Processing. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Azmi, A.M., Aljafari, E.A.: Modern information retrieval in Arabic - catering to standard and colloquial Arabic users. J. Inf. Sci. 41, 506–517 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions - IFLA. Guidelines for Multilingual Thesauri (2009). http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/publications/professional-report/115.pdf
  40. 40.
    Braschler, M.: Combination approaches for multilingual text retrieval. Inf. Retrieval 7, 183–204 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ménard, E., Khashman, N., Dorey, J.: Two solitudes revisited: a cross-cultural exploration of online image searcher’s behaviors. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 79–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Qatar National LibraryQatar FoundationDohaQatar
  2. 2.School of Information StudiesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.School Information StudiesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations