Advertisement

Exploring Downloadable Assistive Technologies Through the Co-fabrication of a 3D Printed Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Dog Wheelchair

  • Rickee CharbonneauEmail author
  • Kate Sellen
  • Angelika Seeschaaf Veres
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9737)

Abstract

This paper explores Downloadable Assistive Technologies (DAT) and the possibilities as well as the limitations of publishing and fabricating DAT through online 3D printing communities. A design probe was used for this research within the context of Thingiverse, in the form of a 3D printed dog wheelchair design probe – the FiGO Dog Wheelchair. FiGO enabled an exploration of co-customization of tools and processes for DAT, issues of design and communication around modification and personalisation, with several other themes emerging from the research. It is concluded that implementing communication guidelines for publishing DAT on Thingiverse by involving both end users as well as health professionals in the research process is vital to the process of co-fabrication and modification in an open design context.

Keywords

3D printing Co design Digital fabrication Assistive technology Open design Thingiverse 

References

  1. 1.
    Celebrating a Maker Milestone: 1 Million Uploads on MakerBot’s Thingiverse, 29 October 2015. http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2015/10/29/celebrating-a-maker-milestone-1-million-uploads-on-makerbots-thingiverse. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  2. 2.
    Assistive Technology Challenge (n.d.). http://www.thingiverse.com/challenges/AssistiveTechChallenge/. Accessed 20 Jan 2016
  3. 3.
    Buehler, E., Branham, S., Ali, A., Chang, J.J., Hofmann, M.K., Hurst, A., Kane, S.K.: Sharing is caring: assistive technology designs on thingiverse. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 525–534. ACM, April 2015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayes, J., Hannold, E.L.M.: The road to empowerment: a historical perspective on the medicalization of disability. J. Health Hum. Serv. Adm. 352–377 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Abel, B., Evers, L., Troxler, P., Klaassen, R.: Open design now: why design cannot remain exclusive (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hurst, A., Tobias, J.: Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In: The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 11–18. ACM, October 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hook, J., Verbaan, S., Durrant, A., Olivier, P., Wright, P.: A study of the challenges related to DIY assistive technology in the context of children with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 597–606. ACM, June 2014Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mattelmäki, T.: Design Probes. Aalto University, Espoo (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Law Library Article (n.d.). http://www.americanpetproducts.org/law/lawlibrary_article.asp?topic=62. Accessed 5 Jan 2016
  10. 10.
    Rear Support Dog Wheelchair | K9 Carts The Pet Mobility Experts (n.d.). http://www.k9carts.com/rear-wheelchair. Accessed 5 Jan 2016
  11. 11.
    Digital Innovation Hubs 3D Design & Printing (n.d.). http://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/using-the-library/computer-services/innovation-spaces/3D-design-print.jsp. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
  12. 12.
    MakerBot Filament (n.d.). http://store.makerbot.com/filament. Accessed 4 Feb 2016
  13. 13.
    A Matter of Scales: How Much Can You Print with a Single 1 kg Spool? 24 February 2012. http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2012/02/24/a-matter-of-scales-how-much-can-you-print-with-a-single-1kg-spool. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
  14. 14.
    Thingiverse Groups (n.d.). https://www.thingiverse.com/groups. Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  15. 15.
    Oehlberg, L., Willett, W., Mackay, W.E.: Patterns of physical design remixing in online maker communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 639–648. ACM, April 2015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bissyandé, T.F., Lo, D., Jiang, L., Reveillere, L., Klein, J., Le Traon, Y.: Got issues? Who cares about it? A large scale investigation of issue trackers from github. In: 2013 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), pp. 188–197. IEEE, November 2013Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moraiti, A., Vanden Abeele, V., Vanroye, E., Geurts, L.: Empowering occupational therapists with a DIY-toolkit for smart soft objects. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 387–394. ACM, January 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rickee Charbonneau
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kate Sellen
    • 1
  • Angelika Seeschaaf Veres
    • 1
  1. 1.Ontario College of Art and Design UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations