Assessment of Outcomes in Collaborative Project-Based Learning in Online Courses

  • Dmitrii A. Ivaniushin
  • Andrey V. Lyamin
  • Dmitrii S. Kopylov
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 59)

Abstract

In this paper the problem of assessment of interdisciplinary and social and personal learning outcomes is covered. The teaching and assessment tools are reviewed. The self, peer and expert assessment methods are described. The approach of assessment learning outcomes in collaborative project-based learning is proposed. This approach uses students’ behavior analysis to increase grade reliability and validity. The method allows determine irresponsible students and assign low final grade to them. The tool for carrying out collaborative project-based learning is developed. It is based on the XBlock SDK of Open edX platform.

Keywords

MOOC Project-based learning Cooperative learning Self assessment Peer assessment Expert assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by Government of Russian Federation (grant 074-U01).

References

  1. 1.
    Papano, L.: Massive Open Online Courses Are Multiplying at a Rapid Pace—The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
  2. 2.
    Rodriguez, C.: MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. Eur. J. Open Distance E-Learn. (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Downes, S.: ‘Connectivism’ and Connective Knowledge http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-downes/connectivism-and-connecti_b_804653.html
  4. 4.
    Fox, A.: From MOOCs to SPOCs. In: Communications of the ACM—2013, vol. 56, Issue 12, pp. 38–40 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lisitsyna, L.S., Lyamin, A.V.: Approach to development of effective e-Learning courses. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IET—2014, vol. 262, pp. 732–738 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Efimchik, E.A., Lyamin, A.V., Chezhin, M.S.: Automation of variant preparation and solving estimation of algorithmic tasks for virtual laboratories based on automata model. In: E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training, IET—2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lisitsyna, L.S., Pershin, A.A., Kazakov, M.A.: Game mechanics used for achieving better results of massive online. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, IET—2015, vol. 41, pp. 183–193 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopylov, D.S., Fedoreeva, M.K., Lyamin, A.V.: Game-based approach for retaining student’s knowledge and learning outcomes. In: 9th IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies, AICT 2015—Conference Proceedings, IET—2015, pp. 609–613 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Creating Peer Assessments—Creating a Peer Assessment documentation. http://edx.readthedocs.org/projects/edx-open-response-assessments/en/latest/
  10. 10.
    Cruz Matos, G.: Online peer assessment: an exploratory case study in a higher education civil engineering course. In: 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: Peer-assessment and grading of open answers in a web-based e-learning setting. In: Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 2013 International Conference, Antalya, pp. 1–7 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Marsico, M., Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: Experimental evaluation of OpenAnswer, a Bayesian framework modeling peer assessment. In: Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference, Athens, pp. 324–326 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mortazavi, B.: Self assessment surveillance using e-Portfolio. In: E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICELET), 2010 Second International Conference, Tehran, pp. 72–77 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lisitsyna, L.S., Lyamin, A.V., Skshidlevsky, A.S.: Estimation of student functional state in learning management system by heart rate variability method. In: Smart Digital Futures 2014, pp. 726–731. IOS Press (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lyamin, A.V., Cherepovskaya, E.N.: Biometric student identification using low-frequency eye tracker. In: 9th IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies, AICT 2015—Conference Proceedings, IET—2015, pp. 191–195 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mustafa, H.M.H., Al-Hamadi, A., Hassan, M.M., Al-Ghamdi, S.A., Khedr, A.A.: On assessment of students’ academic achievement considering categorized individual differences at engineering education (Neural Networks Approach). In: 2013 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, K.F.-R., Chen, J.-S.: Prediction and assessment of student learning outcomes in structural mechanics a decision support of integrating data mining and fuzzy logic. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on, Education Technology and Computer (ICETC), vol, 3, pp. 499–503 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitrii A. Ivaniushin
    • 1
  • Andrey V. Lyamin
    • 1
  • Dmitrii S. Kopylov
    • 1
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations