Advertisement

Effect of Icon Amount and Visual Density on Usability of Smartwatches

  • Fan MoEmail author
  • Shuping Yi
  • Jia Zhou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9754)

Abstract

Appropriate design for smartwatches menu on the tiny touchscreen is desired and, hence, this study aims to explore the effect of icon amount and visual density on older adults’ performance and satisfaction. To achieve this goal, an experiment was conducted. A total of 15 older adults participated in this study. The results of this study showed which combination of visual density and icon amount was better on the tiny screen (e.g., 40 mm wide and 40 mm high). First, a small number of icon amount (e.g., 8 icons) was generally better used in smartwatches menu. In that case, both visual density of 4 icons per page and 8 icons per page caused better performance. Second, compared with 1 icon and 8 icons per page, the visual density of 4 icons per page might was the best choice if the number of icon amount was large (e.g., 24 icons and 48 icons). Finally, the study also indicated that older adults’ gestures of wearing smartwatches on the back of wrist, taping with the index finger and closing hand related to better performance.

Keywords

Smartwatches menu Icon amount Visual density Older adults Users’ gestures 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported with funding from a National Science Foundation China grant 71401018.

References

  1. 1.
    Chae, M., Kim, J.: Do size and structure matter to mobile users? an empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behav. Inf. Technol. 23, 165–181 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.L.P., Salvendy, G.: Older adults’ use of smart phones: an investigation of the factors influencing the acceptance of new functions. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33, 552–560 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ziefle, M.: Instruction formats and navigation aids in mobile devices. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2008. LNCS, vol. 5298, pp. 339–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ziefle, M.: Information presentation in small screen devices: the trade-off between visual density and menu foresight. Appl. Ergon. 41, 719–730 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, M.J., Yoon, S.K., Choi, J.H.: A study of menu structure on smartwatch for effective navigation - focused on types of menu and color cues. J. Digit. Des. 15, 395–406 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perrault, S.T., Lecolinet, E., Eagan, J., Guiard, Y.: Watchit: simple gestures and eyes-free interaction for wristwatches and bracelets. In: the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1451–1460. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knibbe, J., Martinez Plasencia, D., Bainbridge, C., Chan, C.K., Wu, J., Cable, T., Coyle, D.: Extending interaction for smart watches: enabling bimanual around device control. In: The CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1891–1896. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cho, H., Kim, M., Seo, K.: A text entry technique for wrist-worn watches with tiny touchscreens. In: The 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 79–80. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Komninos, A., Dunlop, M.: Text input on a smart watch. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 13, 50–58 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hara, K., Umezawa, T., Osawa, N.: Effect of button size and location when pointing with index finger on smartwatch. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. LNCS, vol. 9170, pp. 165–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shen, Z., Xue, C., Li, J., Zhou, X.: Effect of icon density and color contrast on users’ visual perception in human computer interaction. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9174, pp. 66–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    TalkingData. 2014 China mobile Internet report. http://www.talkingdata.com/index/#/datareport/-1/zh_cn
  14. 14.
    Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 14, 463–488 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.L.P., Salvendy, G.: Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: a review and appraisal. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 28, 799–826 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations