A Test Procedure for Checking the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9737)

Abstract

The Internet is an indispensable part of our everyday life today. Worldwide the number of Internet users from 1997–2014 has increased from 121 million to 2.9 billion - that represents an increase from 2 percent to 40 percent of the world’s population [1]. Despite this growth there are barriers to Internet use. This is especially true for people with disabilities. To minimize this, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 specifies guidelines on how a web page can be created to optimize accessibility. In this paper a web-based test procedure as prototype is going to be presented. The accompanying prototype supports the test of all success criteria. The paper is based on an empirical study and evaluation of existing automatic test tools, which are used for the test procedure. As a result, the tester obtains a numerical value about the degree of accessibility. That’s a statement of how well the web page meets the success criteria.

Keywords

Accessibility Test procedure Test tool Web page Web content Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 WCAG 2.0 Disabilities Web-based test tool 

References

  1. 1.
    Internet Live Stats. http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/. Accessed 08 Oct 2015
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Accessed 09 Oct 2015
  4. 4.
    Understanding WCAG 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/. Accessed 09 Oct 2015
  5. 5.
    Techniques for WCAG 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/. Accessed 09 Oct 2015
  6. 6.
    W3C Standards. http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-technology-stds. Accessed 09 Oct 2015
  7. 7.
    W3C Standards - How WCAG 2.0 Differs from WCAG 1.0. http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/from10/diff.php. Accessed 11 Oct 2015
  8. 8.
    Einfach für Alle – Vorsprung durch Techniques: die Umsetzung der WCAG 2.0, https://www.einfach-fuer-alle.de/wcag2.0/. Accessed 11 Oct 2015
  9. 9.
    Meurer, A.: Barrierefreiheit im WWW – Ein Mehrwert für alle?- Design und Implementierung einer barrierefreien Website für das Recherchesystem Infoconnex, Universität Koblenz Landau, Fachbereich Informatik, Institut für Computervisualistik, Diplomarbeit (2003). https://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~litdb/dasa/thesis/getthesis/93. Accessed 5 Apr 2007
  10. 10.
    W3C – Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools List. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/. Accessed 11 Oct 2015
  11. 11.
    Malack, K.: Diplomarbeit Konzeption und prototypische Implementation eines webbasierten Tools zur Selbstevaluierung barrierefreier Webseiten nach WCAG 2.0 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W3C Introduction to Web Accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php. Accessed 23 Jan 2015
  13. 13.
    EIII. http://eiii.eu/. Accessed 24 Jan 2015
  14. 14.
    BITV-Test. http://www.bitvtest.eu/bitv_test.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
  15. 15.
    Classifications of Accessibility Evaluation Tools. http://webaim.org/articles/tools/. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
  16. 16.
    Web accessibility evaluation tool (WAVE). http://wave.webaim.org/. Accessed 31 Jan 2016
  17. 17.
    BIK BITV-Test – Beschreibung des Prüfverfahrens. http://www.bitvtest.de/bitvtest/das_testverfahren_im_detail/verfahren.html#c88. Accessed 31 Jan 2016
  18. 18.
    Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG-EM-20140710/. Accessed 24 Jan 2015
  19. 19.
    About W3C. https://www.w3.org/Consortium/. Accessed 30 Jan 2016
  20. 20.
    Web Accessibility Checker. http://achecker.ca/checker/index.php. Accessed 28 Jan 2016
  21. 21.
    AccessKeys Tools. http://www.accesskeys.org/tools/color-contrast.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2016
  22. 22.
    Tanaguru Contrast-Finder. http://contrast-finder.tanaguru.com/. Accessed 31 Jan 2016
  23. 23.
    Web Accessibility Toolbar. https://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat/. Accessed 15 Jan 2016
  24. 24.
    European Internet Inclusion Initiative. http://checkers.eiii.eu/en/pagecheck/
  25. 25.
    Tanaguru. http://www.tanaguru.com/. Accessed 27 Jan 2016
  26. 26.
    Colorblind Web Page Filter. http://colorfilter.wickline.org/. Accessed 31 Jan 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hessian Ministry for Social Affairs and IntegrationWiesbadenGermany
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences BingenBingenGermany
  3. 3.Otto-von-Guericke-University of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations