Advertisement

Rethinking Public Transport Services for the Elderly Through a Transgenerational Design Approach

  • Roberta Grimaldi
  • Antonio Opromolla
  • Giovanni Andrea Parente
  • Eliseo SciarrettaEmail author
  • Valentina Volpi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9755)

Abstract

In discussing the city suitability to people’s needs, generally a special attention has been given to people with special needs, e.g. the elderly. In this sense, most of the research about accessible cities has focused on the architectural design of public spaces, aiming at ensuring the access to urban places through the removal of architectural barriers. However, as technologies have been diffusing in many different city services, it also should be given attention to the constraints derived from this unavoidable change affecting the elderly life. The focus is on the potential of the technologies for improving the elderly city experience. In this paper the authors, starting from the principles of the transgenerational design, focus on how the technologies applied to the public transportation services could improve citizen experience and promote really inclusive mobility services.

Keywords

Transgenerational design Public transport service Elderly Redesign Technology adoption 

References

  1. 1.
    Anthopoulos, L.G.: Understanding the smart city domain: a literature review. In: Bolivar, M.P. (ed.) Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology Series: New York, vol. 8, pp. 9–21. Springer International Publishing, New York (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cocchia, A.: Smart and digital city: a systematic literature review. In: Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (eds.) Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space. Progress in IS Series, pp. 13–43. Springer International Publishing, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) The Future Internet. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 431–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anttiroiko, A., Valkama, P., Bailey, S.J.: Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services. AI Soc. 29(3), 323–334 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitchin, R.: The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79(1), 1–14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hernandez-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., Gómez-Zúñiga, B.: ICT and older people: beyond usability. Educ. Gerontol. 35(3), 226–245 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanson, V.L.: Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interact. Comput. 22(6), 502–509 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magnusson, L., Hanson, E., Borg, M.: A literature review study of information and communication technology as a support for frail older people living at home and their family carers. Technol. Disabil. 16(4), 223–235 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milligan, C.: There’s No Place Like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Farnham (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blaschke, C.M., Freddolino, P.P., Mullen, E.E.: Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature. Br. J. Soc. Work 39(4), 641–656 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Augusto, J.C., Nakashima, H., Aghajan, H.: Ambient intelligence and smart environments: a state of the art. In: Nakashima, H., Aghajan, H., Augusto, J.C. (eds.) Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, pp. 3–31. Springer, US (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Acebillo, J.: UrbAging: designing urban space for an ageing society. In: NFP 54, SNF, Bern (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    LoukaitouSideris, A., LevyStorms, L., Brozen, M.: Placemaking for an Aging Population: Guidelines for Senior-Friendly Parks. UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, Los Angeles (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams, K.: Spatial planning, urban form and sustainable transport: an introduction. In: Williams, K. (ed.) Spatial Planning, Urban Form and Sustainable Transport, pp. 1–13. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vigoda, E.: From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Pub. Adm. Rev. 62(5), 527–540 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gilhooly, M., Hamilton, K., O’Neill, M., Gow, J., Webster, N., Pike, F.: Transport and ageing: extending quality of life via public and private transport. In: ESRC Research Findings from the Growing Older Programme 16. Economic and Social Research Council Swindon, Wiltshire (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eurostat: Eurostat Regional Yearbook 2014. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bekiaris, E., Panou, M., Mousadakou, A.: Elderly and disabled travelers needs in infomobility services. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 853–860. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer, G., Sullivan J.F.: Human-centered public transportation systems for persons with cognitive disabilities. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Participatory Design Conference, Malmő, Sweden, June 23–25, pp. 194–198 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tranter, R.T., Slater, R., Vaughan, N.: Barriers to mobility: physically disabled and frail elderly people in their local outdoor environment. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 14(4), 303–312 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phillips, J., Walford, N., Hockey, A., Foreman, N., Lewis, M.: Older people and outdoor environments: pedestrian anxieties and barriers in the use of familiar and unfamiliar spaces. Geoforum 47, 113–124 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanson, J.: The Inclusive City, What Active Ageing Might Mean for Urban Design, pp. 143–145. University College, London (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parker, C.J., May, A., Mitchell, V., Burrows, A.: Capturing volunteered information for inclusive service design: potential benefits and challenges. Des. J. 16(2), 197–218 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bogren, L., Fallman, D., Henje, C.: User-centered inclusive design: making public transport accessible. In: International Conference on Inclusive Design–Royal College of Art, London, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sayago, S., Sloan, D., Blat, J.: Everyday use of computer-mediated communication tools and its evolution over time: an ethnographical study with older people. Interact. Comput. 23(5), 543–554 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Subasi, Ö., Leitner, M., Hoeller, N., Geven, A., Tscheligi, M.: Designing accessible experiences for older users: user requirement analysis for a railway ticketing portal. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(4), 391–402 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grotenhuis, J.W., Wiegmans, B.W., Rietveld, P.: The desired quality of integrated multimodal travel information in public transport: customer needs for time and effort savings. Transp. Policy 14(1), 27–38 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pirkl, J.J.: Transgenerational Design: Products for an Aging Population. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pirkl, J.J., Babic, A.L.: Guidelines and Strategies for Designing Transgenerational Products: A Resource Manual for Industrial Design Professionals. Copley Publishing, Acton, Massachusetts (1988)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Home of Transgenerational Design Matters. http://www.transgenerational.org/
  32. 32.
    Cagan, J., Craig, M.V.: Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval. FT Press, NJ (2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D.: Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 65(6), 645–653 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    World Health Organization, http://www.who.int
  35. 35.
    Pernice, K., Estes, J., Nielsen, J.: Senior Citizens (Ages 65 and older) on the Web. Nielsen Norman Group (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Grimaldi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio Opromolla
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giovanni Andrea Parente
    • 1
  • Eliseo Sciarretta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Valentina Volpi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Link Campus UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.ISIA Roma DesignRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations