Advertisement

Influence of Time Delay on Team Performance in Space Robotic Teleoperation

  • Mengdi LiuEmail author
  • Yijing Zhang
  • Cheng Zhu
  • Zhizhong Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9736)

Abstract

Team teleoperation, which is commonly seen in dangerous and inaccessible environments, is challenging by the complexity and dynamics of the environment, especially when there is time delay. This study was focused on Two-Operator-Two-Robot teleoperation and discussed the influence of time delay on team performance. In this study, we collected operational performance data, eye movement data and subjective rating to compare the performance of an object moving task with 0 s and 3.73 s time delay. Preliminary results of the experiment indicate that the increase of time delay significantly increase completion time and decrease fraction of time moving (MRATIO). In addition, time delay significantly increase the variance of the number of collisions and joint limit reach, which suggest that the inter-individual difference become greater under time delay.

Keywords

Team performance Time delay Teleoperation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71371174, 61273322).

References

  1. 1.
    Adelstein, B.D., Lee, T.G., Ellis, S.R.: Head tracking latency in virtual environments: psychophysics and a model. In: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson, D.A.: The development of a six degree-of-constraint robot performance evaluation test. In: 13th Annual Conference on Manual Control (MIT Proc), pp. 289–292 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hill, J.W.: Comparison of seven performance measures in a time delayed manipulation task. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. smc-6(4), 286–295 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheridan, T.B., Ferrellt, W.R.: Remote manipulative control with transmission delay (1963)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chong, N.Y., Kawabata, S.I., Ohba, K., Kotoku, T., Komoriya, K., Takase, K., Tanie, K.: Multioperator teleoperation of multirobot systems with time delay: part I—aids for collision- free control. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11(3), 277–291 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chong, N.Y., et al.: Remote coordinated controls in multiple telerobot cooperation (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chongl, N.Y., et al.: Development of a multi-telerobot system for remote collaboration (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chong, N.Y., et al.: Multioperator teleoperation of multirobot systems with time delay: part II—testbed description. Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11(3), 292 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forman, R.E.: Objective performance metrics for improved space telerobotics training. (Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from Available from database (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, C.J., et al.: Development of a team workload assessment technique for the main control room of advanced nuclear power plants. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 21(4), 397–411 (2011). doi: 10.1002/hfm.20247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mengdi Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yijing Zhang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Cheng Zhu
    • 4
  • Zhizhong Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.National Key Laboratory of Human Factors EngineeringBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.China Astronaut Research and Training CenterBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Science and Technology on Information Systems Engineering LaboratoryNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations