Advertisement

The Accessibility of MOOC Platforms from Instructors’ Perspective

  • Norun C. SandersonEmail author
  • Weiqin Chen
  • Way Kiat Bong
  • Siri Kessel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9739)

Abstract

MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) provides remarkable learning opportunities for a great diversity of people. MOOCs have been studied from several perspectives, including accessibility. However, little attention has so far been paid to investigating whether MOOC platforms themselves are accessible for instructors who are the authors of MOOCs. To ensure universal and equal access to the MOOC platforms, a systematic study of the accessibility of the MOOC platforms from instructors’ perspective is essential. This paper presents results from a heuristic evaluation of the Canvas platform, focusing on its accessibility to instructors creating course contents in MOOCs. We have based the evaluation on Part A of the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 by W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). The preliminary results show that although Canvas provides much support for instructors to create accessible MOOCs, it does not comply fully with ATAG 2.0.

Keywords

Universal design Accessibility MOOC platforms Canvas Instructors Heuristic evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Mouh, N.A., Al-Khalifa, A.S., Al-Khalifa, H.S.: A first look into MOOCs accessibility. In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs, pp. 145–152. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohnsack, M., Puhl, S.: Accessibility of MOOCs. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8547, pp. 141–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calle-Jimenez, T., Sanchez-Gordon, S., Luján-Mora, S.: Web accessibility evaluation of massive open online courses on Geographical Information Systems. In: Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Draffan, E.A., Wald, M., Dickens, K., et al.: Stepwise approach to accessible MOOC development. In: Assistive Technology, pp. 227–234 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C., Moreira Teixeira, A.: Accessibility analysis in MOOC platforms. A case study: UNED COMA and UAb iMOOC. In: Libro de Actas del V Congreso Internacional sobre Calidad y Accesibilidad de la Formación Virtual CAFVIR (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    NOU 2014:5. MOOCs for Norway: New digital learning methods in higher education. Ministry of Education and Research Norway, Oslo (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reich, J.: Rebooting MOOC research. Science 347(6217), 34–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez-Gordon, S., Lujan-Mora, S.: Web accessibility of MOOCs for elderly students. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET 2013), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanchez-Gordon, S., Lujan-Mora, S.: Adaptive content presentation extension for open edX. Enhancing MOOCs accessibility for users with disabilities. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2015), pp. 181–183 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sarasa-Cabezuelo, A., Sierra-Rodríguez, J.-L.: Development of a MOOC management system. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2014), pp. 155–162. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, W., Sanderson, N.C., Kessel, S., Królak, A.: Heuristic evaluations of the accessibility of learning management systems (LMSs) as authoring tools for teachers. First Monday, [S.l.], September 2015. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5430. ISSN: 13960466
  12. 12.
    Chen, W., Sanderson, N.C., Kessel, S.: The accessibility of learning management systems from teachers’ perspective. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 437–442 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, T.: Coursera Charts Course for International Expansion With $49.5 M in Series C Funding (2015). https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-08-25-coursera-charts-course-for-international-expansion-with-49-5m-in-series-c-funding

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norun C. Sanderson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Weiqin Chen
    • 1
  • Way Kiat Bong
    • 1
  • Siri Kessel
    • 1
  1. 1.Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations