Advertisement

HCI Within Cross-Cultural Discourses of Globally Situated Rhetorical and Etymological Interactions

  • Daniel G. CabreroEmail author
  • Arminda Guerra Lopes
  • Barbara Rita Barricelli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9741)

Abstract

About forty years of thriving Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) have expanded into an affluent and apparent diverse and enriching field-for-all. Subsequently this has given way to other fields such as Human-Work Interaction Design (HWID), where a main focus stands on human-centred practices at work regarding productivity and the final fulfilment of humanly aims and goals. This is in stark contrast with other ways of accepting the world, thus of work. HCI for Development (HCI4D) often shows interdependences proposed in the Global North often fail in settings like in the East or also in the Global South. This is while technology permeates at rapid and unstoppable paces everywhere. If HCI4D thus-far shows scant positive results, traditional HWID is seemingly stagnated into modes of production having little to do with promoting actual satisfaction, nor environmental sustainability, to mention a few further options. As younger, novice participants enter academic and practitioner HCI grounds, concepts, definitions and terminology resemble confusion at times, while in occasions these appear to depict archaic modes of distribution, self-empowerment and development as inevitable in today’s technologically connected world. Questioning thus existing globalised status-quos related to concepts, definitions and deployments sparks into proposing fairer, more sustainable and micro-cultural approaches to life via and by HCI. To achieve the above, the disentanglement of established meanings through the dissemination of objects, concepts and HCI definitions and terminologies is proposed by applying a theoretical and a pragmatic analysis. This is done with the aim of shedding clarity via reflection and comprehension into mindfulness of ethical and integral possibilities.

This paper presents, proposes and discusses an approach to concepts and words in everyday life such as work, interaction and development, as seen from a myriad of cultural perspectives, cases and understandings. The ultimate objective is to keep discerning past, present and future meanings in HCI, and the connotations of such commonly used terms and expressions.

Keywords

HCI Rhetoric Etymology HWID HCI4D Cultural Usability UX Participatory Design Personas Micro-Cultures 

References

  1. Abdelnour Nocera, J., Barricelli, B.R., Lopes, A., Campos, P., Clemmensen, T. (eds.): HWID 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 468. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7 Google Scholar
  2. Blake, E., Glaser, M., Freudenthal, A.: Teaching design for development in computer science. Interactions 21(2), 54–59 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bødker, S.: When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings NordiCHI 2006, pp. 14–18. ACM, New York (2006). http://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
  4. Cabrero, D.G., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Mendonca, H.: User-created personas – a micro-cultural lens into informal settlement’s youth life. In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., Barricelli, B.R., et al. (eds.) HWID 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 468, pp. 57–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cockton, G.: A load of Cobbler’s children: beyond the model designing processor. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013, pp. 2139–2148. ACM Press (2013)Google Scholar
  6. Crompton, T.: Common Cause: The Case for Working with our Cultural Values London, WWF-UK, Climate Outreach and Information Network, Campaign to Protect Rural England, Friends of the Earth, Oxfam 100 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. Dourish, P.: HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. In: Proceedings of the DIS 2010, pp. 1–10. ACM Press (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858173
  8. Escobar, A.: Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, G.: From reflective practitioners to reflective communities. In: Proceedings of HCII 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Grudin, J.: The west wing: fiction can serve politics. Scandinavian J. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 73–77 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. Grudin, J.: Three faces of human-computer interaction. In: IEEE Trans., 2–18 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Grudin, J.: A moving target — the evolution of human-computer interaction. In: Jackson, J. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 3rd edn., p. 40. Taylor & Francis (2012)Google Scholar
  13. Harper, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., Sellen, A. (eds.) Being Human: Human-Computer Interaction in the Year 2020 (A3). Microsoft Research Ltd. (2008)Google Scholar
  14. Irani, L., Silberman, M.S.: Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon mechanical turk In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, 28 April – 2 May 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. Keates, S.: Teaching the next generation of universal access designers: a case study. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6765, pp. 70–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Kim, S.: Interdisciplinary cooperation. In: Laurel, B. (ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1990)Google Scholar
  17. Knopf, B.: RealClimate: Mitigation of Climate Change – Part 3 of the new IPCC report, 17 April 2014. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2014/04/mitigation-of-climate-change-part-3-of-the-new-ipcc-report/#more-17217. Accessed 21 April 2014
  18. Kostakos, V.: The big hole in HCI research. Interactions 22(2), 48–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laurel, B.: Gaian IxD. Interactions 18(5), 38–46 (2011). http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uwl.ac.uk/10.1145/2008176.2008187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Light, A., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Cox, G., Fritsch, J., Hansen, L.K.: Making ‘World Machines’: discourse, design and global technologies for greater-than-self issues. In: Proceedinigs of the Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 2015, vol. 1, Aarhus, Denmark (2015). http://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21326
  21. Löfstrom, A.: What is culture? toward common understandings of culture in HCI. In: Forbrig, P., Paternó, F., Mark Pejtersen, A. (eds.) HCIS 2010. IFIP AICT, vol. 332, pp. 133–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15231-3_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muller, M.J., Wharton, C., McIver Jr., W.J., Laux, L.: Toward an HCI research and practice agenda based on human needs and social responsibility. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 155–161 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. Pan, Y., Roedl, D., Blevis, E., Thomas, J.: Re-conceptualizing fashion in sustainable HCI. In: Proceedings Of the DIS 2012, pp. 813–815. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  24. Reeves, S.: Human-computer interaction as science. In: Proceedings of 5th Decennial Aarhus Conference (Critical Alternatives). ACM Press (2015)Google Scholar
  25. Rogers, Y.: HCI theory: classical, modern and contemporary. Synth. Lect. Hum.-Centered Inform. 5(2), 1–129 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanders, E.B.-N.: From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Frascara, J. (ed.) Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, pp. 1–8. Taylor & Francis (2002)Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, L., Stappers, P.J.: Designing to co-designing to collective dreaming: three slices in time. ACM Interactions 21(6), 24–33 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sennett, R.: The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. W.W.Nort. Co., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  29. Williams, R.: Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, 2nd edn. Fontana Paperbacks, London (1983)Google Scholar
  30. Winschiers-Theophilus, H.: The art of cross-cultural design for usability. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5614, pp. 665–671. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  31. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Cabrero, D.G., Angula, S., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Mendonca, H., Ngolo, R.: A challenge-based approach to promote entrepreneurship among youth in an informal settlement of windhoek. In: Proceedings of the SATN 2015, Technology Vaal University Science Park, Sebokeng (2015)Google Scholar
  32. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Keskinen, P., Cabrero, D.G., Angula, S., Ongwere, T., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Mendonca, H., Ngolo, R.: ICTD within the discourse of a locally situated interacion: the potential of youth engagement. In: Steyn, J., Van Belle, J.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th IDIA conference, pp. 52–71, Nungwi (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel G. Cabrero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arminda Guerra Lopes
    • 2
  • Barbara Rita Barricelli
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computing and EngineeringUniversity of West LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Madeira Interactive Technologies InstituteMadeiraPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversità Degli Studi Di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations