Advertisement

Interaction for Information Discovery Empowering Information Consumers

  • Kurt EnglmeierEmail author
  • Fionn Murtagh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9734)

Abstract

Information Discovery (ID) is predominantly addressed by approaches from Artificial Intelligence (AI). Automatic ID scans large amounts of data and identifies as many potential candidates for discovery as possible. Mass discovery may in fact serve the needs of many information consumers. However, that does not mean that it addresses a broad range of user interests, too. Economies of scale urge the development of automatic tools to address user needs only from a certain critical mass. Hence, many user needs remain unaddressed. This is where HCI comes into play and provides fundamentals for pattern languages that empower information consumers to stage their own information discovery. With this paper we want to draw attention to an approach that is developed around the paradigm of human-centered interaction design. We present an Open Discovery Language that can completely be controlled by information consumers.

Keywords

Information Discovery Information extraction Data science Collaborative work Interaction design Participatory design Pattern languages Human-centred information management 

References

  1. 1.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing for fun: how can we design user interfaces to be more fun? Interactions 11(5), 48–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robertson, T., Simonsen, J.: Challenges and opportunities in contemporary participatory design. Des. Issues 28(3), 3–9 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holst, E., Kirsch, A.: Financial sector: share of women on corporate boards increases slightly but men still call the shots. DIW Econ. Bull. 6, 27–38 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clement, A.: Computing at work: empowering action by “low-level users”. Commun. ACM 37(1), 52–64 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pentland, A.: The data-driven society. Sci. Am. 309(4), 64–69 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Viaene, S.: Data scientists aren’t domain experts. IT Prof. 15(6), 12–17 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norman, D.: Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner, D., Stevens, A. (eds.) Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandt, D.S., Uden, L.: Insight into mental models of novice internet searchers. Commun. ACM 46(7), 133–136 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elbeshausen, S., Womser-Hacker, C., Mandl, T.: Searcher heterogeneity in collaborative information seeking within the context of work tasks. In: Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium, pp. 327–329 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sawyer, P., Rayson, P., Cosh, K.: Shallow knowledge as an aid to deep understanding in early phase requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(11), 969–981 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chin, G., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Participatory analysis: shared development of requirements from scenarios. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, pp. 162–169 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heymann, P., Paepcke, A., Garcia-Molina, H.: Tagging human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 51–60 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cowie, J., Lehnert, W.: Information extraction. Commun. ACM 39(1), 80–91 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCallum, A.: Information extraction: distilling structured data from unstructured text. ACM Queue – Soc. Comput. 3(9), 48–57 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan, J., Kalyanpur, A., Gondek, D.C., Ferrucci, D.A.: Automatic knowledge extraction from documents. IBM J. Res. Dev. 56(3.4), 5:1–5:10 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magaria, T., Hinchey, M.: Simplicity in IT: the power of less. IEEE Comput. 46(11), 23–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schmalkalden University of Applied ScienceSchmalkaldenGermany
  2. 2.University of DerbyDerbyUK

Personalised recommendations