Board Games and Regulars’ Tables — Extending User Centred Design in the Mobia Project

  • Johannes Tröger
  • Jan AlexanderssonEmail author
  • Jochen Britz
  • Maurice Rekrut
  • Daniel Bieber
  • Kathleen Schwarz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9754)


To allow persons with mobility issues to remain mobile, the three-year project Mobia set out to develop a technology-supported human-based service within public transport: mobility guides provide a helping hand for passengers with mobility issues. The Mobia system can be positioned within the field of AAL and consists of multiple user interfaces and actors to coordinate and realise the point of service. This paper introduces two extension to the User-Centred Design methodology which were successfully applied during the course of the project. The first is the development of a large board game like demonstrator that allows for simulation of realistic scenarios within the scenario during which observation of user behaviour can take place. The second – regulars’ table – is a monthly face2face meeting between developers, passengers and mobility guides serving as a platform for exchanging experiences, testing and discussing new ideas. Results from the Mobia project are discussed.


User-centred design AAL Board game Public transport 


  1. 1.
    Wichert, R., Klausing, H. (eds.): Ambient Assisted Living: 7. AAL-Kongress 2014, Berlin, Germany, January 21-22, 2014. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexandersson, J., et al.: Oil in the machine: technical support for a human-centred service system for public transport. In: Wichert, R., Klausing, H. (eds.) Ambient Assisted Living. Advanced Technologies and Societal Change, pp. 157–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bähr, M., et al.: PASSAge: personalized mobility, assistance and service systems in an ageing society. In: Wichert, R., Klausing, H. (eds.) Ambient Assisted Living. Advanced Technologies and Societal Change, pp. 109–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barr, S.H., Baker, T., Markham, S.K., Kingon, A.I.: Bridging the valley of death: lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education. Acad. Manage. Learn. Educ. 8(3), 370–388 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO/DIS 9241-210. (2010). Ergonomics of Human System Interaction-Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. International Standardization Organization (ISO), Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frey, J., Bergweiler, S., Alexandersson, J., Gholamsaghaee, E., Reithinger, N., Stahl, C.: Smartcase: a smart home environment in a suitcase. In: 2011 7th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), pp. 378–381, Best Demo Award. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S., Persson, J., Cajander, Å.: Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22(6), 397–409 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harper, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., Sellen, A. (eds.): Being Human: Human-Computer Interaction in the Year 2020. Microsoft Research Ltd., Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iivari, J., Iivari, N.: Varieties of user-centredness: an analysis of four systems development methods. Inf. Syst. J. 21(2), 125–153 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanis, M., Alizadeh, S., Groen, J., Khalili, M., Robben, S., Bakkes, S., Kröse, B.: Ambient monitoring from an elderly-centred design perspective: what, who and how. In: Keyson, D.V., et al. (eds.) AmI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7040, pp. 330–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanis, M., Robben, S., Kröse, B.: Miniature play: using an interactive dollhouse to demonstrate ambient interactions in the home. In: Proceedings of DIS (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P.: Ambient intelligence in assisted living: enable elderly people to handle future interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007 (Part II). LNCS, vol. 4555, pp. 103–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(50), 752–780 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lowdermilk, T.: User-Centered Design: A Developer’s Guide to Building User-Friendly Applications. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marti, P., Bannon, L.J.: Exploring user-centred design in practice: some caveats. Knowl. Technol. Policy 22(1), 7–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pruitt, J., Grudin, J.: Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, pp. 1–15. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salvi, D., Colomer, J.B.M., Arredondo, M.T., Prazak-Aram, B.: A framework for evaluating ambient assisted living technologies and the experience of the universAAL project. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 7(3), 329–352 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scacchi, W.: Socio-technical design. Encycl. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1, 656–659 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verrillo, R.T.: Age related changes in the sensitivity to vibration. Chin. J. Gerontol. 35(2), 185–193 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wikipedia: Technology Readiness Level (2016). Accessed 7 Feb 2016
  22. 22.
    Zajicek, M.: Interface design for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, pp. 60–65. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, X., Carré, M., Rowson, J.: Effect on frequency changing of tactile feedback on touchscreen devices. In: Design 4 Health, 3–5 July 2013, Sheffield, UK Sheffield Hallam University, pp. 316–322 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Tröger
    • 1
  • Jan Alexandersson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jochen Britz
    • 1
  • Maurice Rekrut
    • 1
  • Daniel Bieber
    • 2
  • Kathleen Schwarz
    • 2
  1. 1.DFKI GmbHSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Iso-Institut e.VSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations