Advertisement

Identifying and Addressing Critical Usability Issues to Strengthen Nurses’ Interactions with Health IT

  • Nancy StaggersEmail author
  • Beth Elias
  • Ellen Makar
  • Jane Hunt
  • Gregory L. Alexander
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9737)

Abstract

Technology usability, especially electronic health record (EHR) usability, is a global concern for clinicians. Despite critical user experience (UX) issues, nurses are not vocal about interactions with health IT. The purpose of this project was to identify nurses’ health IT UX issues and propose solutions for them. Using a snowball sampling technique, 25 experts were interviewed using a semi-structured format. Three themes emerged from content analysis (1) The Burdens of Health IT, (2) The Voice of Nursing, and (3) We Need a New Vision. Lack of cognitive support underscores the burden theme. The voice of nursing is missing throughout the systems life cycle, and a need exists for new visions of EHRs and training delivery. Solutions include the need for national leadership, modular redesign of EHRs to support the way nurses think and do work, and a concerted effort to incorporate UX methods into health IT design in the future.

Keywords

User experience Usability Nurses Health information technology Electronic health records 

References

  1. 1.
    AMA.: AMA board chair: HHS should address EHR usability issues immediately. American Medical Association (2014). http://www.ama-assn.org/ams/pub/amawire/2013-may-15/2013-may-15-general_news1.shtml. Accessed 29 Jan 2016
  2. 2.
    TJC: Safe use of health information technology. Safe use of health technology. The Joint Commission, vol. 54, 31 March 2015. www.jointcommission.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2016
  3. 3.
    AACN: Nursing Fact Sheet. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2011). http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-sheets/nursing-fact-sheet. Accessed 29 Jan 2016
  4. 4.
    Drew, B.J., Harris, P., Zegre-Hemsey, J.K., Mammone, T., Schindler, D., Salas-Boni, R., et al.: Insights into the problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive care unit patients. PLoS ONE 9, e110274 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Staggers, N., Iribarren, S., Guo, J.W., Weir, C.: Evaluation of a BCMA’s electronic medication administration record. West J. Nurs. Res. (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elias, B.L., Moss, J.A., Dillavou, M., Shih, A., Azuero, A.: Evaluation of nursing student perspectivesof a simulated smart pump. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 9, e3599–e3606 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demiris, G., Kneale, L.: Informatics systems and tools to facilitate patient-centered care coordination. Yearb. Med. Inform. 10, 15–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacob, E.R., McKenna, L., D’Amore, A.: The changing skill mix in nursing: considerations for and against different levels of nurse. J. Nurs. Manag. 23, 421–426 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patton, M.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown, T.: The Shift: One Nurse, Twelve Hours and Four Patients’ Lives, p. 117. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins, S.A., Mamykina, L., Jordan, D., Stein, D.M., Shine, A., Reyfman, P., et al.: In search of common ground in handoff documentation in an intensive care unit. J. Biomed. Inform. 45, 307–315 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Staggers, N., Clark, L., Blaz, J.W., Kapsandoy, S.: Why patient summaries in electronic health records do not provide the cognitive support necessary for nurses’ handoffs on medical and surgical units: insights from interviews and observations. Health Inform. J. 17, 209–223 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    HIMSS. HIMSS Usability Maturity Model (2015). http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/ContentTabsDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=39016. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  15. 15.
    NIST: Technical Evaluation, Testing and Validation of Electronic Health Records. NISTIR 7804. National Institutes of Standards and Technology, Gaitherburg, MD (2011). http://www.nist.gov/healthcare/usability/. Accessed 29 Jan 2016
  16. 16.
    ONC: SAFER: Safey Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience. Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT; Washington D.C. (2014). https://www.healthit.gov/sites/safer/files/guides/safer_highprioritypractices_sg001_form_0.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2016
  17. 17.
    NQF: Identification and Prioritization of Health IT Patient Safety Measures. National Quality Forum. HHSM-500-2012-000091-Task Order HHSM-500-TO016-Task Order 16. Department of Health and Human Services, Was 17 November 2015. http://www.qualityforum.org/ProjectEventsList.aspx?projectID=77689. Accessed 27 Jan 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Staggers
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Beth Elias
    • 3
  • Ellen Makar
    • 4
  • Jane Hunt
    • 4
  • Gregory L. Alexander
    • 5
  1. 1.Summit Health InformaticsNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  4. 4.Department of Health and Human ServicesWashington, D.C.USA
  5. 5.University of MissouriKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations