Advertisement

Older People’s Use and Learning of New Media: A Case Study on Remote Rural Villages in Finnish Lapland

  • Päivi RasiEmail author
  • Arja Kilpeläinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9755)

Abstract

People aged 65+ generally use new media technologies less, in less mobile ways, and for less versatile purposes than younger age groups do. This has raised concerns about older people’s potential exclusion from the digital society. In this paper we present a case study on how older people, who were living in small rural villages in Finnish Lapland, use new media in their everyday lives. According to the participants, how do they use new media in their everyday lives? How do they learn to use new media? Our results point to the diversity in terms of the participants’ self-reported Internet use and related skills. The results also indicate that the participants’ social networks, especially grandchildren, play a more important role in their use of and learning about new media technologies than formal instruction does. Therefore, it is important to recognize that older people who lack social networks are most vulnerable in terms of being excluded from the digital society.

Keywords

Older people Internet use Internet non-use Rural areas New media technologies 

References

  1. 1.
    Ofcom. Office of Communications: Adults’ Media Use and Attitudes. Report 2015 (2015). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-lit-10years/2015_Adults_media_use_and_attitudes_report.pdf
  2. 2.
    Quinn, K.: Learning new tricks: the use of social media in later life. In: Harrington, C.L., Bielby, D.D., Bardo, A.R. (eds.) Aging, Media, and Culture, pp. 183–192. Lexington Books, Lanham (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tilastokeskus: Väestön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö 2015 [Use of Information and Communication Technology by individuals] (2015). http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2015/sutivi_2015_2015-11-26_fi.pdf
  4. 4.
    Abad, L.: Media literacy for older people facing the digital divide: the e-inclusion programmes design. Comunicar Media Educ. Res. J. 21, 173–180 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boase, J.: The consequences of personal networks for internet use in rural areas. Am. Behav. Sci. 9, 1257–1267 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Awan, F., Gauntlett, D.: Remote living: exploring online (and offline) experiences of young people living in rural areas. Eur. J. Cult. Stud. 16, 3–23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Buse, C.E.: When you retire, does everything become leisure? Information and communication technology use and the work/leisure boundary in retirement. New Media Soc. 11, 1143–1161 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 870–882 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kilpeläinen, A., Seppänen, M.: Information technology and everyday life in ageing rural villages. J. Rural Stud. 33, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vroman, K.G., Arthanat, S., Lysack, C.: “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 156–166 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chamberlain, K., Hodgetts, D.: Social psychology and media: critical considerations. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 2, 1109–1125 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Talsi, N.: Kodin koneet: Teknologioiden kotouttaminen, käyttö ja vastustus [Mundane Machines: Domesticating, Using and Opposing Technologies]. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies, No. 75 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hakkarainen, P.: “No good for shovelling snow and carrying firewood”: social representations of computers and the internet by elderly Finnish non-users. New Media Soc. 14, 1198–1215 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rasi, P., O’Neil, C.: Dinosaurs and fossils living without dangerous tools: social representations of computers and the internet by elderly Finnish and American non-users. Seminar.net: Int. J. Media Technol. Lifelong Learn. 10, 56–72 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milbourne, P., Kitchen, L.: Rural mobilities: connecting movement and fixity in rural places. J. Rural Stud. 34, 326–336 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrington, C.L., Bielby, D.D., Bardo, A.R.: New areas of inquiry in aging, media, and culture. In: Harrington, C.L., Bielby, D.D., Bardo, A.R. (eds.) Aging, Media, and Culture, pp. 1–9. Lexington Books, Lanham (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ofcom. Office of Communications: Media Literacy Audit: Report on Media Literacy Amongst Older People (2006). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/older.pdf
  19. 19.
    Davies, A.: On constructing ageing rural populations: “capturing” the grey nomad. J. Rural Stud. 27, 191–199 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie, B., Watkins, I., Golbeck, J., Huang, M.: Understanding and changing older adults’ perceptions and learning of social media. Educ. Gerontol. 38, 282–296 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    González, C., Fanjul, C., Cabezuelo, F.: Consumption and knowledge of new technologies by elderly people in France, United Kingdom and Spain. Comunicar Media Educ. Res. J. 23, 19–27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E., Thumim, N.: Adult Media Literacy: A Review of the Research Literature on Behalf of Ofcom. Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, London (2005). http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4155054.pdf Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hyvönen, P., Romero, M., Hakkarainen, P., Impiö, N.: Creative collaboration for enhancing older adult’s ICT use. In: Presentation at the EARLI Biennial Conference, 27–31 August, Munchen, Germany (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sánchez, M., Kapland, M.S., Bradley, L.: Using technology to connect generations: some considerations of form and function. Comunicar Media Educ. Res. J. 45, 95–103 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rasi, P., Kilpeläinen, A.: The digital competences and agency of older people living in rural villages in Finnish Lapland. Seminar.net. Int. J. Media Technol. Lifelong Learn. 11, 149–160 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kilpeläinen, A., Rasi, P.: Paikallisuuden paradokseja digiajassa: Lappilaisissa sivukylissä asuvien ikäihmisten digitaaliset kompetenssit paikallisuuden valossa. In: Luoto, I., Kattilakoski, M., Backa, P. (eds.) Paikkaperustainen aluekehittäminen [Place-Based Regional Development]. Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy, Helsinki, Finland (in press)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jyrkämä, J.: Toimijuus, ikääntyminen ja arkielämä – hahmottelua teoreettis-metodologiseksi viitekehykseksi [Agency, aging and everyday life: an outline for a theoretical-methodological framework]. Gerontologia 4, 190–203 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferrari, A.: Digcomp: a framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. In: European Commission, Joint Research Centre–Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Media Pedagogy, Faculty of EducationUniversity of LaplandRovaniemiFinland
  2. 2.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of LaplandRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations