HCI 2016: Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques pp 241-252 | Cite as
Portable Tabletops: A Low-Cost Pen-and-Touch Approach
Abstract
This paper describes the design and implementation of a low-cost portable tabletop to be used in classrooms. This solution enables pen and touch interactions over a projected canvas. Twelve users participated in a user study that gauged the system’s effectiveness to support drawing and moving objects on the surface. Additionally, a stress test to evaluate users’ identification was conducted. Results showed that the system exhibited a fair effectiveness when users draw or move objects. Average errors of 5.6 % to 6.5 % were found when differentiating users. In general, the proposed tabletop is a promising solution at an affordable price; nevertheless, three key challenges need to be addressed before a full deployment of the solution: a better precision to draw complex shapes, a better gesture intepretation when rotating objects and achieving a minimum error for user differentiation.
Keywords
Multi-touch Portable Pen-and-touch Low-cost User differentiation Depth camera User studyReferences
- 1.Allen, J.G., Xu, R.Y.D., Jin, J.S.: Object tracking using camshift algorithm and multiple quantized feature spaces. In: Proceedings of the Pan-Sydney Area Workshop on Visual Information Processing, VIP 2005, pp. 3–7. Australian Computer Society Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia (2004). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1082121.1082122
- 2.Annett, M., Anderson, F., Bischof, W.F., Gupta, A.: The pen is mightier: Understanding stylus behaviour while inking on tablets. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2014, GI 2014, pp. 193–200. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada (2014). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2619648.2619680
- 3.Annett, M., Gupta, A., Bischof, W.F.: Exploring and understanding unintended touch during direct pen interaction. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Inter. (TOCHI) 21(5), 28 (2014)Google Scholar
- 4.Bi, X., Shi, Y., Chen, X.: uPen: A smart pen-liked device for facilitating interaction on large displays. In: First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, TableTop 2006, p. 7. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Brandl, P., Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Haller, M., Shen, C.: Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 154–161. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
- 6.Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A., Vernier, F.: How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(1), 49–59 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chen, R., Chen, P.J.R., Feng, R., Liu, Y.E., Wu, A., Mazalek, A.: SciSketch: A tabletop collaborative sketching system. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, TEI 2014, pp. 247–250, NY, USA (2013). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2540930.2540973
- 8.Collins, A., Kay, J.: Collaborative personal information management with shared, interactive tabletops. In: Proceedings of PIM 2008 CHI Workshop (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Dang, C.T., Straub, M., André, E.: Hand distinction for multi-touch tabletop interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 101–108. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Falcão, T.P., Price, S.: Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. Inter. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 6(4), 539–559 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Frisch, M., Heydekorn, J., Dachselt, R.: Diagram editing on interactive displays using multi-touch and pen gestures. In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds.) Diagrams 2010. LNCS, vol. 6170, pp. 182–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Guiard, Y.: Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. J. Motor Behav. 19(4), 486–517 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Harrison, C., Benko, H., Wilson, A.D.: Omnitouch: wearable multitouch interaction everywhere. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 441–450. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Hinckley, K., Yatani, K., Pahud, M., Coddington, N., Rodenhouse, J., Wilson, A., Benko, H., Buxton, B.: Manual deskterity: an exploration of simultaneous pen+ touch direct input. In: CHI 2010, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2793–2802. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
- 15.Kharrufa, A., Leat, D., Olivier, P.: Digital mysteries: designing for learning at the tabletop. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 197–206. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Klompmaker, F., Nebe, K., Fast, A.: Dsensingni: a framework for advanced tangible interaction using a depth camera. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 217–224. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
- 17.Liu, Y., Weibel, N., Hollan, J.D.: Interactive space: a prototyping framework for touch and gesture on and above the desktop. In: CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1233–1238. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
- 18.Martínez, R., Collins, A., Kay, J., Yacef, K.: Who did what? who said that?: Collaid: An environment for capturing traces of collaborative learning at the tabletop. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS 2011, pp. 172–181. ACM, NY, USA, New York (2011)Google Scholar
- 19.Murugappan, S., Elmqvist, N., Ramani, K., et al.: Extended multitouch: recovering touch posture and differentiating users using a depth camera. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 487–496. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
- 20.Qin, Y., Yu, C., Jiang, H., Wu, C., Shi, Y.: ppen: enabling authenticated pen and touch interaction on tabletop surfaces. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 283–284. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
- 21.Qin, Y., Yu, C., Jiang, H., Wu, C., Shi, Y.: ppen: Enabling authenticated pen and touch interaction on tabletop surfaces. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS 2010, pp. 283–284, NY, USA (2010). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1936652.1936717
- 22.Rädle, R., Jetter, H.C., Marquardt, N., Reiterer, H., Rogers, Y.: Huddlelamp: Spatially-aware mobile displays for ad-hoc around-the-table collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 45–54. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
- 23.Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., Mandryk, R.L.: System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In: Kuutti, K., Karsten, E.H., Fitzpatrick, G., Dourish, P., Schmidt, K. (eds.) ECSCW 2003, pp. 159–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wallace, J.R., Scott, S.D., MacGregor, C.G.: Collaborative sensemaking on a digital tabletop and personal tablets: prioritization, comparisons, and tableaux. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3345–3354. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
- 25.Wilson, A.D.: Using a depth camera as a touch sensor. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 69–72. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
- 26.Xambó, A., Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Jordà, S., Dobbyn, C., Laney, R.: Let’s jam the reactable: Peer learning during musical improvisation with a tabletop tangible interface. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 20(6), 36: 1–36: 34 (2013). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2530541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Xu, S., Manders, C.M.: Building a multi-touch tabletop for classrooms. In: Chang, M., Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, M.-P., Müller, W. (eds.) Edutainment 2011. LNCS, vol. 6872, pp. 131–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar