Advertisement

Conclusions from the Evaluation of Virtual Machine Based High Resolution Display Wall System

  • Rudolfs BundulisEmail author
  • Guntis Arnicans
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 615)

Abstract

There are several approaches to the construction of large scale high resolution display walls depending on the required use case. Some require support of 3D acceleration APIs like OpenGL, some require stereoscopic projection. Others simply require a surface with a very high display resolution. The authors of this paper have developed a virtual machine based high resolution display wall architecture that works for all planar projection use cases and does not require a custom integration. The software that generates the presented content is executed in a virtual machine thus no specific APIs other than those of the virtualized OS are required. Any software that is able to run under a given OS can be run on this display wall architecture without modifications. The authors have performed performance evaluations, virtualization environment comparisons and comparisons among other display wall architectures. All this knowledge along with key conclusions is summarized in this paper.

Keywords

Display wall Remote visualization Video streaming H.264 Virtualization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the Latvian National research program SOPHIS under grant agreement Nr.10–4/VPP-4/11”.

References

  1. 1.
    Papadopoulos, C.: The reality deck–an immersive gigapixel display. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35(1), 33–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bundulis, R., Arnicans, G.: Architectural and technological issues in the field of multiple display technologies. In: Databases and Information Systems VII: Selected Papers from the Tenth International Baltic Conference, DB&IS 2012, pp. 317–329 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Renambot, L., Rao, A., Singh, R., Byungil, J., Krishnaprasad, N., Vishwanath, V., Chandrasekhar, V., Schwarz, N., Spale, A., Zhang, C., Goldman, G., Leigh, J., Johnson, A.: SAGE: the scalable adaptive graphics environment. Proc. WACE 9, 2004–2009 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renambot, L., Marrinan, T., Aurisano, J., Nishimoto, A., Mateevitsi, V., Bharadwaj, K., Long, L., Johnson, A., Brown, M., Leigh, J.: SAGE2: a collaboration portal for scalable resolution displays. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 54(C), 296–305 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, G., Abram, G., Westing, B., Navr’til, P., Gaither, K.: DisplayCluster: an interactive visualization environment for tiled displays. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pp. 239–247 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humphreys, G., Houston, M., Ng, R., Frank, R., Ahern, S., Kirchner, P., Klosowski, J.: Chromium: a stream-processing framework for interactive rendering on clusters. ACM Trans. Graph. 21(3), 693–702 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humphreys, G., Eldridge, M., Buck, I., Stoll, G., Everett, M., Hanrahan, P.: WireGL: a scalable graphics system for clusters. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 129–140 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eilemann, S., Makhinya, M., Pajarola, R.: Equalizer: a scalable parallel rendering framework. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15(3), 436–452 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doerr, K.-U., Kuester, F.: CGLX: a scalable, high-performance visualization framework for networked display environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17(3), 320–332 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang, Y.-B., Chae, K.-J.: XMegaWall: a super high-resolution tiled display using a PC cluster. In: Proceedings of Computer Graphics International, pp. 29–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perrine, K.: Parallel graphics and interactivity with the scalable graphics engine. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, p. 5 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bundulis, R., Arnicans, G.: Concept of virtual machine based high resolution display wall. In: 2014 IEEE 2nd Workshop on Advances in Information, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (AIEEE), pp. 1–6 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bundulis, R., Arnicans, G.: Virtual machine based high resolution display wall: experiments on proof of concept. In: International Conference on Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering (SCSS 14), Electronic CISSE 2014 Conference Proceedings (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bundulis, R., Arnicans, G.: Use of H.264 real-time video encoding to reduce display wall bandwidth consumption. In: 2015 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Advances in Information, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (AIEEE), pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ComputingUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations