Advertisement

Agent-Based Practices for an Intelligent Tutoring System Architecture

  • Keith BrawnerEmail author
  • Greg Goodwin
  • Robert Sottilare
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9744)

Abstract

The Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) project is partially an effort to standardize the systems and processes of intelligent tutoring systems. In addition to these efforts, there is emerging research in agent-driven systems. Agent-based systems obey software and messaging communication protocols and accomplish objectives to the original system, but have different architectural structure. This paper describes the upcoming research changes for GIFT, from a module-driven system to an agent-driven system, the reasons for wanting to do so, the advantages of the change, some initial technical approaches which encapsulate current functionality, and the types of research that this change will enable in the future.

Keywords

Intelligent tutorins systems Agent based systems eLearning mLearning Software-as-a-service 

References

  1. 1.
    Sottilare, R.A., Brawner, K.W., Goldberg, B.S., Holden, H.A.: The Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). US Army Research Laboratory (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franklin, S., Graesser, A.: Is it an agent, or just a program?: a taxonomy for autonomous agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ECAI-WS 1996 and ATAL 1996. LNCS, vol. 1193, pp. 21–35. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheikes, B.A.: Gia: an agent-based architecture for intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the CIKM 1995 Workshop on Intelligent Information Agents. Citeseer (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gascueña, J.M., Fernández-Caballero, A.: An agent-based intelligent tutoring system for enhancing e-learning/e-teaching. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. 2, 11–24 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lopes, C.R.: A multiagent architecture for distance education systems. In: Null, p. 368. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chepegin, V., Aroyo, L., De Bra, P., Houben, G.: CHIME: service-oriented framework for adaptive web-based systems. In: Conferentie Informatiewetenschap, pp. 29–36. Citeseer (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, F., Holt, P., Leung, S., Hogeboom, M., Cao, Y.: A multi-agent and service-oriented architecture for developing integrated and intelligent web-based education systems. In: International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning at the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regan, D.A.: The training and learning architecture: infrastructure for the future of learning. In: Invited Keynote International Symposium on Information Technology and Communication in Education (SINTICE), Madrid, Spain (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Regan, D., Raybourn, E.M., Durlach, P.: Learning modeling consideration for a personalized assistant for learning (PAL). In: Design Recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Learner Modeling, vol. 1 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wray, R.E., Woods, A.: A cognitive systems approach to tailoring learner practice. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems ACS, p. 38 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’mello, S., Graesser, A.: Autotutor and affective autotutor: learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. (TiiS) 2, 23 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramirez, G.A., Baltrušaitis, T., Morency, L.-P.: Modeling latent discriminative dynamic of multi-dimensional affective signals. In: D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Schuller, B., Martin, J.-C. (eds.) ACII 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6975, pp. 396–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duong, H., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., Heffernan, N.: A prediction model that uses the sequence of attempts and hints to better predict knowledge: “better to attempt the problem first, rather than ask for a hint”. In: Educational Data Mining 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Y.-E., Mandel, T., Brunskill, E., Popovic, Z.: Trading off scientific knowledge and user learning with multi-armed bandits. In: Educational Data Mining, London, UK (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lane, H.C., Hays, M., Core, M., Gomboc, D., Forbell, E., Auerbach, D., Rosenberg, M.: Coaching intercultural communication in a serious game. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 35–42 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benjamin, N., Xiangen, H., Graesser, A., Zhiqiang, C.: Autotutor in the cloud: a service-oriented paradigm for an interoperable natural-language its. J. Adv. Distrib. Learn. Technol. 2, 49–63 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Army Research LaboratoryAdelphiUSA

Personalised recommendations