Advertisement

Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation as a Tool for Aging and Driving Research

  • Christopher R. Bennett
  • Richard R. Corey
  • Uro Giudice
  • Nicholas A. GiudiceEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9755)

Abstract

The aging process is associated with changes to many tasks of daily life for older adults, e.g. driving. This is particularly challenging in rural areas where public transportation is often non-existent. The current study explored how age affects driving ability through use of an immersive virtual reality driving simulator. Participants were required to respond to typical driving events: stopping at an intersection, controlling vehicle speed, and avoiding objects in the road. Results showed that older adult performance was consistently lower than the younger adult group for each driving event, and matched those of real-world accident data. Post-study survey data suggested that all participants were able to easily interact with the driving simulator. Results also demonstrate the efficacy of immersive virtual reality as an effective research tool. Findings from this research will influence the development of compensatory augmentations, or navigational aids, and enrich our understanding of driving and age-related concerns.

Keywords

Spatial cognition Aging Gerontechnology Human computer interaction Virtual reality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank everyone at the VEMI lab for their assistance creating the driving simulator. We specifically thank Jonathan Cole for his development of the VR software used during this research. We acknowledge funding support for this project provided by a University of Maine Aging Research and Technology Seed Grant awarded to Dr. Nicholas Giudice and Dr. Richard Corey.

References

  1. 1.
    Mooney, J.: Driving status and out-of-home social activity levels: the case of older male veterans. GRC News 22(3), 3 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization: The Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts-Second Edition (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United States Census Bureau: Census Data (2008). http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2008.html
  4. 4.
    Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: Highway Safety Research and Communications (2012). http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/older-drivers/fatalityfacts/older-people/2012#Trends
  5. 5.
    García-Betances, R.I., Arredondo Waldmeyer, M.T., Fico, G., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F.: A succinct overview of virtual reality technology use in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, 80 (2015). doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00080 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks, J.O., Goodenough, R.R., Crisler, M.C., Klein, N.D., Alley, R.L., Koon, B.L., Wills, R.F.: Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42(3), 788–796 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Klencklen, G., Després, O., Dufour, A.: What do we know about aging and spatial cognition? Reviews and perspectives. Ageing Res. Rev. 11(1), 123–135 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moffat, S.D.: Aging and spatial navigation: what do we know and where do we go? Neuropsychol. Rev. 19(4), 478–489 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J.L., Chertkow, H.: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53, 695–699 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keshavarz, B., Riecke, B.E., Hettinger, L.J., Campos, J.L.: Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? Front. Psychol. 6, 472 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strayer, D.L., Drew, F.A.: Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 46(4), 640–649 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, T.L., Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V.: Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Hum. Factors 43, 462–482 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J.D., Vaven, B., Haake, S., Brown, T.L.: Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: the effects of speech-based e-mail on drivers’ attention to the roadway. Hum. Factors 43, 631–640 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jager, R.D., Mieler, W.F., Miller, J.W.: Age-related macular degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 358(24), 2606–2617 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tan, O., Li, G., Lu, A.T.H., Varma, R., Huang, D., Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study Group: Mapping of macular substructures with optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology 115(6), 949–956 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher R. Bennett
    • 1
  • Richard R. Corey
    • 1
  • Uro Giudice
    • 1
  • Nicholas A. Giudice
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Computing and Information ScienceThe University of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations