Questing Ruins: A Game for a Digital Inclusion

  • Regina HeidrichEmail author
  • Francisco Rebelo
  • Marsal Branco
  • João Batista Mossmann
  • Anderson Schuh
  • Emely Jensen
  • Tiago Oliveira
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9747)


The inclusion of people with cerebral palsy is not an easy path, because many of them preserve their cognitive abilities, despite being unable to speak, walk, or even both. This paper presents a study on the games applied in the education of people with cerebral palsy using Brain Computer Interface (BCI). Children affected by Cerebral Palsies have a disturbance in the control of their postures and body movements as a result of a brain injury. These injuries are the result of several causes. The most frequent is linked to the lack of oxygen flow to the brain, occurring either during or immediately after birth. The objective of the current research is to study the evaluation of the game we developed, called Questing Ruins. The methodology used was that of qualitative approach and case study. At the end we present Questing Ruins, an adventure game for entertainment and environmental awareness.


Brain computer interface Digital inclusion Motor impairments 


  1. 1.
    Medina, B., Vianna, Y., Vianna, M., Tanaka, S., Gamification Inc.: como reinventar empresas a partir de jogos, 1st edn. MJV Press, Rio de Janeiro (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Granic, I., Lobel, A., Engels, R.C.M.E.: The benefits of playing video games. Am. Psychol. 69(1), 66–78 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piaget, J.: Play, Dreams and Imitation. Norton, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erikson, E.H.: Toys and Reasons: Stages in the Ritualisation of Experience. Norton, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Functions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gottman, J.M., Mettetal, G.: Speculations about social and affective development: friendship and acquaintanceship through adolescence. In: Gottman, J.M., Mettetal, G. (eds.) Conversations of Friends: Speculations on Affective Development, pp. 192–237. Cambridge University Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, S.: Surpreendente: a Televisão e o Videogame nos Tornam Mais Inteligentes. Campus, São Paulo (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dewey, J.: Experience and Education. Free Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graimann, B., Allison, B., Pfurtscheller, G.: Brain-computer interfaces: a gentle introduction. In: Graimann, B., Allison, B., Pfurtscheller, G. (eds.) Brain-Computer Interfaces. The Frontiers Collection, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113(6), 767–791 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donoghue, J.P.: Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1085–1088 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levine, S.P., Huggins, J.E., BeMent, S.L., Kushwaha, R.K., Schuh, L.A., Passaro, E.A., Ross, D.A.: Identification of electrocorticogram patterns as the basis for a direct brain interface. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16(5), 439–447 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dunwell, I.: Assessing NeuroSky’s usability to detect attention levels in an assessment exercise. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction New Trends, pp. 149–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haapalainen, E., Kim, S., Forlizzi, J., Dey, A.: Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive burden. In: Bardram, J.E., Langheinrich M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Ubicomp 2010, pp. 301–310 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mostow, J., Chang, K.-M., Nelson, J.: Toward exploiting EEG input in a reading tutor. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 230–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, W., Gong, F., He, L., Sarrafzadeh, M.: Wearable Assistive System Design for Fall Prevention (2011).
  17. 17.
    Crowley, K., Sliney, A., Pitt, I., Murphy, D.: Evaluating a brain-computer interface to categorise human emotional response. In: 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference Proceedings on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 276–278. IEEE Computer Society (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolpaw, J.R.: Brain–computer interfaces as new brain output pathways. J. Physiol. 579(3), 613–619 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuh, A.R., Lima, A., Heidrich, R.O., Mossmann, J., Flores, C., Bez, M.R.: Development of a simulator controlled using non-invasive brain-computer interface for training in the use of a wheelchair. Revista Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 11(3), 1–9 (2013).
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Stake, R.E.: The Art of Case Study Research. Sage, London (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina Heidrich
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francisco Rebelo
    • 2
  • Marsal Branco
    • 1
  • João Batista Mossmann
    • 1
  • Anderson Schuh
    • 1
  • Emely Jensen
    • 1
  • Tiago Oliveira
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidade Feevale, Pró-reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-graduaçãoNovo HamburgoBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations