Advertisement

Investigating Communal Interactive Video Viewing Experiences Online

  • Lili LiuEmail author
  • Ayoung Suh
  • Christian Wagner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9733)

Abstract

A new generation of online video systems increasingly integrates online video content with social media communication interfaces, creating a communal (or quasi-communal) interactive viewing experience. This study seeks to enrich our understanding of why and how the communication features work to attract users to this new experience. Drawing on the affective response model, this study identifies antecedents of users’ affective and cognitive states and examines how these factors influence user satisfaction and intention to continue the experience. The model was tested using data collected from 212 users who had such communal interactive viewing experiences online. The results show that extraversion, display augmentability, and comment relevance are positively associated with playfulness, but negatively associated with cognition load. The results also reveal that playfulness positively influences satisfaction, whereas cognition load negatively influences satisfaction, which in turn positively influences intention to continue. Potential theoretical and practical implications of our findings are discussed.

Keywords

Communal interactive video viewing Affective response model Extraversion Display augmentability Comment relevance Playfulness Cognition load Satisfaction Intention to continue 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This paper was partly supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2054667) awarded to the second author.

References

  1. 1.
    Balaji, M., Chakrabarti, D.: Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘media richness theory’perspective. J. Interact. Online Learn. 9, 1–22 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis. Support Syst. 32, 201–214 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 25, 351–370 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Celik, H.: What determines Turkish customers’ acceptance of internet banking? Int. J. Bank Mark. 26, 353–370 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Y., Gao, Q., Rau, P.-L.P.: Understanding gratifications of watching danmaku videos – videos with overlaid comments. In: Rau, P.-L.P. (ed.) CCD 2015. LNCS, vol. 9180, pp. 153–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods. Bus. Res. 295, 295–336 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 14, 189–217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiu, C.M., Chiu, C.S., Chang, H.C.: Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention. Inf. Syst. J. 17, 271–287 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deng, L., Poole, M.S.: Affect in web interfaces: a study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. MIS Q. 34, 711–730 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 18, 382–388 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geerts, D., et al.: Are we in sync?: synchronization requirements for watching online video together. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goto, M.: Music listening in the future: augmented music-understanding interfaces and crowd music listening. In: Audio Engineering Society Conference: 42nd International Conference: Semantic Audio. Audio Engineering Society (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hair, J.F., et al.: Multivariate Data Analysis, vol. 6. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Homburg, C., Koschate, N., Hoyer, W.D.: The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: a dynamic perspective. J. Mark. 70, 21–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, D.: polyphonic/pseudo-synchronic: animated writing in the comment feed of nicovideo. Jpn. Stud. 33, 297–313 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang, Y.S., Lee, H.: understanding the role of an IT artifact in online service continuance: an extended perspective of user satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 353–364 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liang, H., et al.: Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q. 31, 59–87 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17, 460–469 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliver, R.L.: Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. J. Retail. 57, 25–48 (1981)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pham, M.T., et al.: Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. J. Consum. Res. 28, 167–188 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W.: Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manage. 12, 531–544 (1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A.: SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). Hamburg (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Segall, N., Doolen, T.L., Porter, J.D.: A usability comparison of PDA-based quizzes and paper-and-pencil quizzes. Comput. Educ. 45, 417–432 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shen, Y., Chan, H., Hung, I.: Let the Comments Fly: The Effects of Flying Commentary Presentation on Consumer Judgment (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tang, F., Wang, X., Norman, C.S.: An investigation of the impact of media capabilities and extraversion on social presence and user satisfaction. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32, 1060–1073 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van der Heijden, H.: User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 28, 695–704 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Dec. Sci. 39, 273–315 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16, 85–102 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, K.Z., et al.: Understanding the role of gender in bloggers’ switching behavior. Decis. Support Syst. 47, 540–546 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang, P.: The affective response model: a theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Q. 37, 247–274 (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhao, L., Lu, Y.: Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention. Decis. Support Syst. 53, 825–834 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zimmer, J.C., et al.: Investigating online information disclosure: Effects of information relevance, trust and risk. Inf. Manage. 47, 115–123 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Creative MediaCity University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations