Advertisement

The Impact of Orientation and Mobility Aids on Wayfinding of Individuals with Blindness: Verbal Description vs. Audio-Tactile Map

  • Eleni Koustriava
  • Konstantinos Papadopoulos
  • Panagiotis Koukourikos
  • Marialena BaroutiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9739)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine if a verbal description of an urban area or an audio-tactile map would support the development of an effective cognitive route that could be used consequently for detecting specific points of interest in the actual area. Twenty adults with blindness (total blindness or only light perception) took part in the research. Two O&M aids were used: verbal descriptions and audio-tactile maps readable with the use of a touchpad device. Participants were asked to use each aid separately to encode the location of 6 points of interest, and next to walk within the area with the scope of detecting these points. The findings proved that an individual with visual impairments can acquire and use an effective cognitive route through the use of an audio-tactile map, while relying on a verbal description entails greater difficulties when he/she comes into the physical environment.

Keywords

Blindness Touchpad Audio-tactile aid Orientation and mobility 

References

  1. 1.
    Kitchin, R.M., Blades, M., Golledge, R.G.: Understanding spatial concepts at the geographic scale without the use of vision. Prog. Hum. Geog. 21(2), 225–242 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papadopoulos, K., Koustriava, E.: The impact of vision in spatial coding. Res. Dev. Disabil. 32(6), 2084–2091 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papadopoulos, K., Koustriava, E., Kartasidou, L.: The impact of residual vision in spatial skills of individuals with visual impairments. J. Spec. Educ. 45(2), 118–127 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papadopoulos, K., Barouti, M., Charitakis, K.: A University indoors audio-tactile mobility aid for individuals with blindness. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8548, pp. 108–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koustriava, E., Papadopoulos, K.: Mental rotation ability of individuals with visual impairments. J. Vis. Impair. Blin. 104(9), 570–574 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koustriava, E., Papadopoulos, K.: Are there relationships among different spatial skills of individuals with blindness? Res. Dev. Disabil. 33(6), 2164–2176 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blades, M.: Wayfinding theory and research: the need for a new approach. In: Mark, D.M., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, pp. 137–165. Springer, Netherlands (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golledge, R.G.: Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaunet, F., Briffault, X.: Exploring the functional specifications of a localized wayfinding verbal aid for blind pedestrians. Simple and structured urban areas. Hum. Comput. Interact. 20, 267–314 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thinus-Blanc, C., Gaunet, F.: Representation of space in blind persons: vision as a spatial sense? Psychol. Bull. 121(1), 20–42 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Warren, D.H.: Blindness and Children: An Individual Differences Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ungar, S., Blades, M., Spencer, C.: The construction of cognitive maps by children with visual impairments. In: Portugali, J. (ed.) The Construction of Cognitive Maps. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papadopoulos, K., Koustriava, E., Kartasidou, L.: Spatial coding of individuals with visual impairment. J. Spec. Educ. 46(3), 180–190 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitchin, R.M.: Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J. Environ. Psychol. 14, 1–19 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobson, R.D., Kitchin, R.M.: Assessing the configurational knowledge of people with visual impairments or blindness. Swansea Geogr. 32, 14–24 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobson, D., Lippa, Y., Golledge, R.G., Kitchin, R., Blades, M.: Rapid development of cognitive maps in people with visual impairments when exploring novel geographic spaces. IAPS Bull. People-Environ. Stud. (Special Issue on Environmental Cognition) 18, 3–6 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steyvers, F.J.J.M., Kooijman, A.C.: Using route and survey information to generate cognitive maps: differences between normally sighted and visually impaired individuals. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 223–235 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morash, V.: Connell Pensky, A.E., Urqueta Alfaro, A., McKerracher, A.: A review of haptic spatial abilities in the blind. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 12, 83–95 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobson, R.D., Kitchin, R.M.: GIS and people with visual impairments or blindness: exploring the potential for education, orientation, and navigation. Trans. GIS 2(4), 315–332 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lahav, O., Mioduser, D.: Construction of cognitive maps of unknown spaces using a multi-sensory virtual environment for people who are blind. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(3), 1139–1155 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papadopoulos, K.: A school program contributes to the environmental knowledge of blind. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 22(3), 101–104 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papadopoulos, K., Karanikolas, N.: Tactile maps provide location based services for individuals with visual impairments. J. Location Based Serv. 3(3), 150–164 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ungar, S., Blades, M., Spencer, C.: The role of tactile maps in mobility training. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 11(2), 59–61 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Espinosa, M.A., Ochaita, E.: Using tactile maps to improve the practical spatial knowledge of adults who are blind. J. Vis. Impair. Blin. 92(5), 338–345 (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brock, A., Truillet, P., Oriola, B., Picard, D., Jouffrais, C.: Design and user satisfaction of interactive maps for visually impaired people. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7383, pp. 544–551. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Golledge, R.G.: Tactual strip maps as navigational aids. J. Vis. Impair. Blin. 85, 296–301 (1991)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bentzen, B.L.: Orientation aids. In: Blash, B.B., Wiener, W.R., Welsh, R.L. (eds.) Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, vol. 1, pp. 284–316. AFB Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maor, D., Currie, J., Drewry, R.: The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special needs: a review of research-based studies. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 26(3), 283–298 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brown, D.J., McHugh, D., Standen, P., Evett, L., Shopland, N., Battersby, S.: Designing location-based learning experiences for people with intellectual disabilities and additional sensory impairments. Comput. Educ. 56, 11–20 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abu Doush, I., Pontelli, E., Simon, D., Son, T.C., Ma, O.: Making Microsoft Excel™: multimodal presentation of charts. In: 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 147–154. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brock, A., Jouffrais, C.: Interactive audio-tactile maps for visually impaired people. Accessibility Comput. 113, 3–12 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holmes, E., Jansson, G.: A touch tablet enhanced with synthetic speech as a display for visually impaired people’s reading of virtual maps (1997). http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/Us_Eu/conf/csun_97/csun97_060.html
  33. 33.
    MICOLE: D6: Report of the Design and Evaluation of Basic Multimodal Navigation Tools (2006). http://micole.cs.uta.fi/deliverables_public/index.html
  34. 34.
    Brock, A., Truillet, P., Oriola, B., Jouffrais, C.: Usage of multimodal maps for blind people: why and how. In: ITS 2010 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 247–248. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kitchin, R.M., Jacobson, R.D.: Techniques to collect and analyze the cognitive map knowledge of persons with visual impairment or blindness: issues of validity. J. Vis. Impair. Blin. 91, 360–376 (1997)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Papadopoulos, K., Barouti, M.: The contribution of audio-tactile maps to spatial knowledge of individuals with visual impairments. In: Kouroupetroglou, G. (ed.) Proceedings of International Conference on Enabling Access for Persons with Visual Impairment - ICEAPVI-2015, pp. 141–146. Greece, Athens (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Landau, S., Russell, M., Erin, J.N.: Using the talking tactile tablet as a testing accommodation. RE: view 38(1), 7–21 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleni Koustriava
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Papadopoulos
    • 1
  • Panagiotis Koukourikos
    • 1
  • Marialena Barouti
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.University of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations