Managing Innovation in Multicultural Environments: An Imperative of Responsibility Within Interorganizational Networks

  • Monika Petraite
  • Xavier Pavie
  • Jolita Ceicyte
  • Brigita Janiunaite
  • Daphné Carthy
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The complexity of environmental, societal, economic challenges, etc. and businesses need to address with their innovation strategies and practices calls for new underlying concepts to support sustainable business behaviors within increasingly multicultural business and consumer environments. We address the issue of responsibility and coordinated decision making innovation in multicultural networks, and define critical steps for managing innovation within inter-organizational networks via creation of long-term stakeholder engagement on the international scale. The research is based on the case study of R&D intensive innovation development within multicultural interorganizational network in highly vulnerable sector of medical engineering for intensive healthcare units worldwide.

Keywords

Innovation management Responsible innovation Interorganizational networks R&D firms 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by a grant (No. GER-001/2015) from the Research Council of Lithuania. This research was performed in cooperation with the ESSEC Business School, Paris, France.

References

  1. Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Blok V, Lemmens P (2015) The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. Responsible Innov 2:19–35, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. Brundiers K, Wiek A (2010) Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov High Educ 36(2):107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Che H, Narasimhan C, Padmanabhan V (2010) Leveraging uncertainty through backorder. Quant Mark Econ 8(3):365–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesbrough HW (2003) The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 44(3):35–41Google Scholar
  6. Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2006) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY; Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman C (1992) Formal scientific and technical institutions in the national system of innovation. In: Lundvall BA (ed) National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellström T (2003) Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technol Society 25(3):369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janiunaite B, Kriaucioniene M, Jucevicius R (2004) New analytical framework of NIS based on integration of innovative performance and innovative culture indicators: the case of Lithuania. Innovation systems and development, emerging opportunities and challenges: the 2nd Globelics Conference, October 16–20, Beijing, China, pp 1–48, ISBN 7894945641Google Scholar
  11. Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  12. Kvale S (2007) Doing interviews. Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lundvall BÅ (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Meier Pleis L (2014) Overcoming uncertainty. Strateg Financ 96:21Google Scholar
  15. Moore G (1965) Moore’s law made real by Intel innovation. Intel, Santa Clara, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore G (1999) Crossing the chasm. Rev edn. HarperCollins, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ost F (1995) La Nature hors la loi. La Découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science to society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39(6):751–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, Gorman M, Fisher E, Guston D (2013) A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parayre R (2014) Uncertainty to your advantage. Convenience Store News 50:88–91Google Scholar
  22. Pavie X (2009) Une innovation responsible ? Constructif, November 2009, N 24. www.constructif.fr/bibliotheque/2009-11/une-innovation-responsable.html?item_id=2987
  23. Pavie X (2012) The importance of responsible-innovation and the necessity of innovation-care. ESSEC working paper, No. 1203Google Scholar
  24. Pavie X, Carthy D (2015) Leveraging uncertainty: a practical approach to the integration of responsible innovation through design thinking. Procedia-Social Behav Sci 213:1040–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pavie X, Egal J (2014) Innovation and responsibility: a managerial approach to the integration of responsibility in a disruptive innovation model. In: van den Hoven J et al (eds) Responsible innovation 1: innovative solutions for global issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pavie X, Scholten V, Carthy D (2014) Responsible innovation: from concept to practice. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pavie X, Jouanny C, Carthy D, Verez F (2015) Le design thinking au service de l’innovation responsible. Maxima, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Raffaelle R, Robison W, Selinger E (2010) 5 Questions: sustainability ethics. Automatic/VIP Press, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  29. Rahim ARA, Baksh MSM (2003) Case study method for new product development in engineer-to-order organizations. Work Study 52(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothwells R (1994) Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. Int Mark Rev 11(1):7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmid A (2004) Conflict and cooperation. Institutional and behavior economics. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schumpeter J (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, p 105Google Scholar
  34. Smith K (1992) Environmental hazards: asserting risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Stahl BC (2013) Responsible research and innovation: the role of privacy in an emerging framework. Sci Public Policy 40(6):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutcliffe H (2011). A report on responsible research and innovation for the European Commission, MATTER, London. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2015
  38. Taleb, N. N. (2001) [2007]. The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Tellis W (1997) Application of a case study methodology. Qual Report 3(3):1–17Google Scholar
  40. Van de Vrande V, Lemmens C, Vanhaverbeke W (2006) Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Manage 36(3):347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vanhaverbeke W (2006) The interorganizational context of open innovation. In: Chesbrough, Vanhaverbeke, West (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Vanhaverbeke W, Cloodt M, Van de Vrande V (2007) Connecting absorptive capacity and open innovation. Oslo Centre for Advanced Study, OsloGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Heintw M, Bessant J (eds) Responsible innovation. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Ward H (2005) Corporate responsibility and the business of law. Swedish Partnership for Global Responsibility. Available online http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G00195.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Petraite
    • 1
  • Xavier Pavie
    • 2
  • Jolita Ceicyte
    • 1
  • Brigita Janiunaite
    • 1
  • Daphné Carthy
    • 2
  1. 1.Kaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.ESSEC Business SchoolCergy-PontoiseFrance

Personalised recommendations