Virtual Humans as Centaurs: Melding Real and Virtual

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9740)

Abstract

Centaurs are man-machine teams that can work together on problems and can out-perform, either people or computers working alone in domains as varied as chess-playing and protein folding. But the centaur of Greek mythology was not a team, but rather a hybrid of man and horse with some of the characteristics of each. In this paper, we outline our efforts to build virtual humans, which might be considered hybrid centaurs, combining features of both people and machines. We discuss experimental evidence that shows that these virtual human hybrids can outperform both people and inanimate processes in some tasks such as medical interviewing.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Virtual humans Intelligent agents Virtual reality Centaurs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The effort described here is supported by DARPA under contract W911NF-04-D-0005 and the U.S. Army. Any opinion, content or information presented does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the United States Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

References

  1. 1.
    Cassidy, M.: Centaur Chess Shows Power of Teaming Human and Machine, Huffpost Technology (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khatib, F., et al.: Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108(47), 18949–18953 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swartout, W., et al.: Toward virtual humans. AI Mag. 27(1), 96 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swartout, W.: Lessons learned from virtual humans. AI Mag. 31(1), 9–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krämer, N.C., Tietz, B., Bente, G.: Effects of embodied interface agents and their gestural activity. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 292–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gratch, J., et al.: Can virtual humans be more engaging than real ones? In: 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Beijing, China (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeVault, D., et al.: SimSensei Kiosk: a virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucas, G.M., et al.: It’s only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 94–100 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rizzo, A., et al.: Automatic behavior analysis during a clinical interview with a virtual human. Stud. Healthc. Technol. 220, 316 (2016). (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USC Institute for Creative TechnologiesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations