Advertisement

Is Universal Accessibility on Track?

  • Julio AbascalEmail author
  • Luis Azevedo
  • Albert Cook
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9737)

Abstract

Even if the evolution of accessibility engineering is generally considered as impressive, one can question whether it is producing the expected result or not. A deeper analysis can discover that theoretical improvements and practical demonstrators coming from research are not producing proportionate enhancements in the lives of users with disabilities. Starting from an analysis of the role of the research, development, and manufacturing, this paper develops a critical review of the current situation regarding the application of science and engineering to the accessibility field, in order to find the cause of possible weak points, failures and misapplications.

Keywords

Universal accessibility management Social impact 

References

  1. 1.
    Cook, A.M., Polgar, J.M.: Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice, 4th edn. Elsevier/Mosby, St. Louis (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanford, J.A.: Universal Design as a Rehabilitation Strategy. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emiliani, P., Stephanidis, C., Vanderheiden, G.: Technology and inclusion - past, present and foreseeable future. Technol. Disabil. 23(3), 101–114 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Telecommunication Union. Percentage of Individuals using the Internet report. Per country report and comparative data over the past 10 years. In: Measuring the Information Society. International Telecommunication Union. Geneva (2011). www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/backgrounders/general/pdf/5.pdf
  5. 5.
    Higginbotham, J., Jacobs, S.: The future of the Android Operating System for augmentative and alternative communication. Perspect. Augmentative Altern. Commun. 20(2), 52–56 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McNaughton, D., Light, J.: The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative Altern. Commun. 29(2), 107–116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dolic, J., Pibernik, J., Bota, J.: Evaluation of mainstream tablet devices for symbol based AAC communication. In: Jezic, G., Kusek, M., Nguyen, N.-T., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7327, pp. 251–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alliano, A., Herriger, K., Koutsoftas, A.D., Bartolotta, T.E.: A review of 21 iPad applications for augmentative and alternative communication purposes. Perspect. Augmentative Altern. Commun. 21(2), 60–71 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hershberger, D.: Mobile technology and AAC Apps from an AAC developer’s perspective. Perspect. Augmentative Altern. Commun. 20(1), 28–33 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Niemeijer, D., Donnellan, A., Robledo, J.: Taking the pulse of augmentative and alternative communication on iOS. Assistiveware, Amsterdam (2012). http://download.assistiveware.com/assistiveware/files/Taking the Pulse of AAC on iOS White Paper.pdf
  11. 11.
    Kostakos, V.: The big hole in HCI research. Interactions 22(2), 48–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaefer, R., Eikerling, H.J.: Increasing the acceptance of ambient intelligence. In: International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies (ICTTA 2004), Damascus (2006) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Björk, E.: Why did it take four times longer to create the Universal Design solution? Technol. Disabil. 21(4), 159–170 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clarkson, J.: Designing a more inclusive world. In: 2007 Inaugural Conference: Universal Design for the 21st Century: Irish & International Perspectives. Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. http://universaldesign.ie/What-is-Universal-Design/Conference-Proceedings/Universal-Design-for-the-21st-Century-Irish-International-Perspectives/Designing-a-more-Inclusive-World
  15. 15.
    Abascal, J., Barbosa, S.D.J., Nicolle, C., Zaphiris, P.: Rethinking universal accessibility: a broader approach considering the digital gap. Univ. Access Inf. Soc., 1–4 (2015). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10209-015-0416-1/fulltext.html
  16. 16.
    Warschauer, M., Ahumada Newhart, V.: Broadening our concepts of universal access. Univ. Access Inf. Soc., 1–6 (2015). http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10209-015-0417-0.pdf
  17. 17.
    Barlott, T., Adams, K., Cook, A.: Increasing participation in the information society by people with disabilities and their families in lower-income countries using mainstream technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc., 1–10 (2015). http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10209-015-0418-z.pdf
  18. 18.
    WHO: Disability, Including Prevention, Management and Rehabilitation. In: 58th World Health Assembly, 97–100. World Health Organization, Geneva (2005). apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA58-REC1/english/A58_2005_REC1-en.pdf
  19. 19.
    Arne, H., Eide, A.H., Øderud, T.: Assistive technology in low-income countries. In: MacLachlan, M., Swartz, L. (eds.) Disability & International Development. Towards Inclusive Global Health, pp. 149–160. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wright, R.: A Short History of Progress. Anansi Press, Toronto (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    International Telecommunication Union: Measuring the information Society, Geneva, Switzerland. International Telecommunication Union (2013). http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/mis2013/MIS2013_without_Annex_4.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Egokituz Laboratory of HCI for Special NeedsUniversity of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko UnibertsitateaDonostiaSpain
  2. 2.AnditecLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations