Advertisement

Inspecting the Quality of Educational Video Artefacts Employed in Speech-Language Pathology Telerehabilitation: A Pilot Study

  • Dijana Plantak Vukovac
  • Tihomir Orehovački
  • Tatjana Novosel-Herceg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9739)

Abstract

Information and communication technology, particularly multimedia technology and the Internet, are commonly employed in the assessment, treatment and education of speech-language and communication disorders. Considering that video artefacts supplement or replace the speech therapist and can be used in both synchronous and asynchronous settings, they represent an important part of an online therapy. This paper presents a part of an ongoing research regarding the use of video in speech-language online therapy. The aim of the paper is threefold. First, we describe how video artefacts have been designed in accordance with the principles of multimedia learning and subsequently employed in telerehabilitation of pediatric speech disorder (dyslalia). Second, we introduce a set of quality attributes which significantly affect the success of the implementation of educational video artefacts in speech-language pathology (SLP) online therapies. Finally, we present and discuss the results of a pilot study carried out with an objective to examine the perceived quality of educational video artefacts applied in SLP telerehabilitation.

Keywords

Quality evaluation Educational video artefacts Speech-language pathology telerehabilitation Dyslalia 

References

  1. 1.
    Arguel, A., Jamet, E.: Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2), 354–359 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouki, V., Economou, D., Angelopoulou, A.: Cognitive theory of multimedia learning and learning videos design: the redundancy principle. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bravo, E., Amante-Garcia, B., Simo, P., Enache, M., Fernandez, V.: Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, pp. 638–642 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carey, B., O’Brian, S., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Menzies, R.: Webcam delivery of the camperdown program for adolescents who stutter: a phase I trial. Lang. Speech Hearing Serv. Sch. 43(3), 370–380 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobrian, F., Sekar, V. Awan, A., Stoica, I., Joseph, D., Ganjam, A., Zhan, J., Zhang, H.: Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, pp. 362–373 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gena, C., Weibelzahl, S.: Usability engineering for the adaptive web. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 720–762. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gligora Marković, M., Kliček, B., Plantak Vukovac, D.: The effects of multimedia learning materials quality on knowledge acquisition. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems Development, pp. 140–149. Faculty of Organization and Informatics, Varaždin (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp. 41–50 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hill, A.J., Theodoros, D., Russell, T., Ward, E.: Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 44(5), 731–747 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lou, S., Lin, H., Shih, R.C., Tseng, K.H.: Improving the effectiveness of organic chemistry experiments through multimedia teaching materials for junior high school students. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 11(2), 135–141 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mashima, P.A., Birkmire-Peters, D.P., Syms, M.J., Holtel, M.R., Burgess, L., Peters, L.J.: Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology. Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 12(4), 432–439 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Molini-Avejonas, D.R., Rondon-Melo, S., de La Higuera Amato, C.A., Samelli, A.G.: A systematic review of the use of telehealth in speech, language and hearing sciences. J. Telemed. Telecare 21(7), 367–376 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orehovački, T.: Perceived quality of cloud based applications for collaborative writing. In: Pokorny, J., et al. (eds.) Information Systems Development – Business Systems and Services: Modeling and Development, pp. 575–586. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orehovački, T.: Proposal for a set of quality attributes relevant for Web 2.0 application success. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 319–326. IEEE Press, Cavtat (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orehovački, T., Al Sokkar, A.A., Derboven, J., Khan, A.: Exploring the hedonic quality of slow technology. In: CHI 2013 Workshop on Changing Perspectives of Time in HCI (2013). http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/617623.workshop_paper_final3.pdf
  19. 19.
    Orehovački, T., Babić, S.: Inspecting quality of games designed for learning programming. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9192, pp. 620–631. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Orehovački, T., Babić, S., Jadrić, M.: Exploring the validity of an instrument to measure the perceived quality in use of Web 2.0 applications with educational potential. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8523, pp. 192–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orehovački, T., Granić, A., Kermek, D.: Evaluating the perceived and estimated quality in use of Web 2.0 applications. J. Syst. Softw. 86(12), 3039–3059 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orehovački, T., Granollers, T.: Subjective and objective assessment of mashup tools. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8517, pp. 340–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Orehovački, T., Plantak Vukovac, D., Novosel-Herceg, T.: Educational artefacts as a foundation for development of remote speech-language therapies. In: Vogel, D., et al. (eds.) Transforming Healthcare Through Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orehovački, T., Žajdela Hrustek, N.: Development and validation of an instrument to measure the usability of educational artifacts created with Web 2.0 applications. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8012, pp. 369–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plantak Vukovac, D., Novosel-Herceg, T., Orehovački, T.: Users’ needs in telehealth speech-language pathology services. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems Development, pp. 1–12. Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Theodoros, D.G.: Speech-language pathology and telerehabilitation. In: Kumar, S., Cohn, E.R. (eds.) Telerehabilitation, pp. 311–323. Springer, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Towey, M.: Speech therapy telepractice. In: Kumar, S., Cohn, E.R. (eds.) Telerehabilitation, pp. 101–123. Springer, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ward, E., Crombie, J., Trickey, M., Hill, A., Theodoros, D.G., Russell, T.G.: Assessment of communication and swallowing postlaryngectomy: a remote telerehabilitation trial. J. Telemed. Telecare 15(5), 232–237 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dijana Plantak Vukovac
    • 1
  • Tihomir Orehovački
    • 2
  • Tatjana Novosel-Herceg
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Organization and InformaticsUniversity of ZagrebVaraždinCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Information and Communication TechnologiesJuraj Dobrila University of PulaPulaCroatia
  3. 3.VaLMod Speech-Language Pathology CentreVaraždinCroatia

Personalised recommendations