Advertisement

A Health Policy Simulation Model of Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever and Zika Fever

  • Setsuya KurahashiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 58)

Abstract

This study proposes a simulation model of a new type of infectious disease based on Ebola haemorrhagic fever and Zika fever. SIR (Susceptible, Infected, Recovered) model has been widely used to analyse infectious diseases such as influenza, smallpox, bioterrorism, to name a few. On the other hand, Agent-based model begins to spread in recent years. The model enables to represent behaviour of each person in the computer. It also reveals the spread of an infection by simulation of the contact process among people in the model. The study designs a model based on Epstein’s model in which several health policies are decided such as vaccine stocks, antiviral medicine stocks, the number of medical staff to infection control measures and so on. Furthermore, infectious simulation of Ebola haemorrhagic fever and Zika fever, which have not yet any effective vaccine, is also implemented in the model. As results of experiments using the model, it has been found that preventive vaccine, antiviral medicine stocks and the number of medical staff are crucial factors to prevent the spread. In addition, a modern city is vulnerable to Zika fever due to commuting by train.

Keywords

Infectious disease Ebola haemorrhagic fever Zika fever 

References

  1. 1.
    Burke, D.S., et al.: Individual based computational modeling of smallpox epidemic control strategies. In: Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1142–1149 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Longini, Jr., Ira, M., et al.: Containing a large bioterrorist smallpox attack: a computer simulation approach. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 11(2), 98–108 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilbert, N.: Agent-Based Models, no. 153. Sage (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Easley, D., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okabe, N.: Risk and benefit of immunisation: infectious disease prevention with immunization. Iryo Shakai 21(1), 33–40 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, L.H., Hamer, D.H.: Zika Virus: rapid spread in the western hemisphere. Ann. Intern. Med. (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hennessey, M., Fischer, M., Staples, J.E.: Zika virus spreads to new areas—region of the americas, May 2015–Jan 2016. In: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 55–58 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    WHO: Zika virus, World Health Organization, Media centre, Fact sheets, Jan 2016Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epstein, J.M., et al.: Toward a containment strategy for smallpox bioterror: an individual-based computational approach (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, J.M.: Generative social science: studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohkusa, Y.: An evaluation of counter measures for smallpox outbreak using an individual based model and taking into consideration the limitation of human resources of public health workers. Iryo Shakai 16(3), 284–295 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Business SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations