Gamification and Social Dynamics: Insights from a Corporate Cycling Campaign

  • Matthias Wunsch
  • Agnis Stibe
  • Alexandra Millonig
  • Stefan Seer
  • Ryan C C Chin
  • Katja Schechtner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9749)

Abstract

Cycling is an essential transport mode in a well-balanced urban transportation system. While most approaches for achieving an increase from today’s usually low levels of biking are focusing mainly on infrastructure measures and policies, this study presents the effects of the Biking Tourney, a bike commuting challenge between 14 companies aiming at motivating employees to commute by bike. This six-week study involved 239 participants using a socially influencing system for reporting commutes and watching the rankings. The frequency of bike commuting increased for 15 % of overall participants due to their participation. Within the subgroup of occasional bike commuters an even higher share of 30 % commuted by bike more frequently. Further analysis discusses multiple factors contributing to the engagement of employees in the tourney. As the results show the persuasiveness of the intervention, implications for a large-scale implementation are discussed.

Keywords

Low-energy mobility Cycling Behavior change Transportation Sustainability Socially influencing systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Lähteenoja, S., Lettenmeier, M., Kauppinen, T., Luoto, K., Moisio, T., Salo, M., Tamminen, P., Veuro, S.: Natural resource consumption caused by finnish households. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Consumer Policy Research Conference Helsinki (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Randelhoff, M.: Vergleich unterschiedlicher Flächeninanspruchnahmen nach Verkehrsarten (pro Person)  » Zukunft Mobilität. http://www.zukunft-mobilitaet.net/78246/analyse/flaechenbedarf-pkw-fahrrad-bus-strassenbahn-stadtbahn-fussgaenger-metro-bremsverzoegerung-vergleich/
  3. 3.
    Richter, J., Friman, M., Gärling, T.: Soft transport policy measures: gaps in knowledge. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 5, 199–215 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wunsch, M., Millonig, A., Seer, S., Schechtner, K., Stibe, A., Chin, R.C.C.: Challenged to Bike: Assessing the Potential Impact of Gamified Cycling Initiatives. Presented at the Transportation Research Board (TRB) 95th Annual Meeting 2016 (accepted). Washington, DC (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stibe, A.: Towards a framework for socially influencing systems: meta-analysis of four PLS-SEM based studies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 172–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wunsch, M., Stibe, A., Millonig, A., Seer, S., Dai, C., Schechtner, K., Chin, R.C.C.: What makes you bike? exploring persuasive strategies to encourage low-energy mobility. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 53–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCall, R., Koenig, V., Kracheel, M.: Using gamification and metaphor to design a mobility platform for commuters. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 5, 1–15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jylhä, A., Nurmi, P., Sirén, M., Hemminki, S., Jacucci, G.: Matkahupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, pp. 227–230. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deutsch, M.: A theory of cooperation-competition and beyond. Handb. Theor. Soc. Psychol. 2, 275 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guerin, B.: Social facilitation. Wiley Online Library (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Maat, K.: Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 30, 59–96 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rose, G., Marfurt, H.: Travel behaviour change impacts of a major ride to work day event. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 41, 351–364 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Wunsch
    • 1
    • 3
  • Agnis Stibe
    • 2
  • Alexandra Millonig
    • 1
  • Stefan Seer
    • 1
  • Ryan C C Chin
    • 2
  • Katja Schechtner
    • 2
  1. 1.Austrian Institute of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.MIT Media LabCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Human Computer InteractionVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations