Advertisement

Laughter and Humour as Conversational Mind-Reading Displays

  • Gary McKeown
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9749)

Abstract

Laughter and humor are pervasive phenomena in conversational interactions. This paper argues that they function as displays of mind-reading abilities in social interactions–as suggested by the Analogical Peacock Hypothesis (APH). In this view, they are both social bonding signals and can elevate one’s social status. The relational combination of concepts in humor is addressed. However, it is in the inclusion of context and receiver knowledge, required by the APH view, that it contributes the most to existing theories. Taboo and offensive humor are addressed in terms of costly signaling, and implications for human computer interaction and some possible routes to solutions are suggested.

Keywords

Laughter Humor Social bonding Evolution Context 

References

  1. 1.
    Glenn, P.J.: Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A.: Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In: Button, G., Lee, J.R.E. (eds.) Talk and Social Organisation. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachorowski, J.A., Owren, M.J.: Not all laughs are alike: voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psychol. Sci. 12(3), 252–257 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Owren, M.J., Bachorowski, J.A.: The evolution of emotional expression: a “selfish-gene” account of smiling and laughter in early hominids and humans. In: Mayne, T.J., Bonanno, G.A. (eds.) Emotions: Current Issues and Future Directions. The Guilford Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Provine, R.: Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. Faber and Faber, London (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Provine, R.: Laughing, tickling, and the evolution of speech and self. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13(6), 215–218 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smoski, M., Bachorowski, J.A.: Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cogn. Emot. 17(2), 327–340 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ross, D.M., Owren, M.J., Zimmermann, E.: Reconstructing the evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Curr. Biol. 19(13), 1106–1111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Preuschoft, S., van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M.: The social function of “Smile” and “Laughter”: variations across primate species and societies. In: Segerstråle, U., Molnár, P. (eds.) Nonverbal Communication: Where Nature Meets Culture, pp. 171–189. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahweh (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Preuschoft, S., van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M.: A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling. In: Hinde, R.A. (ed.) Nonverbal Communication: Where Nature Meets Culture, pp. 209–241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grammer, K.: Strangers meet: laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. J. Nonverbal Behav. 14(4), 209–236 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grammer, K., Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.: The ritualisation of laughter. In: Koch, W.A. (ed.) Natürlichkeit der Sprache und der Kultur: acta colloquii - Bochum, Bochumer Beiträge zur Semiotik; 18, pp. 192–214 (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mehu, M., Dunbar, R.I.M.: Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour 145(12), 1747–1780 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKeown, G., Curran, W.: The Relationship Between Laughter Intensity and Perceived Humour. The Fourth Interdisciplinary Workshop on Laughter and other Non-Verbal Vocalisations in Speech 27–29 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dezecache, G., Dunbar, R.I.M.: Sharing the joke: the size of natural laughter groups. Evol. Hum. Behav. 33(6), 775–779 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, R.A.: The Psychology of Humor. Academic Press, London (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panksepp, J., Burgdorf, J.: Laughing rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy? Physiol. Behav. 79(3), 533–547 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsusaka, T.: When does play panting occur during social play in wild chimpanzees? Primates 45(4), 221–229 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gervais, M., Wilson, D.S.: The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: a synthetic approach. Q. Rev. Biol. 80(4), 395–430 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holt, E.: The last laugh: shared laughter and topic termination. J. Pragmatics 42(6), 1513–1525 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKeown, G.J.: The analogical peacock hypothesis: the sexual selection of mind-reading and relational cognition in human communication. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17(3), 267–287 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Byrne, R.W., Whiten, A.: Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunbar, R.I.M.: Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Faber and Faber, London (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunbar, R.I.M.: The social brain hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 6, 178–190 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dunbar, R.I.M., Shultz, S.: Evolution in the social brain. Science 317, 1344–1347 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stiller, J., Dunbar, R.I.M.: Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Soc. Netw. 29(1), 93–104 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heyes, C.M., Frith, C.D.: The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science 344(6190), 1243091–1243091 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller, G.F.: The Mating Mind. Vintage, London (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller, G.F.: Mating intelligence: frequently asked questions. In: Geher, G., Miller, G.F. (eds.) Mating Intelligence: Sex, Relationships, and the Mind’s Reproductive System. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gentner, D.: Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7, 155–170 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Holyoak, K.J., Hummel, J.E.: Toward an understanding of analogy within a biological symbol system. In: Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J., Kokinov, B.N. (eds.) The Analogical Mind, pp. 161–195. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Hutchinson & Co., New York (2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Veale, T.: The humour of exceptional cases: jokes as compressed thought experiments. In: Brone, G., Feyaerts, K., Veale, T. (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research, pp. 69–90. de Gruyter, Boston (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koestler, A.: The Act of Creation. Penguin, London (1964)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Raskin, V., Hempelmann, C.F., Taylor, J.M.: How to understand and assess a theory: the evolution of the SSTH into the GTVH and now into the OSTH. J. Literary Theor. 3(2), 285–311 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schröder, M., et al.: Building autonomous sensitive artificial listeners. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3(2), 165–183 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Horton, W.S.: Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Mem. Cogn. 35(1), 87–94 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Horton, W.S.: Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor Symbol 28(3), 148–166 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Holt, E., Drew, P.: Figurative pivots: the use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transition. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 38(1), 35–61 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McGettigan, C., et al.: Individual differences in laughter perception reveal roles for mentalizing and sensorimotor systems in the evaluation of emotional authenticity. Cereb. Cortex 25(1), 246–257 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Van Valen, L.: A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theor. 1, 1–30 (1973)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ruch, W.: Assessment of appreciation of humor: studies with the 3 WD humor test. In: Speilberger, C.D., Butcher, J.N. (eds.) Advances in Personality Assessment, pp. 27–75. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Progovac, L., Locke, J.L.: The urge to merge: ritual insult and the evolution of syntax. Biolinguistics 3(2–3), 337–354 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations