Advertisement

A-PiMod: A New Approach to Solving Human Factors Problems with Automation

  • Joan CahillEmail author
  • Tiziana C Callari
  • Florian Fortmann
  • Denis Javaux
  • Andreas Hasselberg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9736)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present a new adaptive automation concept which (1) addresses the still open human factors problems with automation from a team centred perspective and (2), as part of this, offers a new ‘team’ centred approach to solving these problems. In so doing, this paper poses questions about what it means to work in a team, what kind of expertise a third crew member (i.e. automation) offers, and how team members might share information about their state, intentions and actions. In elucidating this new automation concept, this paper introduces new role/work practice concepts for pilots, and a potential roadmap for adaptive automation and single crew operations.

Keywords

Adaptive automation Stakeholder evaluation Crew state monitoring Pilot decision making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results/preliminary outcomes has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement N. 605141 - Applying Pilot Models for Safety Aircraft (A-PiMod) Project. We would like to thank member of the A-PiMod Project Team and our COP members – particularly, Paul Cullen, William Butler, Martin Duffy and Stephen Duffy.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaber, D.B., Prinzel, L.J.: Adaptive and Adaptable Automation Design: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research. NASA/TM-2006-214504 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hilburn, Byrne, Parasuraman: Horwood Limited (publishers), John Wiley & Sons (Halsted Press) (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaber, D.B., Riley, J.M.: Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. Int. J. Cogn. Ergonomics 3, 169–187 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flight AF 447 Final Report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro (Published July 2012). Retrieved from Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile (BEA). 1 June 2009. http://www.bea.aero/docspa/2009/f-cp090601.en/pdf/f-cp090601.en.pdf
  5. 5.
    Flight Spainair 5022 Final Report on the accident on 20th August 2008 involving a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82 (MD-82) registration EC-HFP operated by Spainair at Madrid-Barajas Airport (Published 8 October 2008). Retrieved from Comisión Investigatión de Accidentes e Incidentes de Aviación Civil (CIAIAC). 20 August 2008. http://www.fomento.es/NR/rdonlyres/EC47A855-B098-409E-B4C8-9A6DD0D0969F/107087/2008_032_A_ENG.pdf
  6. 6.
    Flight Helios Airways HCY522 Final Report on the accident on 14th August 2005 involving a Boeing 737-31S registration 5B-DBY operated by Helios Airways at Grammatiko, Hellas (Published November 2006). Retrieved from Air Accident Investigation & Aviation Safety Board (AAIASB), 14 August 2005. http://www.moi.gov.cy/moi/pio/pio.nsf/All/F15FBD7320037284C2257204002B6243/$file/FINAL%20REPORT%205B-DBY.pdf
  7. 7.
    Flight China Airlines 140 Final Report on the accident on 26th April 1994 involving an Airbus Industrie A300B4-662R registration B1816 operated by China Airlines at Nagoya Airport (Published 19 July 1996). Retrieved from Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission. 26 April 1994. http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/808.pdf
  8. 8.
    Flight Air Inter 148 Final Report on the accident on 20th January 1992 involving an Airbus A320 registration F-GGED operated by Air Inter Airlines in Vosges Mountains (near Mont Sainte-Odile). Retrieved from Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile (BEA), 20 January 1992. http://www.bea.aero/docspa/1992/f-ed920120/htm/f-ed920120.html
  9. 9.
    Cahill, J., Callari, T.C.: A Novel Human Machine Interaction (HMI) Design/Evaluation Approach Supporting the Advancement of Improved Automation Concepts to Enhance Flight Safety. In: de Waard, D., Sauer, J., Röttger, S., Kluge, A., Manzey, D., Weikert, C., Toffetti, A., Wiczorek, R., Brookhuis, K., H., Hoonhout (eds.). Proceeding of the Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2014 Annual Conference Human Factors in high reliability industries Lisbon, Portugal. http://www.hfes-europe.org/human-factors-high-reliability-industries-2/
  10. 10.
    Wenger, E., McDermott, R.A., Snyder, W.: Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cousins, J.B., Whitmore, E., Shulha, L.: Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. Am. J. Eval. 34(1), 7–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Javaux, D., Fortmann, F., Möhlenbrink, C.: Adaptive human-automation cooperation: a general architecture for the cockpit and its application in the A-PiMod project. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Cognitive Technologies and Applications (COGNITIVE 2015). International Academy, Research, and Industry Association (IARIA). ISBN: 978-1-61208-390-2 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Cahill
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tiziana C Callari
    • 1
  • Florian Fortmann
    • 2
  • Denis Javaux
    • 3
  • Andreas Hasselberg
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Psychology, Centre for Innovative Human Systems (CIHS)Trinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.R&D Division TransportationOFFIS – Institute for Information TechnologyOldenburgGermany
  3. 3.Symbio Concepts & Products S.P.R.LBassengeBelgium
  4. 4.Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für FlugführungBrunswickGermany

Personalised recommendations