Supporting Collaborative Serious Game Studies Online

  • Francesco BellottiEmail author
  • Riccardo Berta
  • Alessandro De Gloria
  • Michela Ott
  • Maria Magdalena Popescu
  • Jannicke Baalsrud-Hauge
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9599)


While a lot of papers have argued for the educational potential of serious games, the field is still young and methods and tools are needed in order to support effective and efficient design. The SG Studies Database is an instrument devised to allow sharing structured information about SGs. This information can be used by scholars and practitioners also to perform comparative analysis and identify components and modules that could be used in different games. The SG Studies database, which is freely available online on the site of the Serious Games Society, relies on a SG description model, that has been defined in order to allow a structured description of SGs, considering the perspectives of different stakeholders and contexts of use, and spurring the identification of SG components and their relationship with pedagogical theories and expected outcomes. The SG Studies database has already been used as a tool to support identification of reusable patterns and components in SGs, in order to identify best practices and favor module re-use. Other meta studies are possible in the future on the database by any parties.


Educational Game Pedagogical Goal Knowledge Management System Game Type Game Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Sawyer, B., Smith, P.: Serious game taxonomy. Paper presented at the Meeting Serious Game Summit 2008, Game Developer Conference Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zyda, M.: From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38(9), 25–32 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michael, D., Chen, S.: Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train, and Inform. Thomson Course Technology, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S.: Overview of research on the educational use of videogames. Digital Kompetanse 3(1), 184–213 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D.: Talking digital educational games. In: Kickmeier-Rust, M.D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Open Workshop on Intelligent Personalization and Adaptation in Digital Educational Games, Graz, Austria, pp. 55–66 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.P., Methel, G., Molinier, P.: A gameplay definition through videogame classification. Int. J. Comput. Game Technol. (2008). Quarter 1, Hindawi Publishing CorporationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoogeboom, H.J., Kosters, W.A.: The theory of tetris. Nieuwsbrief van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Theoretische Informatica 9, 14–21 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsuruda, K.M.: A closer look at tetris: analysis of a variant game. Atlantic Electron. J. Math. 4(1), 23–34 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pannese, L., Morosini, D.: Serious games to support reflection in the healthcare sector. Int. J. Serious Games 1(3), 5–14 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barbieri, A., Tesei, A., Bruzzone, A., Roceanu, I., Beligan, D.: Learning impact evaluation of the serious game “Cultural Awareness – Afghanistan Pre-deployment”. Int. J. Serious Games 1(3), 15–33 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Islas Sedano, C., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Hu, J., Rauterberg, M.: An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Comput. Educ. 87, 166–181 (2015). ISSN: 0360-1315, Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol. (2014). doi: 10.1111/bjet.12113 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: Games and Learning Alliance (GaLA) supporting education and training through hi-tech gaming. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Rome, Italy, 4–6 July 2012, pp. 740–741 (2012). Art. no. 6268245, doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2012.146
  14. 14.
    Kirriemuir, J., McFarlane, A.: Literature Review in Games and Learning Report 8: Futurelab Series (2004).
  15. 15.
    Riedel, J, Baalsrud Hauge, J.: State of the art of serious gaming for business and industry. In: 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Collaborative Environments for Sustainable Innovation, Aachen, Germany. Centre for Operations Management, RWTH Aachen, Aachen (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herz, J.C.: Joystick Nation. Little Brown & Company, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Peirce, N., Conlan, O., Schwarz, D., Verpoorten, D., Albert, D.: Immersive digital games: the interfaces for next-generation e-learning? In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4556, pp. 647–656. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.P., Rampnoux, O.: Origins of serious games. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Lakhmi, C., Jain, L.K. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 25–43. Springer, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rego, P., Moreira, P.M., Reis, L.P.: Serious games for rehabilitation: a survey and a classification towards a taxonomy. In: 5th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wouters, P., van der Spek, E.D., van Oostendorp, H.: Current practices in serious game research: a review from a learning outcomes perspective. In: Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., Boyle, L. (eds.) Games-Based Learning Advancements for Multi-sensory Human Computer Interfaces: Techniques and Effective Practices, pp. 232–250 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greitzer, F.L., Kuchar, O.A., Huston, K.: Cognitive science implications for enhancing training effectiveness in a serious gaming context. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 7(3), 2–16 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cowley, B., Charles, D., Black, M., Hickey, R.: Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Comput. Entertainment 6(2), 1–27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cziksentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.A.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harrow, A.J.: A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. McKay, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., Masia, B.B.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. In: Handbook II: The Affective Domain. David McKay Company (1964)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (Hrsg.): Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, Mahwah (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shute, V.J., Ke, F.: Games, learning, and assessment. In: Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., Ge, X. (eds.) Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives, pp. 43–58. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2013). Article ID 136864, doi: 10.1155/2013/136864 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maritain, J.: La personne et le bien commun, The Person and the Common Good, by John J. Fitzgerald. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1985)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., Hu, J., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Rauterberg, M.: Towards a service oriented architecture framework for educational serious games. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2015), Hualien, Taiwan, pp. 147–151 (2015). doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2015.145
  32. 32.
    Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Gazzarata, G., Hu, J., Kickmeier-Rust, M.: A case study on service-oriented architecture for serious games. Entertainment Comput. 6, 1–10 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Curatelli, F., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., Martinengo, C.: Paths for cognitive rehabilitation: from reality to educational software, to serious games, to reality again. In: Gloria, A. (ed.) GALA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8605, pp. 172–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12157-4_14 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Curatelli, F., Martinengo, C.: Design criteria for educational tools to overcome mathematics learning difficulties. In: Proceedings of Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications Conference, VS-GAMES 2012, Genova, 29–31 October 2012. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 15C, 2012, pp. 92–102. Elsevier B.V. Publ., The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Bellotti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Riccardo Berta
    • 1
  • Alessandro De Gloria
    • 1
  • Michela Ott
    • 2
  • Maria Magdalena Popescu
    • 3
  • Jannicke Baalsrud-Hauge
    • 4
  1. 1.DITEN - University of GenovaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Institute for Educational Technology - National Council of Research (CNR-ITD)GenoaItaly
  3. 3.Carol I National Defense UniversityBucharestRomania
  4. 4.BIBA, University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations